Index › IT › Identity and access › NHI management › Akeyless Identity Security Platform vs Token Security
Non-human identity management · November 2026 Edition

Akeyless Identity Security Platform vs Token Security

One of fourteen models named Akeyless Identity Security Platform first on the direct prompt; one named Token Security. Akeyless Identity Security Platform was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Token Security by ten and Akeyless Identity Security Platform carries 47 labels and Token Security 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Token Security

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels4717A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Akeyless Identity Security Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.JumpCloud was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. JumpCloud vs Akeyless Identity Security Platform · JumpCloud vs Token Security · Akeyless Identity Security Platform vs Aembit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the non-human identity management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Akeyless Identity Security PlatformFirst choices, of fourteen modelsToken Security
Direct11
Paraphrase40
Comparative00
Budget-constrained102 against Akeyless Identity Security Platform
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Akeyless Identity Security Platform · 2 against Token Security
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Akeyless Identity Security Platform and Token Security stood in it.
ModelDirectAIParaphraseAIComparativeAIBudget-constrainedAIScale-constrainedAINegativeAI
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 miniAIAIAI
Gemini 3.5 FlashAIAI
Perplexity SonarAIAI
Grok 4.20AIAI
Mistral SmallAIAIAI
DeepSeek V4 FlashAIAIAIAI
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashAIAIAIAIAI
Kimi K2AIAIAI
GLM 4.7 FlashXAIAIAI
MiniMax M2.5AI
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
AI Akeyless Identity Security Platform Token SecurityAI first choiceAI named as an alternativeAI argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Akeyless Identity Security Platform on the left and Token Security on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Akeyless Identity Security Platform and Token Security stood in it.

Akeyless Identity Security Platform first, Token Security not the choice

1 of 14 modelsToken Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashAkeyless Identity Security Platform, Cakewalk alternatives: Astrix Security, JumpCloud

Token Security first, Akeyless Identity Security Platform not the choice

1 of 14 modelsAkeyless Identity Security Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaToken Security alternatives: Aembit

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Entro Security
Mistral SmallCakewalk, JumpCloud alternatives: Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Defakto
DeepSeek V4 FlashJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Akeyless Identity Security Platform, Clutch Security, Natoma

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5JumpCloud alternatives: Entro Security, Natoma, Oasis Security
GPT-5.4 miniOasis Security alternatives: Aembit, Rig, SailPoint Machine Identity Security, Veza
Perplexity SonarJumpCloud alternatives: Aembit, Astrix Security, Defakto, Entro Security, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta
Grok 4.20Aembit alternatives: Astrix Security, Entro Security, Oasis Security
Llama 4 MaverickCakewalk alternatives: Identity Confluence, JumpCloud, Saviynt Identity Cloud
Kimi K2Aembit alternatives: Clutch Security, Entro Security, SSOJet, WorkOS
GLM 4.7 FlashXAembit alternatives: Defakto, One Identity, Saviynt Identity Cloud
MiniMax M2.5JumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Defakto, Entro Security, Identity Confluence
Muse Glimmer 30BJumpCloud alternatives: Cakewalk, Entro Security, GitGuardian NHI Governance

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Akeyless Identity Security Platform leads by sixteen points.
Akeyless Identity Security Platform16%#2 of 17
Token Security0%#– of 17
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Akeyless Identity Security Platform leads by ten points.
Akeyless Identity Security Platform12%#2 of 18
Token Security2%#8 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Akeyless Identity Security Platform leads by six points.
Akeyless Identity Security Platform8%#4 of 19
Token Security2%#11 of 19
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Akeyless Identity Security Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“also strong but may be better suited for engineering-led teams or those with more complex needs, as they tend to have enterprise-focused pricing models” Mistral Small · budget prompt · soft negative
“strong secret-management capabilities do not automatically equal comprehensive NHI governance” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“these are enterprise-priced (often $10k–$100k+ per year)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest starting with JumpCloud or Akeyless as they offer free tiers and scalable pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Cakewalk and Akeyless are currently the leading recommendations for this specific segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend Akeyless as the top choice for machine identity and service account security.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Token Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Newer or Less Proven Startups (e.g., Oasis Security, Token Security, Clutch Security, Entro Security, Astrix Security)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong at visibility, but its lifecycle and governance features were less mature compared to leaders.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Token Security is my first shortlist pick for broad NHI governance” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“strong on discovery, visibility, ownership, dependency tracking, and risk analysis for non-human identities” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“A newer entrant focused on AI and bot identity.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.