November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Product analytics · November 2026 Edition

Product analytics

Asked as “product analytics platform”, and as “product analytics tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Amplitude33PostHog22Mixpanel

46% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+12Since October 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Amplitude held the lead, +12 points on 34%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Amplitude46%13%71endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.34% → 46%
02PostHog33%6%71endorsed leader▲+11Since October 2026: 22% → 33%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 33%
03Mixpanel22%16%75accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 24% → 22%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 22%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set0%67%30criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
05Heap0%30%50criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
06Fullstory0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
04Pendo0%14%49accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%
07Contentsquare0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Analytics 4 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Amplitude46%
02PostHog33%
03Mixpanel22%
04Pendo0%
05Heap0%
06Fullstory0%
07Contentsquare0%
08Google Analytics 40%

What they warned about

Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Analytics 4
67%
20 of 30 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Google Analytics (especially GA4) - Privacy concerns, cookie-dependence, data collection practices” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Mixpanel
16%
12 of 75 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Mixpanel has received significant attention following a data breach in November 2025 that exposed profile information for some API users” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Heap
30%
15 of 50 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid: Heap for mid-market (pricing is custom/enterprise-focused)” Kimi K2, direct prompt
Amplitude
13%
9 of 71 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Amplitude receives a high share of negative labels (31% in one analysis)” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 716 links across 192 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Amplitude35 answers · 59 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Mixpanel35 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · LinkedIn30 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PostHog23 answers · 45 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Userpilot21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Gainsight13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)12 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Capterra11 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 16 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Pendo11 answers · 15 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product analytics platform”, “product analytics platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Amplitude amplitude.com46%41874,0005,691373,273$207272
PostHog posthog.com33%42033,10027125,936120
Mixpanel mixpanel.com22%46712,10045820,284$45811
Pendo pendo.io0%40912,10076119,185$3,60993
Contentsquare heap.io
Heap 0%
0%15040,50011,45416,541327
June june.so0%13135,000209,4011,167
Fullstory fullstory.com0%2175,400159141,869$348148
Userpilot userpilot.com0%2471,6001062,08463
Plausible plausible.io0%1460,5001,14339,368
UXCam uxcam.com0%42320413,3598

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (amplitude.com, gainsight.com, userpilot.com). The first result for “best product analytics platform” is domo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best product analytics platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which product analytics tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top product analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product analytics platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a product analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product analytics platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldAmplitude, Mixpanel
Five alternativesHeap, Matomo, Pendo, PostHog, Statsig
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel, Zoho Analytics
against: Google Analytics 4
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, LogRocket, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
GPT-5.4 miniAmplitude
Three alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo
AmplitudeHeld
Five alternativesLooker, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Tableau
against: Heap
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Gemini 3.5 FlashMixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
MixpanelHeld
Three alternativesAmplitude, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, June, Mixpanel
no first choice
Five alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Amplitude, Flurry Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Google Universal Analytics, Heap, Keen.io, Kissmetrics, Mixpanel, Woopra
Perplexity SonarAmplitude
Three alternativesJune, Mixpanel, Pendo
AmplitudeHeld
Four alternativesJune, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Six alternativesFullstory, Heap, LogRocket, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
against: Google Analytics 4
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Heap, LogRocket, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Grok 4.20Amplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Heap
MixpanelChanged
Three alternativesAmplitude, Pendo, PostHog
against: Google Analytics 360, Heap
no first choice
Seven alternativesAmplitude, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog, Smartlook, UXCam
against: Google Analytics 4
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
against: GrowthBook, ROAARRR
Amplitude
Four alternativesLogRocket, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Google Analytics 4
against: Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
Mistral SmallAmplitude, Mixpanel
Three alternativesHeap, June, PostHog
no first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: Google Analytics 4Mixpanel, PostHog
Two alternativesGrowthBook, Hotjar
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Gainsight PX, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog, Relevance AI, Statsig
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
against: Heap
no first choicePostHog
Four alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Hotjar, Lucky Orange
Llama 4 MaverickAmplitude, Mixpanel
Three alternativesHeap, June, PostHog
AmplitudeChanged
Seven alternativesFullstory, Gainsight PX, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Userpilot
no first choicePostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplitude
Four alternativesJune, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Three alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, PostHog
against: Pendo
no first choice
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, UXCam
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Kimi K2Mixpanel
Two alternativesAmplitude, PostHog
against: Heap, Pendo
MixpanelHeld
Three alternativesAmplitude, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude, PostHog
Two alternativesMatomo, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Three alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Amplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Five alternativesCountly, Heap, Hotjar, Mixpanel, TelemetryDeck
against: Google Analytics 4
Amplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Amplitude, Contentsquare, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PowerMyAnalytics
MiniMax M2.5Amplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude, PostHogChanged
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
no first choice
Five alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Four alternativesAmplitude, Hotjar, Mixpanel, Userpilot
no first choiceagainst: Facebook, Google Analytics 4, Microsoft, Mixpanel
GPT-6 LunaMixpanel
Three alternativesAmplitude, Pendo, PostHog
MixpanelHeld
Three alternativesAmplitude, Group Analytics, PostHog
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Three alternativesHeap, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Statsig
no first choiceagainst: Mixpanel
Muse Glimmer 30BAmplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Five alternativesGainsight PX, Heap, Pendo, PostHog, Userpilot
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
against: Google Analytics 4
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:49no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:59yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:07no016 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:04yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:47yes1414 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:08yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:31yes2228 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:55yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:50yes528 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:23yes1533 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:39yes1554 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:40yes527 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:48yes517 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:25yes1519 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:27no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:14no03 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:55no017 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:27yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:47yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:30no01 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:07yes2030 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:50yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:14no035 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:01yes2022 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:14yes1016 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:11yes547 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:39yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:21yes1417 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:58yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:43yes313 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:44no019 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:07yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:49yes516 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:11yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:53yes2227 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:45yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:05yes527 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:12yes1435 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:38yes25130 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:10yes931 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:30yes726 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:57yes1324 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:42yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:12yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:06yes1220 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:23yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:54yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:42yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:29yes1923 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:34yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:48yes513 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:00yes2031 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:16yes1027 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:12yes520 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:13yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:44yes1520 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:36no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:14no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:23no021 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:27yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:17yes816 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:22no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:31yes2553 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:27yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:35yes524 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:37yes822 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:32yes24154 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:53no028 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:47yes318 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:12no01 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:22yes98 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:55yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:55yes514 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:49yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:57yes914 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:31yes57 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:35yes2434 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:50yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:13yes938 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:03yes2429 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:59yes2340 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:39yes1528 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:33yes121 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:48yes1522 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Analytics
Amplitude read as Amplitude
Unresolved, counted raw
Fullview
Group Analytics
Keen.io
Microsoft
PowerMyAnalytics
ROAARRR
Snowflake's Cortex
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Market intelligenceSession replay →