CPQ for small business buyers
Asked as “CPQ software”, and as “configure, price, quote tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45PandaDoc09HubSpot Commerce Hub09Proposify36others
45% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.PandaDoc held the lead, ±0 points on 45%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc45%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
DealHub51%Clear leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Salesforce Revenue Cloud57%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 49% → 57%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
PandaDoc45%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketDealHub51%Clear leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSalesforce Revenue Cloud57%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 49% → 57%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PandaDoc45%3%64endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 45%
PandaDoc45%3%64endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.45% → 45%02
Proposify9%0%37accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 3% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 9%
Proposify9%0%37accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 3% → 9%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 9%03
HubSpot Commerce Hub9%5%41accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%
HubSpot Commerce Hub9%5%41accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%05
QuoteWerks4%0%33accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 14% → 4%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 4%
QuoteWerks4%0%33accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 14% → 4%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 4%06
Qwilr4%0%27accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Qwilr4%0%27accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%07
Conga CPQ2%58%26criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Conga CPQ2%58%26criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Oracle CPQ0%95%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle CPQ0%95%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10SAP CPQ0%89%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Salesforce Revenue Cloud0%86%57criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud0%86%57criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08DealHub0%18%40accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.12% → 0%
DealHub0%18%40accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.12% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
DealHub vs Conga CPQDealHub vs ProposifyDealHub vs QuoteWerksPandaDoc vs HubSpot Commerce HubPandaDoc vs Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc vs Conga CPQPandaDoc vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs QuoteWerksHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Conga CPQHubSpot Commerce Hub vs ProposifyHubSpot Commerce Hub vs QuoteWerksSalesforce Revenue Cloud vs Conga CPQSalesforce Revenue Cloud vs ProposifySalesforce Revenue Cloud vs QuoteWerksConga CPQ vs ProposifyConga CPQ vs QuoteWerksProposify vs QuoteWerks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203i04
0506070809S10
11Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01PandaDoc45%
PandaDoc45%02Proposify9%
Proposify9%03HubSpot Commerce Hub9%
HubSpot Commerce Hub9%04iQuoteXpress8%
05QuoteWerks4%
QuoteWerks4%06Qwilr4%
Qwilr4%07Conga CPQ2%
Conga CPQ2%08DealHub0%
DealHub0%09Oracle CPQ0%
Oracle CPQ0%10SAP CPQ0%
11Salesforce Revenue Cloud0%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud86%
49 of 57 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 25 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid overly complex enterprise-grade solutions... Tools like Agentforce Revenue Management and Oracle CPQ are best for large enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
SAP CPQ
89%
24 of 27 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 17 hard negative
“Full enterprise tools like Oracle CPQ (~$240+/user/mo) or SAP CPQ are generally not recommended here due to complexity and cost.” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Oracle CPQ95%
21 of 22 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 16 hard negative
“Full enterprise tools like Oracle CPQ (~$240+/user/mo) or SAP CPQ are generally not recommended here due to complexity and cost.” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Conga CPQ58%
15 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Reviews highlight it as better for mid-to-large companies; small businesses may find the initial effort and potential bugs not worth it” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 784 links across 148 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice54 answers · 91 citations · 11 models
46 answers · 81 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Albato37 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra27 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PandaDoc22 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Spotsaas17 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Salesbricks17 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Turnstile11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · QuoteWerks10 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
48 answers · 11 models
39 answers · 11 models
37 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cpq software”, “cpq software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 45% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | |
| HubSpot parent site HubSpot Commerce Hub 9%, HubSpot CRM 2%, HubSpot Sales Hub 0% | 11% | 687 | 368,000 | 9,776 | ||||
| Proposify proposify.com | 9% | 259 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | ||
| iQuoteXpress iquotexpress.com | 8% | 24 | ||||||
| QuoteWerks quotewerks.com QuoteWerks 4%, QuoteWerks Web 2%, QuoteWerks Web Essential 2% | 8% | 66 | 1,300 | 22 | 3,244 | 27 | 5 | |
| Qwilr qwilr.com | 4% | 196 | 4,400 | 23 | 10,837 | 27 | ||
| Bitrix24 bitrix24.com | 2% | 49 | 5,400 | 90 | 69,160 | 104 | ||
| Paperless Parts | 2% | |||||||
| Multiply | 2% | |||||||
| PROS pros.com PROS Pricing 2% | 2% | 3 | 17,307 company | 1 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, quotewerks.com, salesbricks.com). The first result for “best cpq software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CPQ software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which configure, price, quote tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top CPQ tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CPQ software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a CPQ software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CPQ tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc, QuoteWerksChangedPandaDocHubSpot CRMno first choiceagainst: DealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, Salesforce Revenue CloudFour alternatives
DealHub, Dock, HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerksThree alternatives
PandaDoc, Proposify, QuoteWerksGPT-5.4 miniPandaDocagainst: Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce HubChangedagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hubagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
DealHub, QuoteWerksOne alternative
QuoteWerksThree alternatives
DealHub, PandaDoc, QuoteWerksGemini 3.5 FlashPandaDocagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocHeldagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicePandaDocagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Conga CPQ, Model N, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Six alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerks, Quoter, Salesbricks, Zoho CPQFour alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Sales Hub, QuoteWorks, QwilrFive alternatives
HubSpot Sales Hub, QuoteWerks, Qwilr, Zoho CPQ, Zoho OneSeven alternatives
Cacheflow, DealHub, HubSpot Sales Hub, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, SubskribePerplexity SonarPandaDocPandaDocHeldagainst: Better Proposals, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Quotient, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc, QuoteWerksagainst: DealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudQuoteWerksagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Revalize, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Six alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, QuoteWerks, Qwilr, Salesbricks, TurnstileTwo alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerksThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Quotient, QwilrTwo alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocGrok 4.20PandaDocagainst: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocHeldagainst: Conga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, TurnstilePandaDocagainst: Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, ServiceNow CPQ
Four alternatives
DealHub, QuoteWerks, Qwilr, Vendori CPQFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, Qwilr, iQuoteXpressThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, Salesforce Revenue CloudFive alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, QuoteWerks, Qwilr, iQuoteXpressFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocMistral SmallQwilrConga CPQ, iQuoteXpressChangedagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubPandaDoc, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Bigmachines, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocTwo alternatives
Salesbricks, Vendori CPQTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ProposifyThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Multiply, Paperless PartsDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDocagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocHeldPandaDoc, Quotientagainst: Conga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudProposify, iQuoteXpressagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerksFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, Nutshell, Proposify, QuoteWerksOne alternative
DealHubTwo alternatives
Bitrix24, MRPeasyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceMultiply, PROS Pricing, Paperless Partsno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Two alternatives
PandaDoc, ProposifyQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDocagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocHeldagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc, ProposifyPandaDocagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, iQuoteXpressFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, Vendori CPQ, iQuoteXpressFour alternatives
Apparound / Expedite Commerce, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Vendori CPQFour alternatives
Everstage, Proposify, QuoteWerks, Zoho QuotesKimi K2PandaDoc, Proposifyagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocChangedagainst: Conga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: DealHub, MonetizeNow, Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Proposifyagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Revenue Hub CPQThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerks, iQuoteXpressFour alternatives
ConnectWise CPQ, DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerksFour alternatives
Bitrix24, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, TurboQuote by TurboDocxTwo alternatives
DealHub, Zoho CRMGLM 4.7 FlashXPandaDocPloomes CRMChangedDealHub, PandaDocagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSolSuiteno first choiceagainst: Conga Advantage CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, MonetizeNow, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, ServiceNow CPQ
Six alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, Qwilr, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TurnstileFour alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Proposify, QwilrSix alternatives
Better Proposals, ConvertSite, GetAccept, Pipedrive Smart Docs, Proposify, QuoteWerksFour alternatives
PandaDoc, Ploomes CRM, Proposify, iQuoteXpressMiniMax M2.5Proposify, Qwilragainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocChangedPandaDoc, Proposifyagainst: Vendori CPQBitrix24, PandaDoc, iQuoteXpressno first choiceagainst: HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Two alternatives
Hive CPQ Online Product Configurator, PandaDocTwo alternatives
Proposify, QuotientThree alternatives
DealHub, Hive CPQ, VividWorksThree alternatives
HubSpot CRM, Odoo, QwilrFive alternatives
CPQ Cloud / Infor, DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Tacton, VendavoGPT-6 LunaHubSpot Commerce HubQuoteWerks WebChangedQuoteWerks, Zoho CPQagainst: DealHubQuoteWerks Web Essentialagainst: PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
DealHub, PandaDocThree alternatives
Balanced, HubSpot Commerce Hub, QwilrTwo alternatives
HubSpot Revenue Hub CPQ, PandaDocOne alternative
Zoho CRMMuse Glimmer 30BHubSpot Commerce HubPandaDocChangedPandaDocagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPloomes CRM CPQ add-on, iQuoteXpressno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Epicor CPQ, Infor CPQ, NetSuite CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Six alternatives
DealHub, PandaDoc, Proposify, QuoteWerks, Turnstile, iQuoteXpressTwo alternatives
QuoteWerks, iQuoteXpressFive alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Pipedrive CPQ and Quoter, Proposify, Vendori CPQFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, MRPeasy, PandaDoc, ProposifyBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:02 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 21 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:09 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 19 | 189 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:38 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 17 | 78 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:02 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 7 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 11 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:05 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:50 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:59 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:58 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:47 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:09 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 12 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:52 | yes | 14 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga CPQ
HubSpot read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
HubSpot Quoting (part of HubSpot CRM) read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
Oracle read as Oracle CPQ
PROS read as PROS Smart CPQ
SAP read as SAP CPQ
Salesforce read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (SteelBrick) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (now Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (now Salesforce Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ / Revenue Cloud read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ/Revenue Cloud read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Zoho CRM CPQ read as Zoho CPQ
Unresolved, counted raw
3P Learning's solutions
Apparound
Apparound / Expedite Commerce
Balanced
CPQ Cloud / Infor
ConfigureOne
ConvertSite
Corcentric
DeltaQuote
Hive CPQ Online Product Configurator
Pipedrive CPQ and Quoter
Pipedrive Smart Docs
Ploomes CRM CPQ add-on
QuoteWerks Web
QuoteWorks
TurboQuote by TurboDocx
VividWorks
Zoho Quotes (part of Zoho CRM)
djust.io
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.