Staffing agency platforms
Asked as “staffing agency platform”, and as “recruitment agency ATS and CRM”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Bullhorn 24%
25Zoho Recruit24Bullhorn16Recruit CRM35others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Zoho Recruit held the lead, +3 points on 22%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Zoho Recruit35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Recruit25%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Bullhorn47%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Zoho Recruit35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Recruit25%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseBullhorn47%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Zoho Recruit25%3%31accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 25%
Zoho Recruit25%3%31accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 25%02Bullhorn24%13%45accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 24%
Bullhorn24%13%45accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 22% → 24%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 24%03
Recruit CRM16%0%23accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 8% → 16%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 16%
Recruit CRM16%0%23accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 8% → 16%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 16%04
Vincere6%0%10accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
Vincere6%0%10accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%05
JobAdder4%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
JobAdder4%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06
Crelate2%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Crelate2%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Recruiterflow2%0%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Recruiterflow2%0%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%08
Loxo2%0%10accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Loxo2%0%10accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%09
Manatal2%8%12accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%
Manatal2%8%12accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 10% → 2%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Robert Half0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Robert Half0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Ceipal0%15%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Ceipal0%15%13accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
JobDiva0%13%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
JobDiva0%13%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10Avionté0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12
TempWorks0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
TempWorks0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Tracker RMS0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tracker RMS0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Zoho Recruit vs JobAdderZoho Recruit vs CrelateZoho Recruit vs RecruiterflowZoho Recruit vs LoxoBullhorn vs Recruit CRMBullhorn vs VincereBullhorn vs JobAdderBullhorn vs CrelateBullhorn vs RecruiterflowBullhorn vs LoxoRecruit CRM vs VincereRecruit CRM vs JobAdderRecruit CRM vs CrelateRecruit CRM vs RecruiterflowRecruit CRM vs LoxoVincere vs JobAdderVincere vs CrelateVincere vs RecruiterflowVincere vs LoxoJobAdder vs CrelateJobAdder vs RecruiterflowJobAdder vs LoxoCrelate vs RecruiterflowCrelate vs LoxoRecruiterflow vs Loxo
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809A10
1112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Zoho Recruit25%
Zoho Recruit25%02Bullhorn24%
Bullhorn24%03Recruit CRM16%
Recruit CRM16%04Vincere6%
Vincere6%05JobAdder4%
JobAdder4%06Crelate2%
Crelate2%07Recruiterflow2%
Recruiterflow2%08Loxo2%
Loxo2%09Manatal2%
Manatal2%10Avionté0%
11JobDiva0%
JobDiva0%12TempWorks0%
TempWorks0%13Tracker RMS0%
Tracker RMS0%14Ceipal0%
Ceipal0%15Robert Half0%
Robert Half0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Robert Half64%
7 of 11 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Both have numerous complaints about their practices, with Robert Half being particularly notorious.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Teksystems100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“many individuals should steer clear of Teksystems and Robert Half, with Teksystems reportedly having a worse reputation” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Bullhorn13%
6 of 45 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Bullhorn (from $99–315/user/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Kansys Staffing Group
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“platforms that individuals should be cautious about or avoid” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 740 links across 247 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
28 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR23 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Bullhorn19 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group13 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
vendor site · JazzHR12 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Reddit10 answers · 39 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G210 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best staffing agency platform”, “staffing agency platform”, “staffing agency platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 25% | 25% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Bullhorn bullhorn.com | 24% | 180 | 49,500 | 1,451 | 53,403 | $226 | 17 | 4 |
| Recruit CRM recruitcrm.io | 16% | 109 | 2,400 | 149 | 6,950 | 18 | ||
| Vincere vincere.io | 6% | 22 | 1,300 | 271 | ||||
| JobAdder jobadder.com | 4% | 20 | 720 | 37 | 1,820 | 1 | ||
| Crelate crelate.com | 2% | 65 | 2,400 | 41 | 6,935 | $2,457 | 12 | |
| Recruiterflow recruiterflow.com | 2% | 75 | 1,000 | 18 | 30,455 | 19 | ||
| Loxo loxo.co | 2% | 100 | 5,400 | 107 | 5,248 | 23 | ||
| Manatal manatal.com | 2% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | ||
| 100Hires 100hires.com | 2% | 123 | 90 | 2 | 705 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bullhorn.com, reddit.com). The first result for “best staffing agency platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best staffing agency platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruitment agency ATS and CRM would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top staffing agency platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best staffing agency platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a staffing agency platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which staffing agency platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5JobAdder, Recruit CRMGreenhouse, LeverChangedagainst: Salesforceno first choiceagainst: Bullhornno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Alois Staffing, Ark Solutions, Inc., Bluestone Staffing, Enterprise Solution, Inc., Gi Group, Han Staffing, Integra People, KRG Tech, Softpath, StaffingMatch.com, US Tech Solutions, Inc.
Two alternatives
Bullhorn, RecruiterflowTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, HubSpotFour alternatives
Avionté, Crelate, Vincere, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
BambooHR, Fiverr, Lever, Upwork, WorkableGPT-5.4 miniBullhornRecruit CRMChangedBullhorn100Hires, Zoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, JobDiva, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Bullhorn, Recruiterflow, Top EchelonSix alternatives
Aviont, Crelate, JobAdder, Recruiterflow, Sense, VincereOne alternative
Recruit CRMGemini 3.5 FlashConexis VMSagainst: Beeline, SAP FieldglassLoxoChangedBullhornZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Credico, Cydcor, Jobcase, Lensa, Smart Circle
Seven alternatives
Bullhorn, Fiverr, Recruit CRM, Recruiterflow, RecruitiFi, Scout Exchange, WorksuiteSix alternatives
Ashby, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, Recruit CRM, RecruiterflowSix alternatives
Avionté, Instawork, JobDiva, Loxo, ShiftKey, UpworkFour alternatives
Giig Hire, Instawork, Manatal, UpworkPerplexity SonarBullhornagainst: Zoho RecruitRecruit CRMChangedBullhornZoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Recruiterflow, VincereTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, CrelateNine alternatives
Aviont, Ceipal, Crelate, JobDiva, Loxo, Recruit CRM, Recruiterflow, TempWorks, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
ManatalGrok 4.20BullhornRecruit CRMChangedagainst: Greenhouse, Manatal, WorkableIndeed Flex, Wonoloagainst: DoorDash, TaskRabbit, UberZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Adecco, Beacon Hill Staffing, Craigslist, Express Employment Professionals, HireMinds, Hollister Staffing, Indeed, Insight Global, Kelly Services, Labor Ready, LinkedIn, Manpower, Professional Staffing Group, Randstad, Robert Half, Teksystems, The Select Group, ZipRecruiter
Four alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, Recruiterflow, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, RecruiterflowThree alternatives
Bluecrew, GigSmart, InstaworkFour alternatives
Ceipal ATS, Crelate, Manatal, Recruit CRMMistral SmallBullhorn, Zoho RecruitAshbyChangedagainst: Salesforceno first choiceZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: ALKU, Cielo Talent, Goodwin Consulting/Goodwin Recruiting, Jobgether, Jobot, Kansys Staffing Group, Lensa, Real Staffing, Robert Half, Talentify, Talently, Teksystems
Three alternatives
Greenhouse, HubSpot, LeverTwo alternatives
Ceipal, Tracker RMSDeepSeek V4 FlashBullhornCrelateChangedAvionté, BullhornZoho Recruitagainst: Aviont, Bullhorn, JobDivano first choiceagainst: Adecco, Hiregy, Randstad, Robert Half, Teksystems, WorkIndia
Four alternatives
Crelate, JobDiva, Recruit CRM, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, Recruit CRMFour alternatives
Ceipal ATS, Crelate, JobDiva, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
100Hires, ManatalLlama 4 MaverickVincereBullhorn, Recruit CRMChangedno first choiceZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Jobot, Kansys Staffing Group, Lensa, RemoteHunter, Robert Half, Teksystems
Three alternatives
100Hires, Bullhorn, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Recruit CRM, Tracker RMSQwen 3.7 FlashVincereJobAdderChangedagainst: BullhornBullhornZoho Recruitagainst: Bullhornno first choiceagainst: Aerotek, Indeed, Kelly Services, LinkedIn, PeopleReady
Two alternatives
Bullhorn, CrelateOne alternative
Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobDiva, RecruiterflowTwo alternatives
RecruitingCRM, Tracker RMSKimi K2BullhornRecruit CRM, VincereChangedBullhornZoho Recruitagainst: Bullhorn, Ceipal, OpenCATSno first choiceagainst: Aerotek, Fiverr, Insight Global, Labor Ready, Nigel Frank, PeoplePerHour, Robert Half, Staffmark, Teksystems, Upwork
Four alternatives
100Hires, Avionté, JobDiva, Recruit CRMTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, LoxoSeven alternatives
Aviont, Ceipal ATS, Crelate, JobDiva, Recruit CRM, TempWorks, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
ManatalGLM 4.7 FlashXBullhornBullhorn, Recruit CRMChangedAvionté, BullhornRecruitingCRMno first choiceagainst: BBSI Staffing, Kansys Staffing Group, Kelly Services, Professional Staffing Group, Robert Half, SOS Staffing, Staffmark, Teksystems
Four alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobAdder, LonglistTwo alternatives
JobAdder, LoxoFour alternatives
Ceipal ATS, JobDiva, Liveforce, LonglistFour alternatives
Craigslist, Handshake, Indeed, Zoho RecruitMiniMax M2.5Bullhorn, Zoho RecruitRecruiterflow, WorkableChangedBullhornZoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
One alternative
VincereThree alternatives
Bullhorn, Recruit CRM, VincereFour alternatives
Crelate, Recruit CRM, TempWorks, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
JazzHR, Reqcore, Tracker RMSGPT-6 LunaBeelineAccess Vincere EvoChangedno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: Instawork
Two alternatives
SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLYTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, GreenhouseSeven alternatives
Avionté, Bullhorn, Ceipal, Crelate, JobDiva, Loxo, TempWorksOne alternative
Zoho RecruitMuse Glimmer 30BBullhornBullhorn, Recruit CRMChangedagainst: HubSpot, SalesforceBullhornZoho Recruitagainst: Avionte, Bullhorn, Ceipal, JobDivano first choiceagainst: Glassdoor, Harnham, Hiregy, Indeed, Kansys Staffing Group, Labor Ready, OnTrack Staffing, Randstad, Robert Half, Teksystems, ZipRecruiter
Eight alternatives
100Hires, Avionté, Ceipal, Crelate, JobAdder, JobDiva, Loxo, TempWorksOne alternative
RecruiterflowTen alternatives
Avionte for Staffing Firms, Ceipal ATS, Crelate, JobAdder, JobDiva, Loxo, Manatal, TempWorks, Tracker RMS, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Jobsoid, Manatal, RecruitingCRMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 15 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 53 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 14 | 70 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:18 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 9 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 7 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 20 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:17 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 25 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:38 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CEIPAL read as Ceipal
Ceipal read as Ceipal
Tracker read as Tracker RMS
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
01 (Bullhorn One)
ALKU
Access Vincere Evo
Alois Staffing
Aqore
Ark Solutions, Inc.
Aviont
Avionte for Staffing Firms
BBSI Staffing
Bluestone Staffing
Bond MRP
Bond Street
Bullhorn Staffing
Cielo Talent
Credico
Cydcor
Dunhill Staffing Systems
EasyHire AI
Enterprise Solution, Inc.
Firefish Software
Gi Group
GiigHire
Goodwin Consulting/Goodwin Recruiting
Haley Marketing Group
Han Staffing
Harnham
HireMinds
Hollister Staffing
Integra People
Jobcase
KRG Tech
Near
OnTrack Staffing
Recruiter.com Marketplace
RecruitiFi
SOS Staffing
Scout Exchange (by Workday)
Smart Circle
Softpath
StaffDNA
StaffingMatch.com
Symphony
The Judge Group
The Select Group
US Tech Solutions, Inc.
Virtustant
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.