Technical hiring assessments for enterprise buyers
Asked as “coding assessment platform”, and as “technical interview tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Codility 21%
38HackerRank21Codility15Coderbyte26others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−13Since October 2026: 51% → 38%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.HackerRank held the lead, −13 points on 51%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Coderbyte36%Contested▲+14Since October 2026: 22% → 36%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-market
HackerRank23%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 17% → 23%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseHackerRank38%Contested▼−13Since October 2026: 51% → 38%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Coderbyte36%Contested▲+14Since October 2026: 22% → 36%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketHackerRank23%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 17% → 23%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseHackerRank38%Contested▼−13Since October 2026: 51% → 38%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01HackerRank38%18%68endorsed leader▼−13Since October 2026: 51% → 38%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.51% → 38%
HackerRank38%18%68endorsed leader▼−13Since October 2026: 51% → 38%, −13 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.51% → 38%02
Codility21%15%61accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 11% → 21%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 21%
Codility21%15%61accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 11% → 21%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 21%03Coderbyte15%9%35accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.18% → 15%
Coderbyte15%9%35accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.18% → 15%04
CodeSignal11%21%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 13% → 11%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 11%
CodeSignal11%21%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 13% → 11%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 11%05
CoderPad4%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
CoderPad4%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06HackerEarth Assessments2%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
TestGorilla0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
TestGorilla0%38%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Mercer | Mettl0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Mercer | Mettl0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
iMocha0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
iMocha0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Karat0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Karat0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
HackerRank vs CoderPadHackerRank vs TestDomeHackerRank vs TestGorillaCodility vs CoderbyteCodility vs CodeSignalCodility vs CoderPadCodility vs TestDomeCodility vs TestGorillaCoderbyte vs CodeSignalCoderbyte vs CoderPadCoderbyte vs TestDomeCoderbyte vs TestGorillaCodeSignal vs CoderPadCodeSignal vs TestDomeCodeSignal vs TestGorillaCoderPad vs TestDomeCoderPad vs TestGorillaTestDome vs TestGorilla
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405H06
07080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01HackerRank38%
HackerRank38%02Codility21%
Codility21%03Coderbyte15%
Coderbyte15%04CodeSignal11%
CodeSignal11%05CoderPad4%
CoderPad4%06HackerEarth Assessments2%
07Karat0%
Karat0%08Mercer | Mettl0%
Mercer | Mettl0%09iMocha0%
iMocha0%10TestGorilla0%
TestGorilla0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HackerRank18%
12 of 68 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Complex credit system; enterprise pricing not published; steep jump from Pro to Enterprise” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
CodeSignal21%
12 of 57 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“When to avoid: If your organization handles thousands of candidates monthly or requires ironclad anti-cheating without heavy manual oversight.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Codility15%
9 of 61 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Limited testing capabilities due to unavailable APIs and restrictions on interviewer usage” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
TestGorilla38%
8 of 21 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“The pricing model is credit-based, which can become expensive at realistic hiring volumes.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 840 links across 211 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Codility57 answers · 149 citations · 14 models
vendor site · HackerRank44 answers · 79 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Coderbyte35 answers · 73 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CoderPad21 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CodeSignal16 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 8 models
8 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Testlify8 answers · 9 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Glider.ai8 answers · 8 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best coding assessment platform”, “coding assessment platform”, “technical assessment platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HackerRank hackerrank.com | 38% | 278 | 33,100 | 1,116 | 58,699 | 22 | 4 | |
| Codility codility.com | 21% | 235 | 3,600 | 114 | 3,042 | $108 | 3 | |
| Coderbyte coderbyte.com | 15% | 125 | 2,400 | 60 | 2,019 | 93 | ||
| CodeSignal codesignal.com | 11% | 179 | 14,800 | 548 | 152,420 | $5,323 | 23 | 9 |
| CoderPad coderpad.io | 4% | 95 | 18,100 | 269 | 34,657 | 9 | 2 | |
| HireVue hirevue.com | 4% | 348 | 14,800 | 1,147 | 35,611 | 14 | 6 | |
| HackerEarth Assessments hackerearth.com | 2% | 45 | 47,481 | 0 | 8 | |||
| TestDome testdome.com | 2% | 53 | 880 | 22 | 34,709 | 0 | ||
| CodeInterview codeinterview.io | 2% | 4 | ||||||
| CodeSignal Interview | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (coderpad.io, codesignal.com, glider.ai, hackerrank.com). The first result for “best coding assessment platform” is algocademy.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best coding assessment platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which technical interview tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade technical assessment platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best coding assessment platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a coding assessment platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which technical assessment platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HackerEarth Assessments, HackerRankno first choiceChangedno first choiceHackerRankno first choiceagainst: CoderPad
Three alternatives
CoderPad, Codility, DevSkillerTwo alternatives
Coderbyte, CodilityGPT-5.4 miniHackerRankHackerRankHeldCodeSignal, HackerRankCodilityno first choiceagainst: Codility, HireVue, Talview, TestGorilla
Two alternatives
CodeSignal, CodilityTwo alternatives
CoderPad, HireVueThree alternatives
Coderbyte, Karat, SHLOne alternative
HackerRankGemini 3.5 FlashHackerRankagainst: LeetCodeHackerRankHeldCodeSignal, HackerRankHackerRankno first choiceagainst: Mercer | Mettl, TestGorilla, Toggl Hire
Four alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, DevSkiller, KaratThree alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, KaratThree alternatives
CoderPad, Codility, KaratThree alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, CodilityPerplexity SonarHackerRankCodeSignal InterviewChangedagainst: HireVueHackerRankCoderbyteno first choiceagainst: HackerRank, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorilla, Vervoe, iMocha
Four alternatives
CodeSignal, Codility, HackerEarth Assessments, iMochaTwo alternatives
CoderPad, KaratSix alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility, Mercer | Mettl, iMochaOne alternative
HackerRankGrok 4.20HackerRankHackerRankHeldCodeSignal, Codility, HackerRankCoderbyteagainst: Adaface, CodeSignal, HackerEarth Assessments, TestGorillaCodilityagainst: CodeSignal, HackerRank, TestGorilla
Two alternatives
Coderbyte, CodilityFour alternatives
CodeSignal, Codility, Karat, iMochaTwo alternatives
Mercer | Mettl, iMochaTwo alternatives
Codility, HackerRankFour alternatives
CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank, TestGorillaMistral SmallCodeSignal, CodilityHackerRankChangedCodeSignal, CodilityCoderbyteagainst: Codility, HackerRankno first choiceagainst: CodeSignal, Codility, Examity, Honorlock, ProctorTrack, ProctorU, Proctorio, Respondus
Two alternatives
Coderbyte, HackerRankOne alternative
CodeSignalFour alternatives
Coderbyte, Criteria, HackerRank, LuGo-TestDeepSeek V4 FlashHackerRankCodilityChangedagainst: CoderPadHackerRankCoderbyteagainst: CodeSignal, Codility, HackerRankCodeSignal, CoderPad, Codilityagainst: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank, LeetCode
Four alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, Codility, Mercer | MettlTwo alternatives
CodeSignal, HackerRankSeven alternatives
CodeSignal, Coderbyte, Codility, Glider.ai, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorilla, WeCPLlama 4 MaverickCodeSignalHireVueChangedno first choiceCodilityCodeInterviewagainst: Augment Code, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, TestGorilla, iMocha
Four alternatives
CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility, HackerEarth AssessmentsFour alternatives
CodeSignal, Coderbyte, Codility, HackerRankThree alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, CodilityQwen 3.7 FlashCodeSignal, CodilityHireVueChangedCodilityCoderbyteagainst: CodeSignal, Codilityno first choiceagainst: LeetCode
Two alternatives
CoderPad, HackerEarth AssessmentsTwo alternatives
CoderPad, VervoeFour alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, HackerEarth Assessments, KaratOne alternative
HackerRankKimi K2HackerRankHackerRankHeldagainst: CodeSignalCodilityCoderbyteagainst: CodeSignalCodilityagainst: Coderbyte, Glider.aiagainst: Codility, HackerRank, TestGorilla
Two alternatives
CodeSignal, CodilityTwo alternatives
Codility, KaratThree alternatives
CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRankTwo alternatives
Codility, HackerRankThree alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, HackerRankGLM 4.7 FlashXCodilityCodeSignalChangedCodilityTestDomeagainst: CodeSignal, HackerEarth Assessments, HackerRank, Mercer | Mettlno first choiceagainst: Coderbyte, Codility, HackerEarth Assessments, Micro1, TestGorilla, eSkill
Four alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, HackerRank, InCruiter IncProctorThree alternatives
CoderPad, Codility, HackerRankSix alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, HackerRank, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorillaTwo alternatives
Coderbyte, CodilityMiniMax M2.5Coderbyte, CodilityCodility, HackerRankChangedno first choiceCodeSignalno first choiceagainst: HackerRank
One alternative
CoderPadOne alternative
IntervueTwo alternatives
Codility, HackerRankGPT-6 LunaHackerRankHackerRankHeldHackerRankHackerRankno first choiceagainst: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Codility, HackerRank, HireVue
Three alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, CodilityOne alternative
CoderPadFive alternatives
CodeSignal, CoderPad, Codility, HackerEarth Assessments, iMochaMuse Glimmer 30BHackerRankHackerRankHeldCodility, HackerRankCoderbyteagainst: CodeSignal, Codility, HackerRankCoderPadagainst: CodeSignal, HackerRank, Harver, HireVue
Two alternatives
CodeSignal, CodilityOne alternative
CodilityFour alternatives
CodeSignal, Coderbyte, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorillaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:00 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 16 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 7 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 17 | 284 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 20 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 24 | 64 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 7 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 14 | 70 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 6 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 20 | 70 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 1 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:22 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:53 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:15 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 13 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:22 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 19 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 24 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 23 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 22 | 238 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HackerEarth read as HackerEarth Assessments
Unresolved, counted raw
CodeSignal Interview
CodiMotion
FaceCode
Interview.io
Mercer \| Mettl
TalentRank
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.