AI recruiting assistants
Asked as “AI recruiter”, and as “AI-powered candidate screening tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Manatal 21%
23Workable21Manatal15Ashby42others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workable (23%) replaces Manatal (31% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Workable leads at 23%, replacing Manatal, which led at 31% and stands at 21% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal30%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 29% → 30%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Workable23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workable (23%) replaces Manatal (31% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Eightfold AI25%Contested▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →
Manatal30%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 29% → 30%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketWorkable23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workable (23%) replaces Manatal (31% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterpriseEightfold AI25%Contested▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Workable23%3%33accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 23%
Workable23%3%33accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 23%02Manatal21%0%24accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 31% → 21%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.31% → 21%
Manatal21%0%24accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 31% → 21%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.31% → 21%03
Ashby15%7%28accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 15%
Ashby15%7%28accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 15%04
Greenhouse8%12%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%
Greenhouse8%12%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%05
Zoho Recruit6%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
Zoho Recruit6%0%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%06
Gem4%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Gem4%5%19accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%07
Paradox2%19%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Paradox2%19%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Workday Recruiting0%73%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%73%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
HireVue0%35%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
HireVue0%35%26criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10Eightfold AI0%24%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Eightfold AI0%24%21accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Lever0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Lever0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
SeekOut0%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SeekOut0%0%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
hireEZ0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
hireEZ0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Workable vs Zoho RecruitWorkable vs GemWorkable vs ParadoxManatal vs AshbyManatal vs GreenhouseManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs GemManatal vs ParadoxAshby vs GreenhouseAshby vs Zoho RecruitAshby vs GemAshby vs ParadoxGreenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs ParadoxZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs ParadoxGem vs Paradox
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Workable23%
Workable23%02Manatal21%
Manatal21%03Ashby15%
Ashby15%04Greenhouse8%
Greenhouse8%05Zoho Recruit6%
Zoho Recruit6%06Gem4%
Gem4%07Paradox2%
Paradox2%08SeekOut0%
SeekOut0%09hireEZ0%
hireEZ0%10Eightfold AI0%
Eightfold AI0%11Lever0%
Lever0%12HireVue0%
HireVue0%13Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HireVue35%
9 of 26 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“HireVue faced a formal complaint to the FTC ... alleging its AI-driven hiring assessment used opaque, unproven algorithms ... creating a risk of discriminatory hiring practices and privacy violations.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Workday Recruiting73%
8 of 11 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Workday has faced significant legal scrutiny. In the case *Mobley v. Workday*, applicants alleged the platform's AI tools discriminated against older workers, minorities, and disabled individuals” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
iTutorGroup
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“iTutorGroup faced an EEOC lawsuit for using AI that allegedly discriminated against older workers and female applicants through automated screening” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Paradox19%
4 of 21 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Commentary on the use notes these recruiting aids tend to "screen out" people with little-known developmental or learning disabilities, raising accessibility and disparate impact concerns.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 770 links across 281 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Hirevire14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lever13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Greenhouse12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 15 citations · 5 models
vendor site · HeroHunt.ai10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Rework10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Paycor8 answers · 9 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 10 models
8 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 6 models
7 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 3 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai recruiter”, “ai recruiting tools”, “best ai recruiter”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workable workable.com | 23% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 |
| Manatal manatal.com | 21% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | |
| Ashby ashbyhq.com | 15% | 217 | 49,500 | 3,112 | 216,820 | 16 | |
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 8% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 6% | 6% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 |
| Gem gem.com | 4% | 182 | 246,000 | 225,116 | 16,291 | 10 | |
| Leelu AI leelu.ai | 4% | 6 | |||||
| TheHireHub.AI thehirehub.ai | 4% | 3 | |||||
| Paradox paradox.ai | 2% | 199 | 165,000 | 27,047 | 62,844 | 2 | |
| Hirevire hirevire.com | 2% | 51 | 210 | 0 | 444 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “ai recruiter” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best AI recruiter for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI-powered candidate screening tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top AI recruiting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI recruiter for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an AI recruiter. What should we look at?”Negative“Which AI recruiting tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AshbyWorkableChangedno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: HireVue, Workday Recruiting, iTutorGroup
Three alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, LeverThree alternatives
GoPerfect, Pinpoint, XobinFour alternatives
Juicebox, Qureos, Recooty, Zoho RecruitGPT-5.4 miniAshby, GreenhouseGreenhouseChangedno first choice100Hiresno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Ceipal, Lever, Recruiterflow, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
A·Minds, Lever, TestGorilla, Testlify, WorkableEleven alternatives
Ashby, Eightfold AI, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, HiredScore, Lever, Paradox, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZTwo alternatives
TalentHR, Zoho RecruitGemini 3.5 FlashGem, Juiceboxagainst: Eightfold AI, PhenomParadoxChangedagainst: Eightfold AIno first choiceManatalagainst: Eightfold AI, Paradoxno first choiceagainst: Amazon, HireVue, Workday Recruiting, iTutorGroup
Four alternatives
Ashby, Fetcher, Findem, MetaviewThree alternatives
Ashby, TestGorilla, hireEZTen alternatives
Ashby, Eightfold AI, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, Humanly, Metaview, Paradox, SeekOut, hireEZSeven alternatives
ChatGPT, Claude, EasyHire.me, Pin, Skima.AI, Truffle, Zoho RecruitPerplexity SonarAshbyagainst: Noon AI, PinWorkableChangedagainst: HireVueno first choiceManatalno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, LeverFour alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, SeekOut, VervoeTen alternatives
Ashby, BrightHire, Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, HireVue, Manatal, Paradox, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZFour alternatives
Fetcher, Juicebox, Pin, Zoho RecruitGrok 4.20RecruiterflowWorkableChangedagainst: Greenhouse, LeverhireEZManatalno first choiceagainst: Amazon's AI Recruiting Tool, Ashby, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Paradox, Phenom, Textkernel, Workday Recruiting, iTutorGroup
Six alternatives
Ashby, Braintrust AIR, Findem, Greenhouse, HireVue, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Hirevire, Leelu AISeven alternatives
BrightHire, Eightfold AI, HireVue, Hirevire, Humanly, Paradox, SeekOutThree alternatives
Freshteam, Hirevire, Zoho RecruitMistral SmallGreenhouse, Workableagainst: Gem, ParadoxWorkableChangedno first choiceManatal, Workableno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, HirevireTwo alternatives
EasyHire.me, MetaviewDeepSeek V4 FlashGemAshbyChangedMetaviewManatalno first choiceagainst: Amazon's internal AI recruiting tool, HireVue, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, SeekOut, WorkableThree alternatives
Greenhouse, SeekOut, WorkableThirteen alternatives
Ashby, Eightfold AI, Fetcher, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, Juicebox, Manatal, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZFour alternatives
EasyHire, JazzHR, Noon AI, Zoho RecruitLlama 4 MaverickTheHireHub.AIBreezy IntelligenceChangedno first choiceHirevireno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Humanly, WorkableFour alternatives
AgentR, Willo, Workable, XinterviewTwo alternatives
Manatal, QureosQwen 3.7 FlashAshbyagainst: Talemonde, Workday RecruitingLeelu AIChangedEightfold AIFetcher, Skima.AI, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Ashby, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
Gem, HireVue, Paradox, X-TeamTwo alternatives
RoundOne AI, WorkableFour alternatives
Gloat, HireVue, Paradox, PymetricsTwo alternatives
Manatal, RecootyKimi K2Ashbyagainst: GreenhouseWorkableChangedno first choiceEasyHire.me, Manatalno first choiceagainst: HireVue, Pymetrics, Workday Recruiting
One alternative
WorkableFour alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, ParadoxSeven alternatives
Eightfold AI, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, Paradox, SeekOut, hireEZTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, HirevireGLM 4.7 FlashXTheHireHub.AIManatal, WorkableChangedno first choiceZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Curious Thing, HireVue, Retorio, myInterview
Four alternatives
Gem, Leelu AI, Workable, hireEZTwo alternatives
Breezy Intelligence, GreenhouseThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, ManatalMiniMax M2.5Leelu AI, WorkableWorkableChangedno first choiceManatal, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Workday Recruiting, iTutorGroup
Three alternatives
Braintrust AIR, HRBlade, SeekOutThree alternatives
Greenhouse, Leelu AI, ManatalSeven alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVue, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, HirevireGPT-6 LunaAshbyAshbyHeldno first choiceManatalagainst: Workableno first choicenothing named
One alternative
GemOne alternative
GreenhouseSeven alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, HireVue, Paradox, SeekOut, Workable, hireEZOne alternative
Zoho RecruitMuse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Workableagainst: Eightfold AIWorkableChangedParadox, Taskade Genesisagainst: HeroHunt.aiManatalno first choiceagainst: Amazon's former AI recruiting engine, HireVue, Paradox
Three alternatives
Paradox, SeekOut, hireEZOne alternative
AshbyFifteen alternatives
Ashby, Eightfold AI, Findem, Greenhouse, HireVue, JazzHR, Juicebox, Lever, Manatal, PeopleGPT, Recruitee, SeekOut, Workable, Zoho Recruit, hireEZThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Hirevire, WorkableBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:40 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 24 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 15 | 173 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 14 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:37 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:28 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:12 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 23 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
Greenhouse AI read as Greenhouse
Noon read as Noon AI
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Zoho read as Zoho Recruit
Unresolved, counted raw
AgentR
Amazon's former AI recruiting engine
Amazon's internal AI recruiting tool
A·Minds
Curious Thing
GapJumpers
Gild
Lever or Greenhouse (with AI add-ons)
RecruitRyte
Skima.AI
Talemonde
Workable AI
X-Team
Xinterview
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.