Index › IT › Identity and access › CIAM › FusionAuth vs Clerk
Customer identity and access management · November 2026 Edition

FusionAuth vs Clerk

Zero of fourteen models named FusionAuth first on the direct prompt; zero named Clerk. FusionAuth was named by eight of the fourteen models and Clerk by ten and FusionAuth carries 14 labels and Clerk 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FusionAuth

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Clerk

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1423A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FusionAuth reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Frontegg was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Auth0 vs FusionAuth · Auth0 vs Clerk · WorkOS AuthKit vs FusionAuth

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer identity and access management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FusionAuthFirst choices, of fourteen modelsClerk
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained32
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Clerk
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, FusionAuth and Clerk were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 52 answers naming FusionAuth and the 84 naming Clerk. In those answers Clerk took the first choice seven times and FusionAuth two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FusionAuth and Clerk stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FusionAuth Clerk first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FusionAuth on the left and Clerk on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FusionAuth and Clerk stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Clerk, Descope, Frontegg, Stytch
Perplexity SonarAuth0 alternatives: Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, WorkOS AuthKit

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Auth0 alternatives: Frontegg, OneLogin, The OneWelcome Identity Platform
GPT-5.4 miniAuth0 alternatives: Frontegg, Ping Identity
Grok 4.20WorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Auth0, Frontegg, Stytch
Mistral SmallAuth0 alternatives: Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID
DeepSeek V4 FlashFrontegg alternatives: Descope, Kinde, WorkOS AuthKit
Llama 4 MaverickAuth0 alternatives: IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server, WorkOS AuthKit
Qwen 3.7 FlashFrontegg alternatives: Auth0, Descope, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch
Kimi K2WorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Frontegg, Stytch
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0 alternatives: Amazon Cognito, Descope, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SSOJet, Stytch, Transmit Security
MiniMax M2.5OneLogin alternatives: Frontegg, LoginRadius, SSOJet
GPT-6 LunaWorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Auth0, Stytch
Muse Glimmer 30BKinde, WorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Auth0, Frontegg, Okta, OneLogin

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Clerk leads by twenty points.
Clerk23%#1 of 15
FusionAuth3%#7 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: FusionAuth leads at mid-market.
FusionAuth6%#5 of 16
Clerk4%#6 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FusionAuth leads by eleven points.
FusionAuth11%#– of 13
Clerk0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FusionAuth

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For the most budget-conscious approach, FusionAuth and Keycloak stand out because they offer free self-hosted options with no per-user fees.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“For most companies with a limited budget, I'd recommend starting with FusionAuth's free Community Edition” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best balance of cost + features: FusionAuth” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Clerk

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Clerk's own postmortems show that outages in one service can cascade into session-management downtime, and Clerk notes its session service incidents can cause "complete downtime" for customers.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Clerk or similar developer-first tools as your only enterprise CIAM. Be cautious if you need mature consent management” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Modern developer-first options with good UX, but verify their long-term viability and security maturity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Clerk has become the go-to recommendation for modern startups building web apps” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value: Clerk” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Developer‑centric teams building modern consumer apps favor Auth0, Clerk, Supabase Auth, Firebase Auth, Descope, Frontegg” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.