CyberArk Conjur is a secrets management product from CyberArk that sits close to privileged access management · cyberark.com ↗
“Prioritize Open-Source with Strong Community & Security Audits: (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Conjur, ESO Enterprise Secrets Manager)”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · alternative
“Ideal for regulated industries or companies needing PAM-grade governance and identity management.”Mistral Small · Direct question · alternative
“If governance and CI/CD integration are top priorities, evaluate Conjur.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Highly regulated organization already using CyberArk: CyberArk Conjur.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“Generally advised to avoid unless you are a regulated enterprise”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“exposed 14 zero-day vulnerabilities in major secrets management platforms including HashiCorp Vault and CyberArk Conjur”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“Complex and costly to operate. Steeper learning curve; best suited for large organizations.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · warning
“Can be overkill and expensive for a 500-person company if you don't need full PAM.”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as CyberArk Conjur, over the 78 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 42 | View → | |
| 61 | 0 | View → | |
| 55 | 0 | View → | |
| 44 | 6 | View → | |
| 42 | 3 | View → | |
| 41 | 0 | View → | |
| 31 | 3 | View → | |
| 21 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → | |
| 11 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of CyberArk Conjur →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on CyberArk Conjur's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 72 of the 78 answers that named CyberArk Conjur and are not a share of its labels.
215 of the 233 domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Conjur came from a third party's page. Eighteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |