September 2026 Edition, expanded tier · The six flagship models on every category, as published . The public index runs on the standard tier; this record is what the Expanded Edition Pack delivers on one category. The category page →
Index › GTM › Marketing › Influencer · September 2026 Edition

Influencer platforms

Asked as “influencer marketing platform”, and as “creator and influencer management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B software company. 23 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, six models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Collabstr 17%
39Favikon17Collabstr13Shopify Collabs30others

39% of first choices, contested.

ShowinginAll 112 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all six models, for a mid-market B2B software company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Favikon39%0%13endorsed leadernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 39% now.
02Collabstr17%20%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 17% now.
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08GRIN0%53%17criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
06Traackr0%44%18criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
07Upfluence0%44%16criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
05CreatorIQ0%33%21criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
04Aspire0%21%14accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
03Modash0%10%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 12 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Favikon39%
02Collabstr17%
03Modash0%
04Aspire0%
05CreatorIQ0%
06Traackr0%
07Upfluence0%
08GRIN0%

What they warned about

Three of six models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-6 Astra, Gemini 3.1 Pro and Perplexity Sonar Pro changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
GRIN
53%
9 of 17 labels negative · 6 of 6 models · 5 hard negative
“Grin (If you are a small to mid-sized business): ... heavy criticism ... locked into expensive 12-month auto-renewing contracts” Gemini 3.1 Pro, negative prompt
Upfluence
44%
7 of 16 labels negative · 5 of 6 models · 2 hard negative
“Skip the enterprise tier entirely — GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence, CreatorIQ, Traackr.” Claude Opus 5, budget prompt
CreatorIQ
33%
7 of 21 labels negative · 4 of 6 models · 4 hard negative
“high cost and complexity ... deliberately *avoid* the big-name creator platforms” Claude Opus 5, paraphrase prompt
Traackr
44%
8 of 18 labels negative · 4 of 6 models · 2 hard negative
“Skip the enterprise tier entirely — GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence, CreatorIQ, Traackr.” Claude Opus 5, budget prompt

What they cite

Six of the six models returned a source list in this edition: six return the pages they cited.

Sites the answers cite

33 of 36 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 6 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 555 links across 195 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 36 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

11 answers · 16 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Modash10 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · GRIN10 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Collabstr9 answers · 16 citations · 5 models
8 answers · 16 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Afluencer8 answers · 14 citations · 4 models
8 answers · 14 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Guideflow8 answers · 8 citations · 2 models
8 answers · 8 citations · 3 models
vendor site · Sprout Social8 answers · 8 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Reddit7 answers · 16 citations · 2 models
vendor site · Archive7 answers · 11 citations · 3 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best influencer marketing platform”, “influencer marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Favikon favikon.com39%581,0002239,3071
Collabstr collabstr.com17%288,10071387,539$652802
Shopify Collabs shopify.com13%725,400783,486,997$3,3511103
Afluencer afluencer.com9%401,300423,337
Heepsy heepsy.com4%321,000116,6742
Passionfroot passionfroot.me4%4
Influencity influencity.com4%1672099,30614,112$2175
Naano naano.com4%
PartnerStack partnerstack.com4%4014,4006827,49516
Modash modash.io0%626,6005583,523$47710

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (archive.com, collabstr.com, g2.com, influencermarketinghub.com, reddit.com, sproutsocial.com). The first result for “best influencer marketing platform” is upfluence.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best influencer marketing platform for a mid-market B2B software company?”Paraphrase“Which creator and influencer management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B software company?”Comparative“What are the top influencer marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best influencer marketing platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an influencer marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which influencer marketing platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Opus 5Favikon
Six alternativesDSMN8, EveryoneSocial, GaggleAMP, LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads, Oktopost, Traackr
against: Brandwatch Influence, CreatorIQ, Onalytica
FavikonHeld
Four alternativesKolsquare, LinkedIn Creator Marketplace, Onalytica, Thinkers360
against: Aspire, CreatorIQ, GRIN, Traackr, Upfluence
no first choice
One alternativeCreatorIQ
against: Traackr
Collabstr
Five alternativesAfluencer, Heepsy, JoinBrands, Modash, Shopify Collabs
against: Aspire, CreatorIQ, GRIN, Traackr, Upfluence
no first choicenothing named
Claude Opus 4.8Favikon
Five alternativesEveryoneSocial, GaggleAMP, Limelight, Oktopost, Onalytica
against: GRIN, Sprout Social, Traackr, Upfluence
FavikonHeld
Three alternativesKolsquare, Onalytica, Traackr
against: Aspire, GRIN, Upfluence
CreatorIQ
Seven alternativesAspire, Collabstr, GRIN, Heepsy, Influence.co, Traackr, Upfluence
Afluencer, Collabstr, Shopify Collabs
One alternativeShoutcart
against: Modash
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 AstraFavikon
Two alternativesOnalytica, Passionfroot
PassionfrootChanged
Two alternativesCreatorIQ, Favikon
no first choice
Eight alternativesAspire, Collabstr, CreatorIQ, GRIN, Modash, Sprout Social Influencer Marketing, Traackr, Upfluence
Collabstr, Shopify Collabsno first choiceagainst: Collabstr, GRIN, Insense, Upfluence
GPT-5.6 SolFavikon
Four alternativesOnalytica, Passionfroot, Sprout Social Influencer Marketing, impact.com
FavikonHeld
Five alternativesCreatorIQ, LinkedIn Creator Marketplace, Sprout Social Influencer Marketing, Traackr, impact.com
Aspire, GRIN, Modash, impact.com
Six alternativesCreatorIQ, HypeAuditor, Later Influence, Sprout Social Influencer Marketing, Traackr, Upfluence
against: Shopify Collabs
Heepsy
Two alternativesAinfluencer, Shopify Collabs
no first choiceagainst: Captiv8, CreatorIQ, GRIN, Upfluence
Gemini 3.1 ProFavikon, Naano
One alternativeModash
against: Onalytica, Traackr
PartnerStackChanged
Four alternativesFavikon, Influitive, Upfluence, impact.com
no first choice
Nine alternativesAspire, Collabstr, CreatorIQ, Favikon, GRIN, HypeAuditor, Influee, Modash, Upfluence
Collabstr
Seven alternativesAinfluencer, Heepsy, Influence.co, JoinBrands, KALO IQ, Shopify Collabs, Social Cat
against: CreatorIQ, GRIN, Traackr
no first choiceagainst: Afluencer, CreatorIQ, GRIN, Traackr, Upfluence
Perplexity Sonar ProInfluencity
Two alternativesFavikon, Naano
against: CreatorIQ, Traackr
FavikonChanged
Two alternativesAspire, CreatorIQ
no first choiceAfluencer, Shopify Collabs
Two alternativesHeepsy, Modash
no first choiceagainst: Afluencer, Billo, Collabstr, GRIN, Insense
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Thirty-six rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 16:38yes3661 s
Direct recommendationClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 16:45yes14323 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 18:51yes437 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 18:52yes635 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 16:59yes1037 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 16:45yes206 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 16:48yes3362 s
ParaphraseClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 16:50yes3258 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 18:54yes728 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 18:56yes349 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:00no021 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 16:51yes206 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 16:53yes3053 s
ComparativeClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 17:03yes32527 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 18:58yes1048 s
ComparativeGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:00yes1142 s
ComparativeGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:02yes934 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 17:04yes209 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 17:07yes2538 s
Budget constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 17:13yes36226 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:01yes320 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:02yes317 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:04yes926 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 17:13yes205 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 17:16yes3461 s
Scale constrainedClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 17:17no021 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:04yes639 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:06yes251 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:05no025 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 17:18yes2010 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 5claude-opus-52026-09-09 17:22yes19139 s
Negative framingClaude Opus 4.8claude-opus-4-82026-09-09 17:24yes3851 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra2026-09-09 19:08yes643 s
Negative framingGPT-5.6 Solgpt-5.6-sol2026-09-09 19:09yes535 s
Negative framingGemini 3.1 Progemini-3.1-pro-preview2026-09-10 17:06yes1242 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonar Prosonar-pro2026-09-09 17:24yes205 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Brandwatch read as Brandwatch Influence
Unresolved, counted raw
None awaiting human review.
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← ExperimentationLanding pages →