Non-human identity management · November 2026 Edition
Oasis Security vs HashiCorp Vault
Two of fourteen models named Oasis Security first on the direct prompt; zero named HashiCorp Vault. Oasis Security was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and HashiCorp Vault by fourteen and Oasis Security carries 32 labels and HashiCorp Vault 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%39%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels3241A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Oasis Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.JumpCloud was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. JumpCloud vs Oasis Security · JumpCloud vs HashiCorp Vault · Akeyless Identity Security Platform vs Oasis Security
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the non-human identity management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Oasis SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHashiCorp Vault
Direct202 against HashiCorp Vault
Paraphrase023 against HashiCorp Vault
Comparative201 against HashiCorp Vault
Budget-constrained013 against Oasis Security · 1 against HashiCorp Vault
Scale-constrained10
Negative004 against Oasis Security · 9 against HashiCorp Vault
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Oasis Security and HashiCorp Vault stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Oasis Security HashiCorp Vault first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Oasis Security on the left and HashiCorp Vault on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Oasis Security and HashiCorp Vault stood in it.
Oasis Security first, HashiCorp Vault not the choice
2 of 14 modelsHashiCorp Vault was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Rig, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Veza
Gemini 3.5 FlashOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5JumpCloud alternatives: Entro Security, Natoma, Oasis Security
Grok 4.20Aembit alternatives: Astrix Security, Entro Security, Oasis Security
Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Astrix Security, Defakto, Entro Security, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
Mistral SmallCakewalk, JumpCloud alternatives: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Defakto
DeepSeek V4 FlashJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Clutch Security, Natoma
Llama 4 MaverickCakewalk alternatives: Identity Confluence, JumpCloud, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Cakewalk alternatives: Astrix Security, JumpCloud
Kimi K2Aembit alternatives: Clutch Security, Entro Security, SSOJet, WorkOS
GLM 4.7 FlashXAembit alternatives: Defakto, One Identity, Saviynt Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5JumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Defakto, Entro Security, Identity Confluence
GPT-6 LunaToken Security alternatives: Aembit
Muse Glimmer 30BJumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HashiCorp Vault leads by two points.
HashiCorp Vault2%#11 of 17Oasis Security0%#16 of 17Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Oasis Security6%#4 of 18HashiCorp Vault6%#5 of 18Enterprise
The order flips: Oasis Security leads at enterprise.
Oasis Security12%#2 of 19HashiCorp Vault2%#12 of 19What the models said about Oasis Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid starting with Astrix, Oasis, Entro, or similar dedicated NHI platforms on a tight budget” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid commercial platforms like Astrix, Oasis, Entro, CyberArk/Venafi, or Keyfactor” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Oasis Security was acquired by Cyera in 2026 for ~$1B. Post-acquisition integration can lead to roadmap shifts, reduced support, or feature deprecation” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“look especially at Aembit, Oasis Security, and Astrix — they've been noted as particularly well-suited for mid-market/cloud-first teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“1. Oasis Security ... Select Oasis, Astrix, or Entro if your main problem is identity sprawl and blind spots” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market-leading end-to-end NHI lifecycle platform; strong focus on AI agents and agentic access” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about HashiCorp Vault
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“you may want to be cautious about or avoid using HashiCorp Vault, SailPoint, Okta, and AWS Secrets Manager” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
Also compared
JumpCloud vs Oasis SecurityJumpCloud vs HashiCorp VaultAkeyless Identity Security Platform vs Oasis SecurityAkeyless Identity Security Platform vs HashiCorp VaultAembit vs Oasis SecurityAembit vs HashiCorp VaultOasis Security vs GitGuardian NHI GovernanceOasis Security vs SailPoint Machine Identity SecurityOasis Security vs Token SecurityHashiCorp Vault vs GitGuardian NHI GovernanceHashiCorp Vault vs SailPoint Machine Identity SecurityHashiCorp Vault vs Token SecurityAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full NHI management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.