Workforce identity and SSO for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 64 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53Microsoft Entra ID41Okta Workforce Identity02Microsoft Entra ID Governance05others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Entra ID held the lead, +4 points on 49%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
JumpCloud55%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 48% → 55%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Microsoft Entra ID46%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID53%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
JumpCloud55%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 48% → 55%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Entra ID46%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 46% → 46%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID53%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Entra ID53%14%74endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.49% → 53%
Microsoft Entra ID53%14%74endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 49% → 53%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.49% → 53%02
Okta Workforce Identity41%18%76endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 44% → 41%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.44% → 41%
Okta Workforce Identity41%18%76endorsed leader▼−3Since October 2026: 44% → 41%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.44% → 41%03
Ping Identity2%16%63accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Ping Identity2%16%63accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Auth00%43%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Auth00%43%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
OneLogin0%36%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
OneLogin0%36%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08JumpCloud0%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
JumpCloud0%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
IBM Verify0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
IBM Verify0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%04
CyberArk Identity0%8%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CyberArk Identity0%8%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
Microsoft Entra ID vs Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID vs JumpCloudMicrosoft Entra ID vs OneLogin
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID53%
Microsoft Entra ID53%02Okta Workforce Identity41%
Okta Workforce Identity41%03Ping Identity2%
Ping Identity2%04CyberArk Identity0%
CyberArk Identity0%05SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud0%06IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%07ForgeRock Identity Platform0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%08JumpCloud0%
JumpCloud0%09OneLogin0%
OneLogin0%10Auth00%
Auth00%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Entra ID14%
10 of 74 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Governance was added to an authentication product rather than designed in, and coverage for non-Microsoft apps and non-human identities asks more of your team” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Okta Workforce Identity18%
14 of 76 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Neither Microsoft nor Okta should be avoided—they are widely recognized market leaders. However, large enterprises must evaluate them with heightened strategic scrutiny” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Ping Identity16%
10 of 63 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Legacy/On-Prem Heavyweight Solutions (e.g., ForgeRock, Ping Identity) ... often criticized for complexity and a lack of internal expertise” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Auth043%
6 of 14 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if you're already concerned about Okta's ecosystem.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 914 links across 236 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 49 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 76 citations · 12 models
34 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Okta31 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Ping Identity29 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Microsoft22 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SSOJet19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MojoAuth18 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Clerk16 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)15 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 53%, Microsoft Entra ID Governance 2% | 55% | 499 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com | 41% | 202 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 2%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0% | 2% | 264 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| Microsoft Entra Suite | 2% | |||||||
| Okta Advanced Identity Cloud | 2% | |||||||
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity 0% | 0% | 54 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| SailPoint Identity Security Cloud sailpoint.com | 0% | 186 | 320 | 3 | 58,881 | 46 | ||
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 86 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| WorkOS workos.com | 0% | 30 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 | ||
| PingOne for Workforce | 0% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forrester.com, okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workforce identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Ping Identityno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, SSOJet, WorkOSThree alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: CyberArk IdentityMicrosoft Entra Suiteagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
One alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityFour alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity, PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud, PingOne for WorkforceOne alternative
PingOne for WorkforceGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityHeldMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Auth0, Broadcom, Curity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle Access Manager, Ping Identity, Rippling IT, Strivacity
Four alternatives
Auth0, CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, WorkOSOne alternative
Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
OneLogin, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity / ForgeRockPerplexity SonarOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Frontegg, FusionAuth, IBM Verify, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, WorkOS
Four alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, WorkOSTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityGrok 4.20Okta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloudMicrosoft Entra IDChangedagainst: Cisco Duo, JumpCloud, Keycloak, OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloud, OneLoginMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: BeyondCorp, JumpCloudagainst: Auth0, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityMistral SmallMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: SSOJet, WorkOSno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID
Four alternatives
Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity, WorkOSThree alternatives
Auth0, Cisco Duo, Ping IdentitySix alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityDeepSeek V4 FlashOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldagainst: JumpCloud, Keycloak, OneLogin, Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt Enterprise Identity CloudOkta Workforce Identityagainst: JumpCloudagainst: IBM Tivoli, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, legacy CA Identity
One alternative
Microsoft Entra IDOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity
One alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID Governance, Okta Advanced Identity Cloud, Ping Identityagainst: Archer, Auth0, Bokcrypt, ForgeRock Identity Platform, LastPass, Legacy Netegrity / IBM SecureWay, Maximo, PeopleSoft, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
OneLogin, Oracle Identity Governance, SailPoint Identity Security CloudKimi K2Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, SailPoint Identity Security CloudMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: CA/Broadcom Layer7 / SiteMinder, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Oracle IAM, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudOne alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Auth0Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Three alternatives
IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity, WorkOSSix alternatives
JumpCloud, Keycloak, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SSOJet, WorkOSThree alternatives
Authentik, JumpCloud Directory, KeycloakMiniMax M2.5Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identitynothing named
One alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Oracle Identity Management, Ping Identity, SailPoint Identity Security CloudThree alternatives
Entrust Identity as a Service, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityGPT-6 LunaOkta Workforce IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Microsoft Entra IDTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloudOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityFour alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, PingOne for Workforce, SailPoint Identity Security CloudMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Auth0, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID
Three alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Okta Workforce IdentityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:17 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:53 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:32 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:36 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:11 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 15 | 41 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:21 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 19 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 21 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 13 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:01 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 22 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 25 | 108 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 25 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 4 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:02 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 36 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:14 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:17 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 24 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 25 | 126 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 5 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (ID Platform) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (now part of Ping) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Google Workspace read as Google Cloud Identity
IBM read as IBM Verify
Microsoft (Entra ID/Azure AD) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Azure AD/Entra ID read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta (Workforce Identity Cloud) read as Okta Workforce Identity
Oracle read as Oracle Identity Governance
Ping read as Ping Identity
Ping Identity Platform – PingOne read as Ping Identity
Rippling read as Rippling IT
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Sailpoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Saviynt read as Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Bokcrypt
CA/Broadcom Layer7 / SiteMinder
Entrust Identity as a Service
JumpCloud Directory
Legacy Netegrity / IBM SecureWay
Maximo
Microsoft Entra Suite
Okta Advanced Identity Cloud
Oracle Access Management
Oracle IAM
PeopleSoft
legacy CA Identity
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.