Staffing agency platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “staffing agency platform”, and as “recruitment agency ATS and CRM”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Bullhorn10iCIMS Talent Cloud06Greenhouse37others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Bullhorn held the lead, +5 points on 42%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Zoho Recruit35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Recruit25%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Bullhorn47%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Zoho Recruit35%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 36% → 35%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketZoho Recruit25%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 22% → 25%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseBullhorn47%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Bullhorn47%14%51endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.42% → 47%
Bullhorn47%14%51endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 42% → 47%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.42% → 47%02
iCIMS Talent Cloud10%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%
iCIMS Talent Cloud10%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%03
SAP Fieldglass6%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
SAP Fieldglass6%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%04
Greenhouse6%8%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Greenhouse6%8%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%05Avionté4%4%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
06
Beeline2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Beeline2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Workday Recruiting0%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09Zoho Recruit0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Zoho Recruit0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Ceipal0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Ceipal0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
JobDiva0%4%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
JobDiva0%4%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Zoho Recruit vs JobAdderZoho Recruit vs CrelateZoho Recruit vs RecruiterflowZoho Recruit vs LoxoBullhorn vs Recruit CRMBullhorn vs VincereBullhorn vs JobAdderBullhorn vs CrelateBullhorn vs RecruiterflowBullhorn vs LoxoRecruit CRM vs VincereRecruit CRM vs JobAdderRecruit CRM vs CrelateRecruit CRM vs RecruiterflowRecruit CRM vs LoxoVincere vs JobAdderVincere vs CrelateVincere vs RecruiterflowVincere vs LoxoJobAdder vs CrelateJobAdder vs RecruiterflowJobAdder vs LoxoCrelate vs RecruiterflowCrelate vs LoxoRecruiterflow vs Loxo
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304A05
0607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Bullhorn47%
Bullhorn47%02iCIMS Talent Cloud10%
iCIMS Talent Cloud10%03SAP Fieldglass6%
SAP Fieldglass6%04Greenhouse6%
Greenhouse6%05Avionté4%
06Beeline2%
Beeline2%07JobDiva0%
JobDiva0%08Ceipal0%
Ceipal0%09Zoho Recruit0%
Zoho Recruit0%10Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bullhorn14%
7 of 51 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“platforms like Bullhorn are frequently cited as problematic for large enterprises requiring deep customization” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Robert Half100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Many recommend avoiding them due to widespread negative experiences and a reputation for unethical practices” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Fiverr100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Examples: Standard Upwork (non-Enterprise), Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Guru ... Why Enterprises Should Avoid Them” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Teksystems100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“complaints about contract changes, poor support, limited benefits, and high-pressure tactics” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 960 links across 346 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Bullhorn27 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 46 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 11 models
vendor site · JazzHR14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Pin12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FirstHR11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · RecruitBPM11 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
23 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best staffing agency platform”, “staffing agency platform”, “staffing agency platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bullhorn bullhorn.com Bullhorn 47%, Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud 4% | 51% | 180 | 49,500 | 1,451 | 53,403 | $226 | 17 | 4 |
| iCIMS icims.com iCIMS Talent Cloud 10% | 10% | 40 | 27,100 | 667 | 1,165,712 company | $5,674 | 26 | |
| SAP parent site SAP Fieldglass 6%, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 0% | 6% | 141 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 6% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 | |
| Avionté | 4% | 52 | ||||||
| Worksome worksome.com | 4% | 58 | 880 | 7 | 1,226 | 24 | ||
| Beeline beeline.com | 2% | 13 | 27,100 | 1,443 | 19,910 | $53 | 5 | |
| Avature avature.net | 2% | 106 | 2,900 | 60 | 541,149 | 44 | ||
| SmartRecruiters smartrecruiters.com | 2% | 168 | 9,900 | 194 | 272,094 | 0 | ||
| 100Hires 100hires.com | 2% | 123 | 90 | 2 | 705 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bullhorn.com). The first result for “best staffing agency platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best staffing agency platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruitment agency ATS and CRM would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade staffing agency platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best staffing agency platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Negative“Which staffing agency platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BullhornBullhorn, GreenhouseChangedBullhornBullhornnothing named
Two alternatives
Ceipal, JobDivaThree alternatives
MokaHR, Workday, iCIMS Talent CloudThree alternatives
Avionte, Crelate, VincereOne alternative
DeelGPT-5.4 miniBullhornBullhorn Recruitment CloudChangedBullhornagainst: UKG ProWorksomenothing named
Three alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, JobDivaThree alternatives
Ceipal, Greenhouse, LeverTwo alternatives
Avionté, CeipalTwo alternatives
Bullhorn, CeipalGemini 3.5 FlashWorkday VNDLYBullhornChangedBullhornSAP Fieldglassagainst: Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Guru, Upwork
Six alternatives
Aviont, Beeline, Bullhorn, SAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS, TargetRecruitSeven alternatives
Avature, Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Phenom, SmartRecruiters, TargetRecruit, Workday RecruitingFive alternatives
Avionté, JobDiva, TargetRecruit, TempWorks Software, VincereSix alternatives
Beeline, Deel, Instawork, Rippling, WorkMarket, WorksuitePerplexity SonarBullhornagainst: CeipalBullhorn ATS + CRMChangedagainst: Greenhouse, Recruit CRM, SmartRecruitersBullhornagainst: TeambridgeHapplicantagainst: Bullhornagainst: Aviont\u00e9, Bullhorn, Ceipal, Crelate, JobDiva, Manatal, Recruit CRM, TempWorks, Vincere, Zoho Recruit
Two alternatives
Aviontè, Zoho Recruit or Recruit CRMTwo alternatives
TargetRecruit, VincereSix alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, Crelate, JobDiva, Recruiterflow, VincereGrok 4.20BullhornBullhornHeldagainst: SpottBullhornSAP Fieldglassagainst: SimplifyVMS, Zoho Recruitagainst: ASK Consulting, Adecco, Bullhorn, Fiverr, Hiregy, ManpowerGroup, Randstad, Robert Half, TRC Staffing/TalentLaunch, Teksystems, Upwork, Wipro
Three alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, JobDivaFour alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, Vincere, iCIMS Talent CloudFour alternatives
Avature, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudThree alternatives
Beeline, Magnit, TAPFINMistral SmallBullhornGreenhouse, iCIMS Talent CloudChangedBullhornBullhornagainst: Adecco, Apex Systems, FDM Group, Greyhound, Insight Global, LHH, Labor Ready, Motive, Nigel Frank, Robert Half, Smoothstack, Teksystems
Three alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobDivaFour alternatives
Gem, Recruit CRM, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingFive alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, Crelate, JobDiva, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Avionté, CeipalDeepSeek V4 FlashBullhorniCIMS Talent CloudChangedagainst: Workday RecruitingBullhornagainst: VincereAviontéagainst: Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Upwork
Two alternatives
Ceipal ATS, JobDivaThree alternatives
Avature, Bullhorn, GreenhouseThree alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobDivaThree alternatives
Bullhorn, JobDiva, Zoho RecruitLlama 4 MaverickBullhornBullhornHeldBullhornBullhornnothing named
Three alternatives
Manatal, Zoho Recruit, iCIMS Talent CloudTwo alternatives
Recruit CRM, RecruiterflowThree alternatives
Avionté, Recruit CRM, Zoho RecruitQwen 3.7 FlashBullhornSmartRecruiters, iCIMS Talent CloudChangedBullhorn Staffing SoftwareAvionté, Bullhornagainst: Aviont, Bullhorn, StaffConnect
Two alternatives
Avionté, JobDivaFive alternatives
Beamery, Greenhouse, Phenom, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingFour alternatives
JobDiva, SmartRecruiters, Talisma, iCIMS Talent CloudKimi K2BullhornBullhorn, Greenhouse, iCIMS Talent CloudChangedagainst: Oracle Taleo, Workday RecruitingBullhornBullhorn Recruitment Cloud, SAP Fieldglassagainst: Better Placement, Insight Global, Inspire Hotel Staffing, Randstad, Robert Half, Select Staffing, Smoothstack, Staffing Solutions of WNY, Supreme Staffing, Teksystems
Four alternatives
Avionté, Beeline, JobDiva, SAP FieldglassTwo alternatives
Ashby, LeverThree alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobDivaThree alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AI, PhenomGLM 4.7 FlashXBullhornAvatureChangedBullhornagainst: Deel HR, Workday RecruitingWorksomeagainst: Avature Contingent Workforce Management, RecruitBPM, Recruiter.comagainst: Avionté, Bullhorn
Five alternatives
Ceipal ATS, Deel, Gem, JobDiva, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Bullhorn, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS Talent CloudSix alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, JobDiva, PCRecruiter, TempWorks, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Beeline VMS, Bullhorn, HireArt, SAP Fieldglass, StaftrMiniMax M2.5BullhorniCIMS Talent CloudChangedBullhornRecruitOnlineagainst: Bullhornagainst: Kansys Staffing Group, Robert Half, Teksystems
Two alternatives
Ceipal, JobDivaFour alternatives
Beamery, Greenhouse, Lever, Workday RecruitingFour alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal, JobDiva, TempWorksOne alternative
100HiresGPT-6 LunaBeelineBullhornChangedAvionté, Bullhorn, TempWorksagainst: TargetRecruitGreenfield Softwareagainst: Job.com / My Job Matcher
Three alternatives
Bullhorn, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLYOne alternative
AvatureTwo alternatives
Ceipal, JobDivaOne alternative
BeelineMuse Glimmer 30BBullhornBullhornHeldBullhorn, JobDiva100Hiresagainst: Bullhornagainst: Avionte, Ceipal, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, JobAdder, TempWorks, Upwork
Three alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, JobDivaOne alternative
Access Vincere Evo / Access Recruitment CRM EvoThree alternatives
Avionté, Ceipal ATS, Workday RecruitingTwo alternatives
Deel, WorksomeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 13 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 20 | 76 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 25 | 145 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 14 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:40 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 20 | 58 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 18 | 44 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 21 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 23 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:46 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:11 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:15 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 13 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:59 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:38 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 10 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 15 | 93 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 2 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CEIPAL read as Ceipal
Ceipal read as Ceipal
Tracker read as Tracker RMS
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
ASK Consulting
Access Vincere Evo / Access Recruitment CRM Evo
Aviont
Aviontè
Better Placement
Bullhorn ATS + CRM
Bullhorn Staffing Software
FDM Group
Greenfield Software
Greenfield Solutions
Greyhound
HireArt
Inspire Hotel Staffing
Job.com / My Job Matcher
KORE1
RecruitOnline
Select Staffing
StaffConnect
Staffing Solutions of WNY
Supreme Staffing
TRC Staffing/TalentLaunch
Talisma
Wipro
Zoho Recruit or Recruit CRM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.