Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › BI & dashboards › Small business · November 2026 Edition
Dashboards and data visualization for small business buyers
Asked as “business intelligence and dashboard tool”, and as “data visualization platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Microsoft Power BI22Looker Studio19Metabase14others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Power BI held the lead, +9 points on 37%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Power BI46%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Power BI65%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI61%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 58% → 61%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Microsoft Power BI46%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Power BI65%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI61%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 58% → 61%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Power BI46%8%74endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.37% → 46%
Microsoft Power BI46%8%74endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.37% → 46%02
Looker Studio Lab in the set22%3%70accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 35% → 22%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.35% → 22%
Looker Studio Lab in the set22%3%70accepted challenger▼−13Since October 2026: 35% → 22%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.35% → 22%03
Metabase19%2%55accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%
Metabase19%2%55accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 9% → 19%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 19%04
Zoho Analytics12%2%49accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 12%
Zoho Analytics12%2%49accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 12%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08
Looker Lab in the set0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%59%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Domo0%57%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Domo0%57%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Tableau0%51%55criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tableau0%51%55criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Qlik Sense0%48%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qlik Sense0%48%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
Databox0%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Databox0%0%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models twelve times of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Microsoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs Qlik SenseMicrosoft Power BI vs DomoLooker Studio vs TableauLooker Studio vs MetabaseLooker Studio vs Zoho AnalyticsLooker Studio vs Qlik SenseLooker Studio vs DomoTableau vs MetabaseTableau vs Zoho AnalyticsTableau vs Qlik SenseTableau vs DomoMetabase vs Zoho AnalyticsMetabase vs Qlik SenseMetabase vs DomoZoho Analytics vs Qlik SenseZoho Analytics vs DomoQlik Sense vs Domo
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Power BI46%
Microsoft Power BI46%02Looker Studio22%
Looker Studio22%03Metabase19%
Metabase19%04Zoho Analytics12%
Zoho Analytics12%05Databox0%
Databox0%06Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%07Domo0%
Domo0%08Looker0%
Looker0%09Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tableau51%
28 of 55 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise-grade BI tools like Tableau, Looker (Google), Qlik, and Sisense are often ones small businesses ... should avoid or approach with caution” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Looker59%
10 of 17 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Buying Enterprise Tableau or Enterprise Looker too early: ... these tools are often too rigid and costly for a 30-person company.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Microsoft Power BI8%
6 of 74 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Power BI is overkill for 95% of small e-commerce stores (under $2M revenue).” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Qlik Sense48%
11 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“pricing and setup complexity make it unsuitable for most small ops without dedicated resources” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
68 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 702 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Basedash33 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Software Advice27 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ajelix26 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier24 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Coefficient21 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Metabase12 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · GetApp11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
10 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool”, “business intelligence and dashboard tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power BI 46% | 46% | 240 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||
| Google cloud.google.com Looker Studio 22% | 22% | 108 | 40,500 | 452 | 7,405,347 | |
| Metabase metabase.com | 19% | 116 | 14,800 | 337 | 60,151 | 1 |
| Zoho parent site Zoho Analytics 12% | 12% | 88 | 2,900 | 23 | ||
| Cube cubeapm.com | 2% | 17 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 846 | |
| Databox databox.com | 0% | 35 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 |
| Klipfolio klipfolio.com | 0% | 10 | 1,600 | 23 | 114,418 | 0 |
| Geckoboard | 0% | 880 | 15 | |||
| Ajelix ajelix.com | 0% | 4 | ||||
| Preset preset.io | 0% | 5 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (zapier.com). The first result for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data visualization platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top business intelligence tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a business intelligence and dashboard tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business intelligence tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Looker Studio, MetabaseLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsLooker Studio, Zoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Sisense for Cloud Data Teams, Tableau, Trevor
Two alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, TableauThree alternatives
Apache Superset, Metabase, Qlik SenseTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseTwo alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BIGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Looker StudioMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BIMetabaseagainst: Tableauno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Metabase, TableauTwo alternatives
Qlik Sense, TableauFour alternatives
Looker, Metabase, Qlik Sense, TableauTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIGemini 3.5 FlashMetabaseMicrosoft Power BIChangedLooker StudioLooker StudioMetabaseagainst: Looker, Tableauagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Platform, MicroStrategy, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau, raw Apache Superset, self-hosted Metabase
Five alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Databox, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Preset, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Grafana, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, PresetSeven alternatives
Equals, Hex, Lightdash, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Omni, SigmaPerplexity SonarZoho Analyticsagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Looker, Qlik Sense, TableauZoho Analyticsagainst: Tableauno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, IBM Cognos, Looker, Qlik Sense, SAS Viya, Tableau
Four alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BITwo alternatives
Looker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIGrok 4.20Microsoft Power BIagainst: Domo, Qlik SenseMicrosoft Power BIHeldLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Domo, Looker, SAS ViyaMicrosoft Power BIagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Domo, Qlik Senseagainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Sisense, Tableau
Three alternatives
Metabase, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Qlik Sense, TableauFour alternatives
Metabase, Qlik Sense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsMistral SmallMicrosoft Power BIno first choiceChangedno first choiceLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Board, Looker, Sisense
Three alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, MetabaseSeven alternatives
Ajelix, Klipfolio, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Datapad, Power BI Desktop, Zoho AnalyticsDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldLooker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Domo, Qlik Sense, TableauMicrosoft Power BILooker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Qlik Sense, Tableauagainst: IBM Cognos, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle BI, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, Sisense, Tableau
Four alternatives
Databox, HubSpot, Looker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Zoho AnalyticsLlama 4 MaverickZoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: Tableauno first choiceZoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Crystal Reports, IBM, Oracle Analytics, SAP
Three alternatives
FineBI, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BITwo alternatives
Adobe Customer Journey Analytics, LookerFour alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIQwen 3.7 FlashLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedLooker StudioLooker StudioCube, Metabaseagainst: Looker, Microsoft PowerBI, Qlik Sense, Sigma, Tableauagainst: IBM Cognos, Looker, Mode Analytics, Python/R, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, MetabaseTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, TableauFour alternatives
Databox, Klipfolio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Looker StudioKimi K2Metabase, Microsoft Power BIagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: DomoLooker Studio, Metabaseagainst: Power BI DesktopLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos, SAS, Tableauagainst: Grow.com, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
Looker StudioFive alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, Metabase, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
DataHub, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Power BI, Zoho Analyticsagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIagainst: HexLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Oracle Analytics, SAS Viya, Sisense
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseFour alternatives
Canva, Looker, Tableau, Zebra BISix alternatives
DataHub, Databox, Geckoboard, Klipfolio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BILooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos, Microsoft Excel, Oracle BI, SAP BusinessObjects
Four alternatives
Domo, Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Metabase, Sisense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Apache Superset, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsGPT-6 LunaMetabaseMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: TableauMetabaseno first choiceagainst: Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Looker StudioThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIFour alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, TableauMuse Glimmer 30BZoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauZoho Analyticsagainst: TableauLooker Studio, Metabaseno first choiceagainst: IBM, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP, Zoho Analytics
Three alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
Looker StudioThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Power BI Desktop, Zoho AnalyticsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:31 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 17 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:55 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:43 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 18 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:29 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:16 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 14 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 19 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:41 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:15 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:37 | yes | 24 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:42 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:27 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:10 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:42 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 14 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 4 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:40 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:38 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 14 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 25 | 208 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Oracle read as Oracle Analytics
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Qlik Sense / QlikView) read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Sense or Cloud Analytics) read as Qlik Sense
Zoho read as Zoho Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Excel Power Query/PivotTables
Google Sheets with add-ons
Grow.com
Looker Platform (Google Cloud)
Metabase Cloud
Python/R
SAP
Sisense for Cloud Data Teams
Zebra BI (Power BI Add‑In)
raw Apache Superset
self-hosted Metabase
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.