Index › IT › Identity and access › NHI management › Oasis Security vs GitGuardian NHI Governance
Non-human identity management · November 2026 Edition

Oasis Security vs GitGuardian NHI Governance

Two of fourteen models named Oasis Security first on the direct prompt; zero named GitGuardian NHI Governance. Oasis Security was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and GitGuardian NHI Governance by eight and Oasis Security carries 32 labels and GitGuardian NHI Governance 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Oasis Security

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

GitGuardian NHI Governance

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels3221A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Oasis Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.JumpCloud was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. JumpCloud vs Oasis Security · JumpCloud vs GitGuardian NHI Governance · Akeyless Identity Security Platform vs Oasis Security

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the non-human identity management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Oasis SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGitGuardian NHI Governance
Direct20
Paraphrase00
Comparative20
Budget-constrained023 against Oasis Security
Scale-constrained10
Negative004 against Oasis Security · 1 against GitGuardian NHI Governance
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Oasis Security and GitGuardian NHI Governance were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 82 answers naming Oasis Security and the 60 naming GitGuardian NHI Governance. In those answers GitGuardian NHI Governance took the first choice two times and Oasis Security one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Oasis Security and GitGuardian NHI Governance stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Oasis Security GitGuardian NHI Governance first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Oasis Security on the left and GitGuardian NHI Governance on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Oasis Security and GitGuardian NHI Governance stood in it.

Oasis Security first, GitGuardian NHI Governance not the choice

2 of 14 modelsGitGuardian NHI Governance was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Rig, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Veza
Gemini 3.5 FlashOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5JumpCloud alternatives: Entro Security, Natoma, Oasis Security
Grok 4.20Aembit alternatives: Astrix Security, Entro Security, Oasis Security
Muse Glimmer 30BJumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Astrix Security, Defakto, Entro Security, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
Mistral SmallCakewalk, JumpCloud alternatives: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Defakto
DeepSeek V4 FlashJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Clutch Security, Natoma
Llama 4 MaverickCakewalk alternatives: Identity Confluence, JumpCloud, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Cakewalk alternatives: Astrix Security, JumpCloud
Kimi K2Aembit alternatives: Clutch Security, Entro Security, SSOJet, WorkOS
GLM 4.7 FlashXAembit alternatives: Defakto, One Identity, Saviynt Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5JumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Defakto, Entro Security, Identity Confluence
GPT-6 LunaToken Security alternatives: Aembit

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GitGuardian NHI Governance leads by six points.
GitGuardian NHI Governance6%#6 of 17
Oasis Security0%#16 of 17
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Oasis Security leads at mid-market.
Oasis Security6%#4 of 18
GitGuardian NHI Governance4%#6 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Oasis Security leads by twelve points.
Oasis Security12%#2 of 19
GitGuardian NHI Governance0%#15 of 19
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Oasis Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid starting with Astrix, Oasis, Entro, or similar dedicated NHI platforms on a tight budget” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid commercial platforms like Astrix, Oasis, Entro, CyberArk/Venafi, or Keyfactor” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Oasis Security was acquired by Cyera in 2026 for ~$1B. Post-acquisition integration can lead to roadmap shifts, reduced support, or feature deprecation” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“look especially at Aembit, Oasis Security, and Astrix — they've been noted as particularly well-suited for mid-market/cloud-first teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“1. Oasis Security ... Select Oasis, Astrix, or Entro if your main problem is identity sprawl and blind spots” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market-leading end-to-end NHI lifecycle platform; strong focus on AI agents and agentic access” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about GitGuardian NHI Governance

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“shows cons like false positives, inefficient notifications, and alert overload” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need a free or very low-cost solution, start with GitGuardian.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: GitGuardian (Starter Tier — Free)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Entro or GitGuardian when discovery begins with secrets sprawl in code, CI/CD, cloud, or collaboration systems.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.