Bullhorn vs Recruit CRM
Nine of fourteen models named Bullhorn first on the direct prompt; one named Recruit CRM. Bullhorn was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Recruit CRM by twelve and Bullhorn carries 45 labels and Recruit CRM 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the staffing agency platforms page.
By framing
BullhornFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRecruit CRM
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Bullhorn and Recruit CRM were named in the same answer sixty-four times, of the 189 answers naming Bullhorn and the 110 naming Recruit CRM. In those answers Recruit CRM took the first choice twenty times and Bullhorn thirteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Bullhorn Recruit CRM first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Bullhorn on the left and Recruit CRM on the right.The direct prompt
Bullhorn first, Recruit CRM an alternative
9 of 14 modelsRecruit CRM was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Recruit CRM first, Bullhorn an alternative
1 of 14 modelsBullhorn was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Recruit CRM24%#2 of 11Bullhorn9%#4 of 11Bullhorn24%#2 of 15Recruit CRM16%#3 of 15Bullhorn47%#1 of 10Recruit CRM0%#– of 10What the models said about Bullhorn
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you need market-proven scale, deep staffing-specific compliance and a large partner ecosystem, start with Bullhorn. It is the default mid-size / large agency platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B staffing agencies, Bullhorn remains the safest choice due to its market dominance, extensive integrations, and proven scalability.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“the most established, enterprise-leaning staffing platform; strong end-to-end ATS/CRM, automation, and a large ecosystem/marketplace” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Recruit CRM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Recruit CRM is the strongest mid-market alternative and is repeatedly recommended specifically for mid-size agencies.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For boutique or mid-size agencies, Recruit CRM is recommended as the CRM solution.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.