CyberArk Identity Security Platform is an identity security product from CyberArk, categorized under identity governance and secrets management · cyberark.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
JumpCloud is first at 20%.
JumpCloud is first at 22%.
Ranked first, contested: Oasis Security has 12%.
“Choose CyberArk when privileged access, vaulting, credential rotation, certificates, or PAM are central requirements.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“Broadest portfolio covering privileged access, secrets management, certificate management, and AI agent identities”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“The top non-human identity management platforms are Microsoft, Saviynt, and CyberArk.”Llama 4 Maverick · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose CyberArk or Delinea when privileged accounts, administrator sessions, and just-in-time access are the primary risk.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Avoid commercial platforms like Astrix, Oasis, Entro, CyberArk/Venafi, or Keyfactor”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Cautious if your needs are detection/response-heavy rather than access management; they may overlap with existing IAM tools and add complexity.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“if you use it only as a secrets vault and don't leverage its identity governance capabilities, you'll miss the bigger picture”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Unlike traditional secrets vaults (such as self-hosted HashiCorp Vault or CyberArk) that require dedicated engineering teams”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as CyberArk Identity Security Platform, over the 135 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 7 | View → | |
| 61 | 1 | View → | |
| 50 | 4 | View → | |
| 47 | 7 | View → | |
| 46 | 1 | View → | |
| 45 | 0 | View → | |
| 43 | 7 | View → | |
| 41 | 5 | View → | |
| 40 | 0 | View → | |
| 36 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of CyberArk Identity Security Platform →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on CyberArk Identity Security Platform's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 118 of the 135 answers that named CyberArk Identity Security Platform and are not a share of its labels.
335 of the 362 domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Identity Security Platform came from a third party's page. Twenty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |