Non-human identity management · RankedEntro Security
Entro Security is a non-human identity management product from Entro · entro.security ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
JumpCloud is first at 20%.
JumpCloud is first at 22%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
CyberArk Identity Security Platform is first at 20%.
Why models recommend it
“Astrix or Entro: choose these when the primary problem is discovering, monitoring, and remediating machine-to-machine credentials”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
“Choose Entro or GitGuardian when discovery begins with secrets sprawl in code, CI/CD, cloud, or collaboration systems.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Entro instead if your main gap is visibility and risk management across cloud, SaaS, code repositories”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Best for: Organizations that want NHI governance tightly tied into a broader identity governance (IGA) platform”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid starting with Astrix, Oasis, Entro, or similar dedicated NHI platforms on a tight budget”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid commercial platforms like Astrix, Oasis, Entro, CyberArk/Venafi, or Keyfactor”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Newer or Less Proven Startups (e.g., Oasis Security, Token Security, Clutch Security, Entro Security, Astrix Security)”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Entro's AWS Marketplace listing shows a $50,000 starter pack, which is usually not "limited budget" territory”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Entro Security, over the 82 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 3 | View → | |
| 55 | 7 | View → | |
| 55 | 5 | View → | |
| 48 | 8 | View → | |
| 45 | 1 | View → | |
| 40 | 9 | View → | |
| 36 | 2 | View → | |
| 31 | 0 | View → | |
| 26 | 3 | View → | |
| 26 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Entro Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Entro Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- IAM and AppSec teams
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 80 of the 82 answers that named Entro Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
269 of the 290 domain citations in answers naming Entro Security came from a third party's page. Twenty-one were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,004 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | Secrets, PAM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 390 | 0 | 2026-02-27 | Secrets, IGA | |
| Podcast or video | 28 | 0 | 2026-03-11 | ||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | NHI management, SAST | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2025-03-23 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2025-06-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 0 | 2023-05-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-06-26Entro webguard stop sensitive data from leaking into ai tools blog
- 2026-05-19Your ai agents are taking actions you never approved heres how to stop it blog
- 2026-04-14What makes agentic ai a smart choice for data security blog
- 2026-04-14How agentic ai helps you stay ahead in market competition blog
- 2026-04-13How capable is agentic ai in handling complex cloud deployments blog
- 2026-04-13How is agentic ai driving innovation in cybersecurity blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page entro.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name secrets (124); 8 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.