Bullhorn is an AI recruitment platform for staffing and recruitment agencies of all sizes · bullhorn.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Zoho Recruit is first at 35%.
Zoho Recruit is first at 25%. 9 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is iCIMS Talent Cloud at 10%.
“If you need market-proven scale, deep staffing-specific compliance and a large partner ecosystem, start with Bullhorn. It is the default mid-size / large agency platform.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B staffing agencies, Bullhorn remains the safest choice due to its market dominance, extensive integrations, and proven scalability.”Kimi K2 · Direct question · first choice
“the most established, enterprise-leaning staffing platform; strong end-to-end ATS/CRM, automation, and a large ecosystem/marketplace”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B staffing agencies, Bullhorn offers the best balance of features, scalability, and proven track record.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“Platforms to Be Cautious About or Potentially Avoid: Bullhorn ... Extremely slow performance ... Some call it a "major regret" for agencies.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Using Bullhorn is incredibly frustrating; the user interface can drive you to the brink of wanting to break your screen.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“often cited by recruiters themselves as inefficient for candidate management”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“What I'd Avoid for Your Use Case - Recruit CRM / Bullhorn / Tracker RMS”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Bullhorn, over the 189 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 64 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 0 | View → | |
| 47 | 9 | View → | |
| 45 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 6 | View → | |
| 39 | 1 | View → | |
| 33 | 0 | View → | |
| 32 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 1 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Bullhorn →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Bullhorn's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 180 of the 189 answers that named Bullhorn and are not a share of its labels.
415 of the 484 domain citations in answers naming Bullhorn came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 3,544 | 12 | 2026-09-18 | Applicant tracking syste, Workforce management sui | |
| News or press | 796 | 0 | 2018-03-13 | Applicant tracking syste, AI recruiting assistants | |
| Conference or event | 335 | 0 | 2023-07-05 | Pay equity | |
| Case study | 262 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 178 | 0 | 2023-09-21 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Glossary or explainer | 154 | 0 | 2026-05-02 | Applicant tracking syste | |
| Report or ebook | 15 | 0 | 2022-01-24 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2018-09-18 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2021-08-30 |
As the event pages on bullhorn.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page bullhorn.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.