Applicant tracking systems
Asked as “applicant tracking system”, and as “ATS”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Workable 16%
30Greenhouse16Workable14Breezy HR40others
30% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Greenhouse held the lead, −10 points on 40%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Breezy HR32%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Greenhouse30%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseGreenhouse42%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 37% → 42%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Breezy HR32%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketGreenhouse30%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseGreenhouse42%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 37% → 42%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Greenhouse30%9%57accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.40% → 30%
Greenhouse30%9%57accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.40% → 30%02
Workable16%5%42accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%
Workable16%5%42accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 9% → 16%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 16%03Breezy HR14%0%30accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 14%
Breezy HR14%0%30accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 14%04
Ashby11%2%41accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 10% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 11%
Ashby11%2%41accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 10% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 11%05
Zoho Recruit9%0%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 9%
Zoho Recruit9%0%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 9%06
Lever5%8%50accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
Lever5%8%50accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%07
100Hires4%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
100Hires4%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%08
Manatal4%7%14accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
Manatal4%7%14accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%09
JazzHR2%15%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
JazzHR2%15%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17
Oracle Taleo0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Taleo0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%16
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Workday Recruiting0%48%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%48%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
iCIMS0%36%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
iCIMS0%36%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
SmartRecruiters0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SmartRecruiters0%22%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
BambooHR0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%17%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Rippling0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Rippling0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Pinpoint0%0%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Pinpoint0%0%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Greenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs LeverGreenhouse vs 100HiresGreenhouse vs ManatalWorkable vs Breezy HRWorkable vs AshbyWorkable vs Zoho RecruitWorkable vs LeverWorkable vs 100HiresWorkable vs ManatalBreezy HR vs AshbyBreezy HR vs Zoho RecruitBreezy HR vs LeverBreezy HR vs 100HiresBreezy HR vs ManatalAshby vs Zoho RecruitAshby vs LeverAshby vs 100HiresAshby vs ManatalZoho Recruit vs LeverZoho Recruit vs 100HiresZoho Recruit vs ManatalLever vs 100HiresLever vs Manatal100Hires vs Manatal
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314151617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Greenhouse30%
Greenhouse30%02Workable16%
Workable16%03Breezy HR14%
Breezy HR14%04Ashby11%
Ashby11%05Zoho Recruit9%
Zoho Recruit9%06Lever5%
Lever5%07100Hires4%
100Hires4%08Manatal4%
Manatal4%09JazzHR2%
JazzHR2%10Pinpoint0%
Pinpoint0%11BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%12Rippling0%
Rippling0%13SmartRecruiters0%
SmartRecruiters0%14iCIMS0%
iCIMS0%15Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%16SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting0%17Oracle Taleo0%
Oracle Taleo0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday Recruiting48%
12 of 25 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Workday is the most frequently criticized ATS based on user feedback... Many recruiters and candidates describe it as one of the "worst" systems” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Oracle Taleo100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Frequently criticized for being clunky, unreliable, and frustrating for both recruiters and candidates” Kimi K2, negative prompt
iCIMS36%
8 of 22 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“notoriously complex to implement (often taking 6-12 months), expensive to maintain, with high licensing and professional services costs, and difficult to use” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting70%
7 of 10 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise suites (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro)” Kimi K2, scale prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 714 links across 206 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
31 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group29 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lever24 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier20 answers · 20 citations · 12 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
vendor site · 100Hires11 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Greenhouse10 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Rework9 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
9 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 4 models
9 answers · 3 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “applicant tracking system”, “applicant tracking systems”, “best applicant tracking system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 30% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 |
| Workable workable.com | 16% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 |
| Breezy breezy.hr Breezy HR 14% | 14% | 226 | 3,600 | 59 | 178,670 company | $56 | 25 |
| Ashby ashbyhq.com | 11% | 217 | 49,500 | 3,112 | 216,820 | 16 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 9% | 9% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 |
| Lever lever.co | 5% | 221 | 60,500 | 24,663 | 189,552 | $657 | 7 |
| 100Hires 100hires.com | 4% | 123 | 90 | 2 | 705 | 4 | |
| Manatal manatal.com | 4% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | |
| JazzHR jazzhr.com | 2% | 141 | 14,800 | 70 | 11,754 | 19 | |
| ApplicantStack applicantstack.com | 2% | 19 | 1,000 | 1 | 106,792 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (zapier.com). The first result for “applicant tracking system” is technologyadvice.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best applicant tracking system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ATS would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top applicant tracking systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best applicant tracking system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an applicant tracking system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which applicant tracking systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceGreenhouse, WorkableChangedGreenhouseManatalno first choiceagainst: JazzHR, Workable, iCIMS
Five alternatives
BambooHR, Greenhouse, Jobvite, Lever, WorkableTwo alternatives
Lever, PinpointSix alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, JazzHR, Lever, Manatal, WorkableThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, Zoho RecruitGPT-5.4 miniGreenhouseagainst: SmartRecruiters, iCIMSGreenhouseHeldagainst: SmartRecruitersno first choiceApplicantStack, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: ApplicantStack, BambooHR
Two alternatives
Lever, WorkableThree alternatives
Ashby, Lever, WorkableGemini 3.5 FlashAshbyagainst: BambooHR, RipplingAshbyHeldagainst: BambooHR ATS, RipplingGreenhouseBreezy HR, Zoho RecruitAshbyagainst: IBM Kenexa BrassRing, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, PinpointFour alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, WorkableSix alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, Lever, Workable, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSTwo alternatives
JazzHR, ManatalFive alternatives
BambooHR, Greenhouse, Lever, Rippling, SmartRecruitersPerplexity SonarGreenhouseGreenhouseHeldGreenhouseJazzHRno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Jobvite, Lever, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Four alternatives
Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, WorkableFour alternatives
Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, WorkableNine alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, JazzHR, Lever, Pinpoint, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, Workable, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitGrok 4.20Greenhouseagainst: Oracle, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSGreenhouseHeldWorkableBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: Crelate, JobAdder, Loxo, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Ashby, WorkableSix alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, Lever, Pinpoint, Teamtailor, WorkableNine alternatives
Ashby, Breezy HR, Greenhouse, Lever, Rippling, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, Zoho Recruit, iCIMSFour alternatives
100Hires, Harmny Recruiting, Workello, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, LeverMistral SmallWorkableWorkableHeldLever, Workable100Hires, Zoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Workday RecruitingTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHRDeepSeek V4 FlashAshbyGreenhouseChangedno first choice100HiresGreenhouseagainst: iCIMSagainst: Bullhorn, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, UKG Pro, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, LeverThree alternatives
Ashby, Lever, WorkableEight alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint, Workable, Zoho Recruit, iCIMSThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Manatal, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
JazzHR, Lever, WorkableLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceRecruit CRMChangedno first choiceagainst: Ashby, RecruiteeManatalno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, Pinpoint, TeamtailorThree alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStack, Zoho RecruitQwen 3.7 FlashAshby, GreenhouseGreenhouseChangediCIMSZoho Recruitagainst: Greenhouse, LeverGreenhouse, Leveragainst: Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruitingagainst: Bullhorn, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, UKG Pro, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Two alternatives
Lever, SmartRecruitersTwo alternatives
Ashby, LeverSeven alternatives
100Hires, Greenhouse, Lever, Rippling, Workable, Workday Recruiting, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, JazzHRThree alternatives
Ashby, Personio, RipplingKimi K2Greenhouseagainst: SmartRecruiters, Workable, Workday RecruitingLeverChangedGreenhouse, Leveragainst: Oracle, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday RecruitingBreezy HR, Zoho RecruitRecruitee, Workableagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, UKG Pro, Workday Recruitingagainst: Oracle Taleo, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS
Two alternatives
Ashby, LeverTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, WorkableTwo alternatives
Workable, iCIMSTwo alternatives
100Hires, JazzHRTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, LeverGLM 4.7 FlashXBreezy HR, Workableagainst: Greenhouse, LeverWorkableChangedWorkableBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: Avature, Bullhorn, Crelate, Lever, Loxo, Manatal, Oracle Taleo, Ultra-Staff EDGE, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Ashby, CrelateTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, LeverEight alternatives
100Hires, Ashby, BambooHR, Breezy HR, Greenhouse, Lever, Rippling, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
100Hires, Indeed, Zoho RecruitMiniMax M2.5Breezy HR, WorkableGreenhouseChangedno first choiceBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: BrassRingagainst: BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHRTwo alternatives
Ashby, WorkableFour alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStack, Manatal, Zoho RecruitGPT-6 LunaAshbyGreenhouseChangedGreenhouseDoverno first choiceagainst: TalentHook
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, LeverThree alternatives
Ashby, Lever, WorkableSix alternatives
Ashby, Bullhorn, Lever, Workable, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitMuse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Lever, Workableagainst: JazzHRGreenhouse, WorkableChangedGreenhouse, LeverBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: Avature, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Ashby, BambooHRTwo alternatives
Lever, PinpointSeven alternatives
100Hires, Ashby, BambooHR, Breezy HR, Rippling, Workable, Workday RecruitingFour alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStack, Manatal, Zoho RecruitBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:10 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 21 | 63 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 16 | 68 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 17 | 140 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 12 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 13 | 81 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:53 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:42 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:50 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:40 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:35 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 22 | 136 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Breezy read as Breezy HR
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Taleo read as Oracle Taleo
Taleo (Oracle) read as Oracle Taleo
UKG Pro Recruiting read as UKG Pro
UKG Pro Recruiting (formerly Kronos/UltiPro) read as UKG Pro
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS
Unresolved, counted raw
Comeet
TalentHook
Ultra-Staff EDGE
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.