Recruitment marketing and career sites for enterprise buyers
Asked as “recruitment marketing platform”, and as “career site builder”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45Phenom08Avature08Radancy38others
45% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Phenom held the lead, +10 points on 35%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Teamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Phenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTeamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterprisePhenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Phenom45%11%61endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.35% → 45%
Phenom45%11%61endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.35% → 45%02
Avature8%8%38accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 8%
Avature8%8%38accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 5% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 8%03
Radancy8%12%40accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%
Radancy8%12%40accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 3% → 8%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 8%04
iCIMS Attract7%18%44accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 7%
iCIMS Attract7%18%44accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 7%05
SmartRecruiters5%9%32accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 5%
SmartRecruiters5%9%32accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 3% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 5%06
Greenhouse5%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
Greenhouse5%11%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%07
Beamery3%9%43accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 12% → 3%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 3%
Beamery3%9%43accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 12% → 3%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 3%08
Bullhorn3%14%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
Bullhorn3%14%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%09Teamtailor3%50%12criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%
Teamtailor3%50%12criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 3%10
Joveo2%14%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Joveo2%14%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%11
Handshake2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Handshake2%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Appcast0%41%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Appcast0%41%22criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14
Workday Recruiting0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Symphony Talent0%17%29accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Symphony Talent0%17%29accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%13
Eightfold AI0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Eightfold AI0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Teamtailor vs WorkableTeamtailor vs GemTeamtailor vs TalentLyftTeamtailor vs BeameryManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs GreenhouseManatal vs WorkableManatal vs GemManatal vs TalentLyftManatal vs BeameryZoho Recruit vs GreenhouseZoho Recruit vs WorkableZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs TalentLyftZoho Recruit vs BeameryGreenhouse vs WorkableGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs TalentLyftGreenhouse vs BeameryWorkable vs GemWorkable vs TalentLyftWorkable vs BeameryGem vs TalentLyftGem vs BeameryTalentLyft vs Beamery
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Phenom45%
Phenom45%02Avature8%
Avature8%03Radancy8%
Radancy8%04iCIMS Attract7%
iCIMS Attract7%05SmartRecruiters5%
SmartRecruiters5%06Greenhouse5%
Greenhouse5%07Beamery3%
Beamery3%08Bullhorn3%
Bullhorn3%09Teamtailor3%
Teamtailor3%10Joveo2%
Joveo2%11Handshake2%
Handshake2%12Symphony Talent0%
Symphony Talent0%13Eightfold AI0%
Eightfold AI0%14Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%15Appcast0%
Appcast0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Appcast41%
9 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Users report receiving applicants lacking relevant experience and qualifications... High costs per applicant and a steep learning curve make it difficult to achieve ROI” Mistral Small, negative prompt
iCIMS Attract18%
8 of 44 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to avoid: iCIMS, Beamery, and Phenom. These platforms use custom quotes that can vary wildly.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Teamtailor50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“SMB-first tools like Manatal, Workable, Teamtailor, 100Hires, Recruiterflow, Freshteam, Breezy HR” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Phenom11%
7 of 61 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“AI features described by users as "Actual.Imbecile" – doesn't work as advertised” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 948 links across 251 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G239 answers · 75 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G230 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework27 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Joveo18 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Phenom17 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Jobful16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
27 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenom phenom.com | 45% | 331 | 18,100 | 2,229 | 24,487 | 0 | ||
| Avature avature.net | 8% | 106 | 2,900 | 60 | 541,149 | 44 | ||
| Radancy radancy.com | 8% | 85 | 1,900 | 36 | 7,692 | 5 | ||
| iCIMS icims.com iCIMS Attract 7% | 7% | 64 | 27,100 | 667 | 1,165,712 company | $5,674 | 26 | |
| SmartRecruiters smartrecruiters.com | 5% | 168 | 9,900 | 194 | 272,094 | 0 | ||
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 5% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 | |
| Beamery beamery.com | 3% | 262 | 1,000 | 21 | 12,866 | 0 | ||
| Bullhorn bullhorn.com | 3% | 180 | 49,500 | 1,451 | 53,403 | $226 | 17 | |
| Teamtailor teamtailor.com | 3% | 109 | 2,400 | 59 | 42,407 | $230 | 114 | |
| Joveo joveo.com | 2% | 155 | 720 | 32 | 14,781 | 15 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (joveo.com, learn.g2.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com, softwareadvice.com). The first result for “best recruitment marketing platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which career site builder would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade recruitment marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a recruitment marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which recruitment marketing platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PhenomPhenomHeldPhenomJoveoagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, iCIMS Attractno first choiceagainst: Symphony Talent, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
Avature, Greenhouse, iCIMS AttractThree alternatives
Greenhouse, MokaHR, iCIMS AttractFour alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Joveo, Symphony TalentTwo alternatives
SmartRecruiters, WorkableGPT-5.4 miniGreenhousePhenomChangedPhenomBullhorn, Greenhouseno first choiceagainst: Recruitee, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
Appcast, Bullhorn, PhenomThree alternatives
Beamery, Bullhorn, GreenhouseFour alternatives
Beamery, Built In, Eightfold AI, Hire IntelligenceOne alternative
JoveoGemini 3.5 FlashPhenomPhenomHeldagainst: Squarespace, WordPressPhenomPhenomno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Breezy HR, Broadbean, JazzHR, Joveo, Oracle HCM Recruiting Cloud Native Career Sites, Recruitee, SAP SuccessFactors Native Career Portals, Symphony Talent, Taleo Social, Teamtailor, Workable, Workday Native CRM / Candidate Experience, eQuest
Four alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AI, Radancy, iCIMS AttractSix alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AI, Paradox, Radancy, SAP SuccessFactors CSB, Workday Career Site BuilderFive alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Radancy, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractThree alternatives
Beamery, Eightfold AI, RadancyPerplexity SonarPhenomPhenomHeldPhenomSmartRecruitersno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Avature, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gem, Joveo, PandoLogic, Phenom, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, Veritone Hire, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
Avature, Beamery, RadancyFour alternatives
Avature, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony TalentEight alternatives
Appcast, Avature, Beamery, Joveo, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractFour alternatives
Phenom, Radancy, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractGrok 4.20PhenomPhenomHeldagainst: Breezy HR, Lever, Oracle Recruiting, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, TeamtailorPhenomRadancyagainst: Avature, Recruitics, Symphony TalentAvature, Beamery, Phenomagainst: TalentLyftagainst: Avature, Ceipal, Glassdoor, Indeed, LinkedIn Recruiter, Paycor, Radancy, SeekOut, Zoho Recruit, hireEZ
Four alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Radancy, SmartRecruitersThree alternatives
Radancy, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS AttractNine alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Handshake, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractThree alternatives
Beamery, Phenom, SmartRecruitersTwo alternatives
LinkedIn Talent Solutions, iCIMS AttractMistral SmallPhenomPhenom, SmartRecruiters, TeamtailorChangedno first choicePhenom, Radancyno first choiceagainst: Appcast, ClearCompany, Jobvite, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Ngage, Recruitee
Four alternatives
Avature, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, HandshakeTwo alternatives
CareerPage, Symphony TalentTwo alternatives
Beamery, JoveoDeepSeek V4 FlashPhenomPhenomHeldPhenomJobvite, Phenomagainst: Radancyno first choiceagainst: Jobvite, Oracle Taleo Cloud, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
Avature, Beamery, RadancyThree alternatives
Avature, Radancy, iCIMS AttractTen alternatives
Appcast, Avature, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Joveo, Radancy, Sense, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, SmartRecruitersLlama 4 MaverickBullhorn, Greenhouse, Handshake, RadancyPhenom, Radancy, iCIMS AttractChangedno first choicePhenomno first choiceagainst: Phenom, Teamtailor
Three alternatives
Jobful, SmartRecruiters, TeamtailorTwo alternatives
Joveo, iCIMS AttractQwen 3.7 FlashiCIMS Attractagainst: SmartRecruitersAvature, iCIMS AttractChangedBeamery, PhenomPhenomPeopleno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Phenom, Radancy, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Symphony Talent, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, Workday RecruitingFour alternatives
Ongig, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday RecruitingFour alternatives
Avature, Eightfold AI, Joveo, SmartRecruitersThree alternatives
Avature, Beamery, iCIMS AttractKimi K2Avature, PhenomPhenom, RadancyChangedagainst: Homerun, TeamtailorPhenom, iCIMS Attractagainst: SmartRecruitersSmartRecruitersagainst: Phenom, Radancyno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Beamery, Bullhorn, Phenom, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Attract
Four alternatives
Beamery, Bullhorn, Eightfold AI, GreenhouseThree alternatives
Avature, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS AttractSix alternatives
Avature, Beamery, PageUp Clinch, Paradox, Radancy, Symphony TalentThree alternatives
Beamery, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractGLM 4.7 FlashXBeamery, PhenomiCIMS AttractChangedPhenomRecruitlyagainst: Beamery, Phenom, iCIMS Attractno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Bullhorn, Jobylon, Loxo, Recruit CRM, Workday Recruiting, Zoho Recruit
Four alternatives
Appcast, Avature, Joveo, SmartRecruitersSix alternatives
Avature, MokaHR, Ongig, Paradox, Phenom, RadancyThirteen alternatives
Appcast, Avature, Beamery, Greenhouse, Joveo, PandoLogic, SAP SuccessFactors HCM, SmartDreamers, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, Teamtailor, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
Ashby, ManatalMiniMax M2.5PhenomAvatureChangedPhenomTeamtailoragainst: Greenhouseno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Greenhouse, Jobvite, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Teamtailor
Six alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Joveo, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
Oracle Taleo Enterprise Edition, iCIMS AttractFive alternatives
Beamery, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
Otter, RecruitlyGPT-6 LunaPhenomPhenomHeldno first choiceAshbyno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Phenom, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, iCIMS Attract
Three alternatives
Avature, Beamery, RadancyOne alternative
RadancyEight alternatives
Avature, Beamery, PageUp Clinch, Phenom, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, iCIMS AttractOne alternative
PhenomMuse Glimmer 30BPhenomAvature Career Sites, PhenomChangedPhenomagainst: Appcast, Joveo, PandoLogic, RecruiticsAvatureno first choiceagainst: 100Hires, Appcast, Breezy HR, Freshteam, Manatal, Recruiterflow, Teamtailor, Workable
Five alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Radancy, Symphony TalentThree alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Career Site Builder, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS AttractEight alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Jobvite, PageUp Clinch, Radancy, SmartRecruiters, Symphony TalentTwo alternatives
Jobful, PhenomBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:43 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 85 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 12 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 48 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 20 | 161 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 24 | 65 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 19 | 64 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 24 | 91 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 9 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 25 | 99 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 8 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 25 | 141 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 17 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 3 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
ICIMS read as iCIMS Attract
Oracle read as Oracle Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Workday (in recruitment context) read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Attract
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS Attract
Unresolved, counted raw
Avature Career Sites
Hire Intelligence
HireClix
Jibe
Ngage
Oracle HCM Recruiting Cloud Native Career Sites
Oracle Taleo Cloud
Oracle Taleo Enterprise Edition
SAP SuccessFactors CSB
SAP SuccessFactors Career Site Builder
SAP SuccessFactors Native Career Portals
Taleo Social
Workday Career Site Builder (CSB)
Workday Native CRM / Candidate Experience
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.