Index › IT › Identity and access › CIAM · November 2026 Edition

Customer identity and access management

Asked as “customer identity platform”, and as “CIAM solution for a product's users”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
34%
Contested · WorkOS AuthKit 13%
34Auth013WorkOS AuthKit08Frontegg45others

34% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Auth0 (34%) replaces Frontegg (21% then, 8% now), 26 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Auth0 leads at 34%, replacing Frontegg, which led at 21% and stands at 8% now: 26 points clear, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Auth034%22%69endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 18% → 34%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 34%
02WorkOS AuthKit13%10%29accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 7% → 13%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 13%
03Frontegg8%0%32accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 21% → 8%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.21% → 8%
04Kinde8%0%10accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%
05FusionAuth6%0%14accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
06Clerk4%13%23accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 18% → 4%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 4%
07Keycloak4%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
08Firebase Authentication Lab in the set4%25%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
09Microsoft Entra External ID2%15%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
10Amazon Cognito2%19%36accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Okta2%56%18criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16ForgeRock Identity Platform0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Ping Identity0%17%36accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Descope0%6%36accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
14Stytch0%5%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15LoginRadius0%0%13accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.12% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Firebase Authentication is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Auth034%
02WorkOS AuthKit13%
03Frontegg8%
04Kinde8%
05FusionAuth6%
06Clerk4%
07Keycloak4%
08Firebase Authentication4%
09Microsoft Entra External ID2%
10Amazon Cognito2%
11Okta2%
12Descope0%
13Ping Identity0%
14Stytch0%
15LoginRadius0%
16ForgeRock Identity Platform0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Auth0
22%
15 of 69 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Post‑acquisition pricing increases (2–3× at renewal) reported by long‑term customers... Developer sentiment shows sharp declines in support quality” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Okta
56%
10 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Multiple attacks (Lapsus$, 0ktapus) and support‑unit breaches since 2022... High‑value target; compromise of a leading IdaaS can cascade to many downstream services.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Ping Identity
17%
6 of 36 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid overkill enterprise tools like Okta's full suite or Ping Identity, which start higher.” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Amazon Cognito
19%
7 of 36 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Amazon Cognito for security-sensitive or complex CIAM... comparisons flag limited adaptive MFA, self-service enterprise SSO, fraud controls, and passwordless capabilities” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 847 links across 202 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 14 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

34 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta20 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ping Identity17 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 19 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer identity platform”, “customer identity platform”, “customer identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Auth0 auth0.com34%24518,100772170,673117
WorkOS AuthKit workos.com
WorkOS AuthKit 13%, WorkOS User Management 2%
15%7433,47875
Frontegg frontegg.com8%83720419,06010
Kinde kinde.com8%403,6002,404,33920,21848
FusionAuth fusionauth.io6%491,3002144,19916
Clerk clerk.com4%62110,00059,08246,22512
Keycloak keycloak.org4%4912,1005898,582
Supabase Auth supabase.com4%191,9006291,4244
Firebase firebase.google.com
Firebase Authentication 4%
4%3590,5003,43791,247 company
miniOrange miniorange.com4%391,3001848,29017

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (okta.com, pingidentity.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best customer identity platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best customer identity platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CIAM solution for a product's users would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top customer identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer identity platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a customer identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer identity platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Auth0
Three alternativesFrontegg, OneLogin, The OneWelcome Identity Platform
Auth0Held
Two alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID
no first choiceFusionAuth, Keycloak
Two alternativesDescope, Frontegg
no first choiceagainst: Auth0, HashiCorp Vault, PingFederate
GPT-5.4 miniAuth0
Two alternativesFrontegg, Ping Identity
against: Microsoft Entra
Auth0, Microsoft Entra External IDChanged
One alternativeAmazon Cognito
against: Microsoft Entra External ID
Auth0
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
FusionAuth, Keycloak
Three alternativesClerk, Supabase Auth, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Auth0
no first choiceagainst: Clerk, Okta, WorkOS AuthKit
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkOS AuthKit
Four alternativesClerk, Descope, Frontegg, Stytch
against: Auth0
WorkOS AuthKitHeld
Four alternativesAuth0, Clerk, Descope, Stytch
Auth0
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Clerk, Firebase Authentication, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Firebase Authentication, Supabase Auth
Seven alternativesAmazon Cognito, Clerk, Descope, Keycloak, Logto, SuperTokens, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Auth0, Okta
no first choice
Four alternativesClerk, Descope, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Basic Supabase Auth, Firebase Authentication, Keycloak, Legacy On-Premises Oracle Identity, Okta, Older Ping Identity / ForgeRock On-Prem Deployments, Ory
Perplexity SonarAuth0
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, WorkOS AuthKit
FronteggChanged
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Descope, FusionAuth
Auth0
Nine alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Stytch, Transmit Security, WorkOS AuthKit
Amazon Cognito
Three alternativesDescope, FusionAuth, Kinde
against: Auth0
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Clerk, Firebase Authentication, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity
Grok 4.20WorkOS AuthKit
Three alternativesAuth0, Frontegg, Stytch
against: Descope, Okta, Ping Identity
Auth0Changed
Five alternativesFrontegg, LoginRadius, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server, cidaas
Auth0
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, Google Cloud Identity, Ping Identity, Transmit Security
against: Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID
SuperTokens
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, Kinde, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Okta, Ping Identity
Auth0
Four alternativesLoginRadius, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, Stytch
against: Amazon Cognito, Bazaarvoice, Black Crow, Descope, ForgeRock Identity Platform, LiveRamp, Microsoft Entra External ID, Okta, Opensend, Retention.com
Mistral SmallAuth0
Two alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID
Auth0Held
Three alternatives1Kosmos, Frontegg, Ping Identity
Auth0
Seven alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
Kinde, miniOrange
Two alternativesDescope, LoginRadius
no first choiceagainst: Auth0against: CyberArk Identity, LiveRamp Identity Resolution, Passage, SecureAuth
DeepSeek V4 FlashFrontegg
Three alternativesDescope, Kinde, WorkOS AuthKit
against: Auth0, Okta, Ping Identity
Auth0Changed
Four alternativesClerk, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID
Auth0
Six alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Stytch
FusionAuth
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, Keycloak, SSOJet
against: Auth0
Auth0
Four alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Transmit Security
against: Amazon Cognito
against: Cisco Duo, Clerk, Okta, Omada, OneIdentity, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
Llama 4 MaverickAuth0
Five alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity Server, WorkOS AuthKit
no first choiceChangedno first choiceKinde
Nine alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Descope, Firebase Authentication, Frontegg, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch, WorkOS AuthKit
no first choiceagainst: Salesforce Data Cloud, Simon Data, Tealium, Twilio Segment, mParticle
Qwen 3.7 FlashFrontegg
Four alternativesAuth0, Descope, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch
against: Ping Identity
Auth0Changed
Three alternativesAuthentik, Clerk, Kinde
Auth0
Four alternativesAmazon Cognito, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity
Clerk
Four alternativesAuth0, Firebase Authentication, Keycloak, Supabase Auth
no first choiceagainst: Keycloak, WorkOS AuthKit
Kimi K2WorkOS AuthKit
Two alternativesFrontegg, Stytch
FronteggChanged
One alternativeClerk
against: Auth0
Auth0
Six alternativesDescope, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Stytch
Clerk
Three alternativesKinde, SuperTokens, WorkOS AuthKit
no first choiceagainst: Auth0, Okta, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0
Eight alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SSOJet, Stytch, Transmit Security
against: Auth0
Auth0Held
Two alternativesMicrosoft Entra External ID, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0
Fourteen alternativesAmazon Cognito, Clerk, Descope, Entrust, Firebase Authentication, Frontegg, Google Cloud Identity, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Salesforce Platform, Supabase Auth, Transmit Security, WSO2 Identity Server
Auth0
Five alternativesAmazon Cognito, Descope, FusionAuth, Keycloak, miniOrange
Okta
Six alternativesAuth0, Descope, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra External ID, OneLogin, Ping Identity
against: Auth0, IDMerit, IDScan.net, Okta, Persona, Sumsub
MiniMax M2.5OneLogin
Three alternativesFrontegg, LoginRadius, SSOJet
Auth0Changed
Four alternativesDescope, Frontegg, Ping Identity, Rippling
Auth0
Five alternativesIBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Stytch, WSO2 Identity Server
Kinde, miniOrange
Two alternativesClerk, Okta
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaWorkOS AuthKit
Two alternativesAuth0, Stytch
WorkOS AuthKitHeld
Three alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID
Auth0
Six alternativesAmazon Cognito, Clerk, Descope, Microsoft Entra External ID, PingOne Advanced Identity Cloud, PingOne for Customers
Supabase Auth
Three alternativesAmazon Cognito, Auth0, Clerk
no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID
Muse Glimmer 30BKinde, WorkOS AuthKit
Four alternativesAuth0, Frontegg, Okta, OneLogin
Auth0Changed
Four alternativesFrontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOS AuthKit
Auth0
Four alternativesDescope, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Firebase Authentication, Google Identity Platform, WorkOS User Management
Six alternativesAmazon Cognito, Boku Identity, Descope, FusionAuth, Keycloak, miniOrange
no first choiceagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud formerly Janrain, ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping Identity
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:36yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:38yes55 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:44yes1123 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:54yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:25yes1513 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:35yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:13yes2427 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:54yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:29yes521 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:22yes1522 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:47yes2071 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:00yes520 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:53yes416 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:40yes1323 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:49yes1610 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:32yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:06no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:01yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:20yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:36yes56 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:18yes2445 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:18yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:58yes924 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:05yes1932 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:53yes2164 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:24yes941 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:52yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:31yes1522 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:42yes188 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:48yes87 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:17no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:45yes107 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:33yes917 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:01yes1012 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:20yes2431 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:46yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:03yes526 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:16yes2532 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:28yes1592 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:51yes2551 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:58yes725 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:08yes2444 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:42yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:12no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:21yes520 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:13yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:33yes512 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:54yes56 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:26yes2320 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:26yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:03no030 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:03yes943 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:25yes2351 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:45yes514 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:07yes412 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:48yes1018 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:16no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:53no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:48no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:00yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:01yes1018 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:08no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:40yes1732 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:11yes56 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:22no033 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:20yes1530 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:31yes1026 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:11yes1045 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:51yes316 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:07yes1324 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:11yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:47yes66 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:41no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:27yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:33yes1420 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 19:38yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:39yes2441 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:34yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:19yes535 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:38yes2524 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:21yes2557 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:14no038 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:55yes317 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:59yes2434 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Firebase read as Firebase Authentication
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (Ping Identity) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
ForgeRock (Ping) read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Ping read as Ping Identity
Supabase read as Supabase Auth
WSO2 read as WSO2 Identity Server
WorkOS read as WorkOS AuthKit
Unresolved, counted raw
Akamai Identity Cloud formerly Janrain
AuthX
Basic Supabase Auth
Bazaarvoice
Black Crow
Legacy On-Premises Oracle Identity
Older Ping Identity / ForgeRock On-Prem Deployments
Opensend
Retention.com
SAP Customer Service Identity
Salesforce Platform
The OneWelcome Identity Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Certificate managementIGA →