Index › IT › Identity and access › CIAM › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Customer identity and access management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “customer identity platform”, and as “CIAM solution for a product's users”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Ping Identity 17%
38Auth017Ping Identity11FusionAuth34others

38% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−9Since October 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Auth0 held the lead, −9 points on 47%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Auth038%13%71endorsed leader▼−9Since October 2026: 47% → 38%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.47% → 38%
02Ping Identity17%9%65accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 6% → 17%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.6% → 17%
03Microsoft Entra External ID4%6%50accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 4%
04LoginRadius4%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
05Okta4%22%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06IBM Verify2%0%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
07WorkOS AuthKit2%8%24accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
08WSO2 Identity Server2%5%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Frontegg2%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
10Amazon Cognito2%29%24criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13ForgeRock Identity Platform0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Descope0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Transmit Security0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Auth038%
02Ping Identity17%
03Microsoft Entra External ID4%
04LoginRadius4%
05Okta4%
06IBM Verify2%
07WorkOS AuthKit2%
08WSO2 Identity Server2%
09Frontegg2%
10Amazon Cognito2%
11Descope0%
12Transmit Security0%
13ForgeRock Identity Platform0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Auth0
13%
9 of 71 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid selecting Auth0 solely on technical capability unless the vendor will provide a firm price cap” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Ping Identity
9%
6 of 65 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid: ForgeRock & PingIdentity ... you should avoid these vendors.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Amazon Cognito
29%
7 of 24 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid using basic cloud-provider auth scripts (AWS Cognito) for complex consumer apps” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Firebase Authentication
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms like Clerk and Firebase Auth should be avoided for identity governance bundled with CIAM use cases.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 887 links across 197 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

44 answers · 111 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ping Identity30 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta21 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · WorkOS17 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
13 answers · 20 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Clerk13 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer identity platform”, “customer identity platform”, “customer identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Auth0 auth0.com38%24518,100772170,673117
Ping pingidentity.com
Ping Identity 17%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0%
17%26412,10024973,959 company$30555
FusionAuth fusionauth.io11%491,3002144,19916
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Entra External ID 4%, Microsoft Entra ID 0%
4%4992,240,000403,136
LoginRadius loginradius.com4%37170739,70931
Okta okta.com4%151368,0008,4181,959,7401184
IBM parent site
IBM Verify 2%
2%86201,00034,098
WorkOS AuthKit workos.com2%7433,47875
WSO2 wso2.com
WSO2 Identity Server 2%
2%3114054,715 company13
Frontegg frontegg.com2%83720419,06010

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (okta.com, pingidentity.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best customer identity platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best customer identity platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CIAM solution for a product's users would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade customer identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer identity platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a customer identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer identity platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldOkta
Four alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
OneLogin
Two alternativesAuth0, SSOJet
against: CyberArk, Ping Identity, SailPoint
no first choiceagainst: Clerk, Firebase Authentication, WorkOS AuthKit
GPT-5.4 miniPing Identity
One alternativeAuth0
Ping IdentityHeld
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Okta/Auth0
Auth0
Three alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
against: OneLogin CIAM
FusionAuth
Two alternativesAuth0, WorkOS AuthKit
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashAuth0, WorkOS AuthKit
Three alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Auth0Changed
Three alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0
Four alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Transmit Security
against: Amazon Cognito
FusionAuth
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Auth0
no first choice
Six alternativesAuth0, Descope, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Amazon Cognito
against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Azure Active Directory B2C, Firebase Authentication, IBM Security Access Manager, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra ID for Employees, Okta Universal Directory, Oracle Access Manager
Perplexity SonarAuth0
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0Held
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, PingOne for Customers
Auth0
Seven alternativesFrontegg, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Transmit Security, WSO2 Identity Server, WorkOS AuthKit
FusionAuth
One alternativePing Identity
against: Auth0, Okta
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Keycloak, MojoAuth, Ping Identity / ForgeRock, WSO2 Identity Server, WorkOS AuthKit
Grok 4.20Ping Identity
Six alternativesAuth0, LoginRadius, Okta, Salesforce, Transmit Security, WSO2 Identity Server
OktaChanged
Four alternativesIBM Verify, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Okta
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Descope, Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C, Ping Identity
FusionAuth
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Okta Workforce
no first choiceagainst: Keycloak, Oryagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud, Microsoft Entra, Okta
Mistral SmallAuth0, Ping Identity
Three alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0Changed
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra ID, Ping Identity
Auth0
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud
Auth0
Two alternativesAmazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID
no first choiceagainst: Firebase Authentication, LiveRamp Identity Resolution, Okta, Tealium
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuth0
Three alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Auth0Held
Four alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Okta, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
Auth0
Four alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
Microsoft Entra External ID
Three alternativesAuth0, WSO2 Identity Platform, cidaas
against: Ping Identity
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud
Llama 4 Maverickno first choicePing Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerChangedno first choiceAuth0no first choiceagainst: Amperity, Clerk, Experian Identity Resolution, LiveRamp Identity Resolution, Twilio Segment Unify
Qwen 3.7 FlashFrontegg
Three alternativesAuth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
OktaChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Ping Identity
no first choiceLoginRadius
Two alternativesForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity
against: Auth0
no first choiceagainst: Auth0, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Oracle WebLogic / Informatica IAM, Salesforce
Kimi K2Auth0
Seven alternativesDescope, Frontegg, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Transmit Security, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0Held
Four alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0
Five alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Thales OneWelcome
Ping Identity
Two alternativesAmazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID
against: Auth0
no first choice
Six alternativesAuth0, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity, SSOJet, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
against: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Okta/Auth0, Ping Identity
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0
Five alternativesFrontegg, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
IBM VerifyChanged
One alternativePing Identity
Auth0
Four alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
Amazon Cognito
One alternativeAuth0
against: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5Auth0, LoginRadius
Two alternativesFrontegg, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0, Ping IdentityChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, WSO2 Identity Server
Auth0
Four alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
Curity Identity Server, Phase Two
Two alternativesMeiro CDP, WSO2 Identity Platform
against: Auth0, Okta
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Clerk, Firebase Authentication, OneLogin, Ping Identityagainst: Auth0, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Okta, Ping Identity
GPT-6 LunaAuth0
Three alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0Held
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Transmit Security Mosaic
against: Microsoft Entra External ID
PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud
Two alternativesAmazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID
Muse Glimmer 30BAuth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Four alternativesFrontegg, Kinde, LoginRadius, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0 [Okta Customer Identity Cloud]Changed
Four alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity [which now includes ForgeRock], WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0
Six alternativesIBM Verify, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, Okta, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server
FusionAuth
Three alternativesLoginRadius, PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud, WSO2 Identity Server
against: Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
no first choiceagainst: Acxiom Real Identity, LiveRamp Identity Resolution, Twilio Segment Unify
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:39no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:02yes37 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:32no017 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:16yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:47yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:17yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:03yes1948 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:24yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:48yes525 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:58yes1353 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:43yes2430 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:43yes1539 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:02yes515 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:04yes1325 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:03no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:46yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:18no022 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:29yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:40yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:17no06 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:31yes2031 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:26yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:34no036 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:34yes2037 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:24yes1338 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:23yes546 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:01yes414 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:09yes1523 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:14yes1510 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:18yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:12yes724 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:55yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:47yes513 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:15yes1412 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:35yes2540 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:55yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:35yes517 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:02yes2059 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 18:06yes2537 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:43yes2460 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:56yes722 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:51yes1528 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:53yes149 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:19yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:29yes1223 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:46yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:12yes2416 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:50yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:22yes2527 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:00yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:02yes527 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:15yes847 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:46yes24117 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:37yes1060 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:38yes312 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:00yes2533 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:42yes1814 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:43yes48 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:00no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:24yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:22yes513 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:17no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:25yes2335 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:19yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:10no035 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:44yes2478 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:45no021 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:38no029 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:11yes521 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:40yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:22yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:07no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:54yes630 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:58yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:10yes2519 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:37yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:13yes2455 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:07yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:57yes1052 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:46yes2542 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:39yes1959 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:03yes2581 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:08yes317 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:18yes2229 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (now part of Ping) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Ping read as Ping Identity
WSO2 read as WSO2 Identity Server
WorkOS read as WorkOS AuthKit
Unresolved, counted raw
ADFS
Acxiom Real Identity
Auth0 [Okta Customer Identity Cloud]
Azure Active Directory B2C
Curity Identity Server
Experian Identity Resolution
IBM Security Access Manager
Meiro CDP
Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C (now Entra External ID)
Microsoft Entra ID for Employees
Okta Universal Directory
OneLogin CIAM
Oracle WebLogic / Informatica IAM
Phase Two (Managed Keycloak)
Ping Identity [which now includes ForgeRock]
Salesforce Customer 360 / Identity
Salesforce Platform
Transmit Security Mosaic
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Certificate managementIGA →