November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Product analytics › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Product analytics for small business buyers

Asked as “product analytics platform”, and as “product analytics tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
62%
Clear leader
62PostHog25Mixpanel05Amplitude07others

62% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+12Since October 2026: 50% → 62%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.PostHog held the lead, +12 points on 50%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PostHog62%1%73endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 50% → 62%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.50% → 62%
02Mixpanel25%19%77accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 34% → 25%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.34% → 25%
03Amplitude5%35%68criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 5%
04Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set4%66%29criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06Pendo0%34%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
07LogRocket0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
05Heap0%30%37criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Analytics 4 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01PostHog62%
02Mixpanel25%
03Amplitude5%
04Google Analytics 44%
05Heap0%
06Pendo0%
07LogRocket0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Amplitude
35%
24 of 68 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid or be cautious about: Amplitude, Mixpanel, GA4 (as your primary product-analytics tool), Adobe Analytics, FullStory, Contentsquare, LogRocket, Crazy Egg, Smartlook” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Google Analytics 4
66%
19 of 29 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“One source explicitly advises avoiding GA4 as the primary tool for product analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Mixpanel
19%
15 of 77 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“AI models flag Mixpanel with a notable negative share (14% of labels negative; 11 of 14 models flagged it as something to avoid)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Adobe Analytics
100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“83% of models recommending against it for small businesses. It's designed for large enterprises and can be overly complex and expensive” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 697 links across 153 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · PostHog45 answers · 72 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Mixpanel37 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Amplitude34 answers · 57 citations · 12 models
31 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · LinkedIn30 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rework27 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Spotsaas22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra20 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Userpilot20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · CleverX9 answers · 9 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product analytics platform”, “product analytics platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
PostHog posthog.com62%42033,10027125,936120
Mixpanel mixpanel.com25%46712,10045820,284$45811
Amplitude amplitude.com5%41874,0005,691373,273$207272
Google analytics.google.com
Google Analytics 4 4%
4%4739,900348
June june.so2%13135,000209,4011,167
GainsightPX gainsight.com2%159,569589
Contentsquare heap.io
Heap 0%
0%15040,50011,45416,541327
Pendo pendo.io0%40912,10076119,185$3,60993
Lucky Orange luckyorange.com0%751,900703,021$237
Matomo matomo.org0%1601,9008735,0159

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (amplitude.com, userpilot.com). The first result for “best product analytics platform” is domo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best product analytics platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which product analytics tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top product analytics platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product analytics platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a product analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product analytics platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GainsightPX
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude, MixpanelChanged
Four alternativesHeap, Intercom, Pendo, Segment
PostHog
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Hotjar, Mixpanel
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Three alternativesHotjar, PostHog, Zoho Analytics
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Looker, Mixpanel
GPT-5.4 miniMixpanel
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, PostHog
PostHogChanged
One alternativeMixpanel
against: HubSpot
Mixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Pendo
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog
Two alternativesJune, Mixpanel
against: Amplitude
JuneChanged
Two alternativesMixpanel, PostHog
PostHog
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, June, Mixpanel
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, June, Mixpanel
Mixpanel, PostHogagainst: Amplitude, Heapagainst: Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Heap, LogRocket, Mixpanel, Pendo, Quantum Metric, Scuba Analytics, Snowplow, raw ClickHouse + Grafana
Perplexity SonarMixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
MixpanelHeld
Two alternativesPendo, PostHog
Mixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
against: Google Analytics 4
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Alteryx, Amplitude, Databricks, Google Analytics 4, Heap, LogRocket, Looker, Mixpanel, Pendo, Splunk, Tableau
Grok 4.20PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Lucky Orange, Mixpanel
against: Pendo
MixpanelChanged
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Lucky Orange, Pendo
against: Google Analytics 4
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
against: Contentsquare, Pendo
PostHog
Three alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, Matomo, Mixpanel
against: Amplitude, Contentsquare, Pendo
PostHog
Three alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4
against: Amplitude, Gainsight, Heap, Mixpanel, Peel Analytics, Pendo
Mistral SmallPostHog
Three alternativesLucky Orange, Mixpanel, Userpilot
no first choiceChangedMixpanel, PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Lucky Orange, Userpilot
against: Contentsquare, Pendo
Google Analytics 4
Four alternativesHotjar, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
DeepSeek V4 FlashPostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
against: Heap
PostHogHeld
One alternativeMixpanel
against: Amplitude, Heap
Mixpanel, PostHog
One alternativeHeap
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Pendo
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
against: Hotjar
Mixpanel, PostHog
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
Llama 4 Maverickno first choicePostHogChanged
Four alternativesAmplitude, Lucky Orange, Mixpanel, Usermaven
PostHog
Nine alternatives5-Out, Amplitude, LogRocket, Matomo, Mixpanel, Quantum Metric, Simple Analytics AI, TrendFeedr, Veritone Discovery
Google Analytics 4
Three alternativesLogRocket, Mixpanel, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Qwen 3.7 FlashPostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
MixpanelChanged
Two alternativesAmplitude, PostHog
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
Amplitude
Four alternativesMicrosoft Clarity, Mixpanel, PostHog, Usermaven
PostHog
Five alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, WalkMe
against: Google Analytics 4
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Kimi K2Mixpanel, PostHog
Two alternativesLogRocket, Pendo
against: Amplitude
PostHogChanged
One alternativeMixpanel
against: Amplitude
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Countly, Microsoft Clarity
against: Mixpanel
Mixpanel, PostHog
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
GLM 4.7 FlashXPostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
against: Lucky Orange
PostHogHeld
One alternativeHeap
Mixpanel, PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, LogRocket, Pendo
against: Google Analytics 4
PostHog
One alternativeMixpanel
against: Heap
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Contentsquare, Crazy Egg, Databricks, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, LogRocket, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Smartlook, Tableau
MiniMax M2.5Mixpanel, PostHog
One alternativeAmplitude
MixpanelChanged
Two alternativesAmplitude, PostHog
PostHog
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo
against: Google Analytics 4
PostHog
Two alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, Mixpanel
PostHogagainst: Amplitude, Mixpanelagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Mixpanel, Tableau
GPT-6 LunaPostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
PostHogHeldMixpanel
Four alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BMixpanel, PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Pendo, Userpilot
PostHogChanged
Two alternativesMixpanel, Usermaven
against: Amplitude
PostHog
Three alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
PostHog
One alternativeGoogle Analytics 4
PostHog
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
against: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:41yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:26yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:09yes1323 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:35yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:03yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:05yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:10yes1823 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:54yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:14no031 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:33yes1017 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:45yes1928 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:56yes518 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:05yes310 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:22yes1323 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:35no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:44no02 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:50no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:39yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:02yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:54no01 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:47yes2331 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:45yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:32no029 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:23yes1015 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:40yes2529 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:21no015 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:39yes212 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:28yes1517 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:51yes109 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:06yes45 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:10no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:22yes104 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:21yes514 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:01yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:10yes1830 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:56yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:48yes527 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:52yes1046 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:30yes927 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:10yes1032 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:17yes518 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:42yes1528 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:10yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:46yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:15yes1622 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:11yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:18yes510 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:58yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:39yes1014 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:38yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:21yes533 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:53yes1530 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:03yes2429 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:56yes517 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:34yes38 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:06yes1419 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:50no08 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:37no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:48no014 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:45yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:47yes517 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:55no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:53yes1644 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:38yes65 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:56no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:44yes721 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:58yes1469 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:33yes943 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:10yes220 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:31yes1327 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:35yes188 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:22yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:52no013 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:36yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:58yes1013 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:59yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:45yes2556 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:08yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:46yes523 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:42yes2053 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:48yes17151 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:00yes1549 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:09yes512 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:37yes2326 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amplitude read as Amplitude
Unresolved, counted raw
5-Out
Palzin Track
Peel Analytics
Scuba Analytics
Simple Analytics AI
raw ClickHouse + Grafana
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Market intelligenceSession replay →