Recruiting CRM and sourcing
Asked as “candidate sourcing tool”, and as “recruiting CRM”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · hireEZ 12%
20Gem12hireEZ08Lever61others
20% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Gem held the lead, +5 points on 15%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Juicebox18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Juicebox (18%) replaces Manatal (25% then, 12% now), 6 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Gem20%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
SeekOut21%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 18% → 21%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Juicebox18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Juicebox (18%) replaces Manatal (25% then, 12% now), 6 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketGem20%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseSeekOut21%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 18% → 21%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Gem20%3%35accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 20%
Gem20%3%35accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 20%02
hireEZ12%3%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%
hireEZ12%3%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%03
Manatal8%0%19accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%
Manatal8%0%19accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%04
Lever8%0%21accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%
Lever8%0%21accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%05
LinkedIn Recruiter6%20%30accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
LinkedIn Recruiter6%20%30accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%06
Ashby6%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Ashby6%0%12accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%07Fetcher4%6%18accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
08
Zoho Recruit4%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Zoho Recruit4%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%09
Pin4%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Pin4%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%10SeekOut2%3%31accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
SeekOut2%3%31accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%11
Greenhouse2%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Greenhouse2%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%12Juicebox2%6%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Juicebox2%6%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
ContactOut0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ContactOut0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Gem vs LinkedIn RecruiterGem vs AshbyGem vs FetcherGem vs Zoho RecruithireEZ vs ManatalhireEZ vs LeverhireEZ vs LinkedIn RecruiterhireEZ vs AshbyhireEZ vs FetcherhireEZ vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs LeverManatal vs LinkedIn RecruiterManatal vs AshbyManatal vs FetcherManatal vs Zoho RecruitLever vs LinkedIn RecruiterLever vs AshbyLever vs FetcherLever vs Zoho RecruitLinkedIn Recruiter vs AshbyLinkedIn Recruiter vs FetcherLinkedIn Recruiter vs Zoho RecruitAshby vs FetcherAshby vs Zoho RecruitFetcher vs Zoho Recruit
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506F07
080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Gem20%
Gem20%02hireEZ12%
hireEZ12%03Manatal8%
Manatal8%04Lever8%
Lever8%05LinkedIn Recruiter6%
LinkedIn Recruiter6%06Ashby6%
Ashby6%07Fetcher4%
08Zoho Recruit4%
Zoho Recruit4%09Pin4%
Pin4%10SeekOut2%
SeekOut2%11Greenhouse2%
Greenhouse2%12Juicebox2%
Juicebox2%13ContactOut0%
ContactOut0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
LinkedIn Recruiter20%
6 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“LinkedIn doesn't publish a standard price, so compare a quote rather than assuming it's the cheapest” GPT-6 Luna, budget prompt
SAP Ariba60%
3 of 5 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“strategic sourcing software that are not recommended for small B2B companies, such as SAP Ariba, Coupa, and Jaggaer, due to their complexity and high total cost of ownership” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Bullhorn60%
3 of 5 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid for Your Use Case - Recruit CRM / Bullhorn / Tracker RMS” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Recruit CRM43%
3 of 7 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid for Your Use Case - Recruit CRM / Bullhorn / Tracker RMS” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 715 links across 243 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Lever32 answers · 43 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group29 answers · 65 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Pin16 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Leonar14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · FirstHR13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · LinkedIn11 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
10 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Gem10 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
10 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
22 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best candidate sourcing tool”, “candidate sourcing tool”, “sourcing tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem gem.com | 20% | 182 | 246,000 | 225,116 | 16,291 | 10 | ||
| hireEZ hireez.com | 12% | 174 | 2,400 | 43 | 3,058 | 35 | ||
| Manatal manatal.com | 8% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | ||
| Lever lever.co | 8% | 221 | 60,500 | 24,663 | 189,552 | $657 | 7 | |
| LinkedIn parent site LinkedIn Recruiter 6% | 6% | 108 | 11,100,000 | 77,031 | ||||
| Ashby ashbyhq.com | 6% | 217 | 49,500 | 3,112 | 216,820 | 16 | ||
| Crelate crelate.com | 6% | 65 | 2,400 | 41 | 6,935 | $2,457 | 12 | |
| Fetcher | 4% | 2,900 | 113 | |||||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 4% | 4% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Pin pin.com | 4% | 104 | 368,000 | 243,385 | 24,375 | 28 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (linkedin.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, pin.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best candidate sourcing tool” is hiretruffle.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best candidate sourcing tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruiting CRM would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top sourcing tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best candidate sourcing tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a candidate sourcing tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which sourcing tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceChangedPinJuiceboxno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Apollo.io, ZoomInfoSix alternatives
AmazingHiring, Ashby, ContactOut, Gem, SeekOut, hireEZThree alternatives
Fetcher, Manatal, SeekOutGPT-5.4 miniGemLeverChangedLinkedIn RecruiterManatalno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
LinkedIn Recruiter, Loxo, SeekOut, hireEZThree alternatives
Ashby, Gem, GreenhouseSeven alternatives
AmazingHiring, Clay, Entelo, Gem, PhantomBuster, SeekOut, hireEZTwo alternatives
Jobin.cloud, LinkedIn RecruiterGemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn RecruiterGemChangedGem, LinkedIn RecruiterManatalagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Fetcher, Findem, SeekOut, ZoomInfo Talent, hireEZThree alternatives
Ashby, Fetcher, LeverFive alternatives
Beamery, ContactOut, Lusha, SeekOut, hireEZEight alternatives
Apollo.io, GitHub, HeroHunt.ai, Juicebox, Pin, Recruit'Em, Stack Overflow, WellfoundPerplexity SonarhireEZLeverChangedagainst: Recruit CRM, SmartRecruitersno first choiceManatalagainst: SeekOutno first choiceagainst: Alibaba, Global Sources, ZoomInfo
Four alternatives
Gem, Lever, SeekOut, WorkableThree alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, WorkableNine alternatives
Fetcher, Gem, Juicebox, LinkedIn Recruiter, Loxo, Noon, SeekOut, Wellfound, hireEZOne alternative
PinGrok 4.20hireEZagainst: FetcherCrelateChangedagainst: Avature, Beamery, Bullhorn, HubSpot CRM, Loxo, Phenom, Pipedrive, Recruit CRM, SalesflareLinkedIn RecruiterGoogle X-Ray Search, LinkedInno first choiceagainst: HireVue, LinkedIn's tools, Recruiterflow, ZoomInfo
Two alternatives
Findem, SeekOutThree alternatives
Ashby, Manatal, Zoho RecruitNine alternatives
Coresignal, Deel Hire, Dice, Indeed Smart Sourcing, Lever, Manatal, Recruit CRM, SeekOut, hireEZFive alternatives
Juicebox, Manatal, Pin, Recruit'Em, Zoho RecruitMistral SmallGem, hireEZAshbyChangedno first choiceLinkedInagainst: Juiceboxno first choiceagainst: Coupa Sourcing, GEP SMART, SAP Ariba
Two alternatives
Fetcher, FindemThree alternatives
Crelate, Zoho Recruit, folk CRMFive alternatives
Augtal, GitHub, Indeed Resume, Recruit'Em, Stack OverflowDeepSeek V4 FlashhireEZLeverChangedagainst: Bullhorn, Gem, Recruit CRM, SmartRecruiters, Tracker RMS, iCIMSno first choiceZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: LinkedIn Recruiteragainst: Alibaba, Global Sources, Helium 10, ImportYeti, Jungle Scout, Keepa, Panjiva, Volza, Zauba
Four alternatives
Fetcher, Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOutThree alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Gem, Juicebox, WellfoundLlama 4 MaverickFetcher, Findem, Gem, hireEZAshbyChangedno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: Coupa Sourcing, Jaggaer, SAP Ariba
Three alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, LeverTwo alternatives
Fetcher, PinQwen 3.7 FlashGemAshbyChangedno first choiceBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choiceagainst: Oracle Cloud Procurement, SAP S/4HANA
Four alternatives
ContactOut, Fetcher, Lusha, hireEZFour alternatives
Crelate, Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Juicebox, Manatal, PinKimi K2Gemagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterGreenhouse, LeverChangedagainst: iCIMSno first choiceBreezy HR, RecruitingCRMno first choiceagainst: HireVue
Two alternatives
SeekOut, hireEZTwo alternatives
Workable, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Apollo.io, Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter, SeekOut, hireEZFour alternatives
GitHub Search, LinkedIn Basic Search, Manatal, Zoho RecruitGLM 4.7 FlashXFetcher, GemRecruit CRMChangedagainst: BullhornGem, SeekOut, hireEZagainst: ZoomInfono first choiceno first choiceagainst: ContactOut, Cyber Focus AI, CyberCoders, Data.com, DiscoverOrg, InsideView, Jobgether, Jobleads, Jobot, LeadIQ, Lensa, Mercor, NetProspex, RemoteHunter, SignalHire, Swooped, Talentify, ZoomInfo
One alternative
hireEZTwo alternatives
Ashby, RecruiterflowSeven alternatives
Apollo.io, ContactOut, Greenhouse, Kaspr, Lever, LinkedIn Recruiter, LushaEleven alternatives
Amor, ContactOut, GitHub, Google X-Ray Search, Indeed Resume, Juicebox, Manatal, Pin, Recruit CRM, SignalHire, Stack Overflow Jobs & TalentMiniMax M2.5Gem, SeekOutagainst: LinkedIn RecruiterCrelateChangedno first choiceRecruitingCRMno first choiceagainst: hireEZ
Three alternatives
Fetcher, Juicebox, hireEZThree alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
AmazingHiring, Gem, LinkedIn Recruiter, Loxo, SeekOut, hireEZFour alternatives
Dover, Indeed, Manatal, WorkableGPT-6 LunaLinkedIn RecruiterGemChangedLinkedIn RecruiterPinagainst: LinkedIn Recruiterno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Gem, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Ashby, LeverFive alternatives
AmazingHiring, Gem, Juicebox, SeekOut, hireEZOne alternative
WellfoundMuse Glimmer 30BGem, hireEZCrelateChangedSeekOutPinno first choiceagainst: Alibaba, SAP Ariba
Five alternatives
Fetcher, Findem, Humanly, Manatal, TheHireHub.AITwo alternatives
Manatal, Zoho RecruitSeven alternatives
Beamery, Fetcher, Juicebox, LinkedIn Recruiter, PeopleGPT, Pin, hireEZTwo alternatives
Juicebox, ManatalBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:31 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 14 | 76 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:29 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:16 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 6 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 10 | 114 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:18 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:22 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:55 | no | 0 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 15 | 82 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 7 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 25 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:48 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Apollo read as Apollo.io
Coupa read as Coupa Sourcing
Google X-Ray read as Google X-Ray Search
HubSpot read as HubSpot CRM
Recruit'Em read as Recruit'Em
Recruit'Em (Free) read as Recruit'Em
Recruit'em read as Recruit'Em
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS
Unresolved, counted raw
Amor
Ashby CRM
Clay
Connectifier
Data.com
DiscoverOrg
Helium 10
Icertis
ImportYeti
InsideView
Jungle Scout
Kaspr
Keepa
LeadIQ
LinkedIn Basic Search
LinkedIn's tools
NetProspex
NinjaHire
Oracle Cloud Procurement
Oracle Procurement Cloud
Panjiva
PhantomBuster
Recruit CRM Free Tool
SAP S/4HANA
Sales Navigator
Stack Overflow Jobs & Talent
Volza
Zauba
folk CRM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.