Dashboards and data visualization
Asked as “business intelligence and dashboard tool”, and as “data visualization platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
65%
Clear leader
65Microsoft Power BI16Looker Studio04Metabase14others
65% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Microsoft Power BI held the lead, +13 points on 52%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Power BI46%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power BI65%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI61%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 58% → 61%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Microsoft Power BI46%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 37% → 46%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power BI65%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI61%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 58% → 61%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Power BI65%9%76endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.52% → 65%
Microsoft Power BI65%9%76endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 52% → 65%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.52% → 65%02
Looker Studio Lab in the set16%7%28accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 25% → 16%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 16%
Looker Studio Lab in the set16%7%28accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 25% → 16%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 16%03
Tableau4%16%61accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Tableau4%16%61accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%04
Metabase4%7%45accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Metabase4%7%45accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%05
Zoho Analytics4%5%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Zoho Analytics4%5%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06
Qlik Sense2%24%38accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Qlik Sense2%24%38accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Domo2%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Domo2%18%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Sisense0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Sisense0%20%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Looker Lab in the set0%14%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%14%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Sigma0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Sigma0%6%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
ThoughtSpot0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ThoughtSpot0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Databox0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Databox0%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Apache Superset0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Apache Superset0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models seven times of 52. Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Microsoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs Qlik SenseMicrosoft Power BI vs DomoLooker Studio vs TableauLooker Studio vs MetabaseLooker Studio vs Zoho AnalyticsLooker Studio vs Qlik SenseLooker Studio vs DomoTableau vs MetabaseTableau vs Zoho AnalyticsTableau vs Qlik SenseTableau vs DomoMetabase vs Zoho AnalyticsMetabase vs Qlik SenseMetabase vs DomoZoho Analytics vs Qlik SenseZoho Analytics vs DomoQlik Sense vs Domo
One product takes 65% of first choices here, so the chart would put twelve markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Zero products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eleven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Qlik Sense24%
9 of 38 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Proprietary tools with limited data export options (e.g., some Qlik or Tableau deployments) can make migration difficult later.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Tableau16%
10 of 61 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Tableau documents cases where some composed data-source extracts can't be done on the web and require Desktop, which can be a maintenance or governance burden.” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
SAP BusinessObjects
78%
7 of 9 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for new projects: ... Crystal Reports/SAP BusinessObjects (in their legacy form)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Power BI9%
7 of 76 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Extremely popular and cost-effective, but watch for specialist needs (like building complex models), reconciliation errors, and AI that doesn't always meet hype.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 685 links across 254 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 6 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Microsoft15 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zoho14 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Basedash14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Databox12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Qlik10 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
vendor site · ThoughtSpot9 answers · 11 citations · 5 models
vendor site · LinkedIn9 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
16 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 6 models
8 answers · 4 models
7 answers · 7 models
7 answers · 7 models
6 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool”, “business intelligence and dashboard tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power BI 65% | 65% | 240 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Google cloud.google.com Looker Studio 16%, Looker 0% | 16% | 129 | 40,500 | 452 | 7,405,347 | |||
| Tableau tableau.com | 4% | 200 | 135,000 | 15,635 | 1,201,809 | $23 | 85 | 3 |
| Metabase metabase.com | 4% | 116 | 14,800 | 337 | 60,151 | 1 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho Analytics 4% | 4% | 88 | 2,900 | 23 | ||||
| Qlik Sense qlik.com | 2% | 88 | 3,600 | 379 | 705,831 | 55 | 1 | |
| Domo domo.com | 2% | 70 | 135,000 | 4,397 | 255,482 | 87 | 5 | |
| Power BI Desktop | 2% | |||||||
| Databox databox.com | 0% | 35 | 3,600 | 68 | 60,861 | 4 | ||
| ThoughtSpot thoughtspot.com | 0% | 50 | 8,100 | 269 | 207,491 | $2,050 | 75 | 9 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (qlik.com, thoughtspot.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best business intelligence and dashboard tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which data visualization platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top business intelligence tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business intelligence and dashboard tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a business intelligence and dashboard tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business intelligence tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Tableauno first choiceChangedno first choiceLooker Studio, Zoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Four alternatives
Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, SisenseTwo alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BIGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BIMetabaseno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Tableau
Two alternatives
Looker, TableauTwo alternatives
Looker, TableauFive alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Sigma, Tableau, ThoughtSpotTwo alternatives
Apache Superset, Microsoft Power BIGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Salesforce/TableauMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BILooker Studiono first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Legacy QlikView, Looker, Microsoft Fabric, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle BI Enterprise Edition (OBIEE) / Oracle Analytics Server, SAP BusinessObjects, SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) & Crystal Reports, Tableau
Three alternatives
Looker, Metabase, SigmaThree alternatives
Looker, Metabase, TableauFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotThree alternatives
Apache Superset, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BI, TableauLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Domo, Metabase, Qlik Sense, Sisense, Superset, Zoho Analytics
Four alternatives
Looker, Metabase, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsFive alternatives
Looker, Metabase, Qlik Sense, Sisense, TableauEight alternatives
Domo, Looker, Metabase, Qlik Sense, Sigma, Sisense, ThoughtSpot, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Databox, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsGrok 4.20Microsoft Power BIagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIHeldagainst: Looker StudioMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Looker Studio, Oracle Analytics, SAPagainst: Domo, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Business Intelligence, Power My Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau
Three alternatives
Domo, Looker, Qlik SenseThree alternatives
Domo, Looker, TableauSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAS Viya, Sisense, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
Grafana, Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsFive alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Sigma, Tableau, ThoughtSpotMistral SmallMicrosoft Power BIno first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: MicroStrategy, SAP Business Intelligence, SAS Business IntelligenceLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Domo, MicroStrategy, Mode Analyticsagainst: Crystal Reports, IBM Cognos, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, Spreadsheets, Talend
Two alternatives
Databox, TableauThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsSix alternatives
Apache Superset, Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Sigma, TableauDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BILooker Studio, Microsoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Crystal Reports, Looker, MicroStrategy, Phocas, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Metabase, TableauSix alternatives
Domo, Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Sisense, TableauFive alternatives
Looker, Metabase, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotTwo alternatives
Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Looker, Sigma, TableauLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldno first choiceZoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Crystal Reports, SAP
One alternative
DataboxThree alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, MetabaseFive alternatives
Databox, Geckoboard, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldno first choiceMetabaseno first choiceagainst: Chartio, Endeca, Live Office, Microsoft Power BI, Prism, Qlik Sense, QlikView, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Two alternatives
Databox, TableauThree alternatives
Looker, Sigma, TableauThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsKimi K2Microsoft Power BIagainst: Looker, MetabaseMicrosoft Power BIHeldagainst: Domo, SisenseMicrosoft Power BI, Tableauagainst: MetabaseLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos, Legacy SAP BusinessObjects, Looker, MicroStrategy, Older IBM Cognos versions, Oracle BI, Prism, Qlik Sense, SAP BI/BusinessObjects, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Domo, TableauThree alternatives
Looker, Metabase, TableauFour alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjectsThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldMicrosoft Power BILooker StudioMicrosoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableauagainst: Crystal Reports, IBM Cognos, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, Sisense, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Looker Studio, TableauThree alternatives
Domo, Looker, TableauFour alternatives
Domo, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpotSeven alternatives
Apache Superset, Databox, Draxlr, Lightdash, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsThree alternatives
Domo, Sisense, ThoughtSpotMiniMax M2.5Domo, Microsoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIPower BI Desktopagainst: Tableau Creatorno first choiceagainst: BIRT, IBM Cognos, JasperReports, MicroStrategy, Microsoft BI, Oracle BI, Qlik Sense, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Three alternatives
Databox, Looker, TableauThree alternatives
Domo, Looker, TableauFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, QlikView, TableauFour alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldno first choiceMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Microsoft Power BI, TIBCO Cloud Spotfire, Tableau Server
Two alternatives
Looker, SigmaThree alternatives
Looker, Metabase, TableauSeven alternatives
Amazon QuickSight, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau, ThoughtSpot, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Looker Studio, MetabaseThree alternatives
Looker, Sigma, TableauMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIHeldno first choiceLooker Studiono first choiceagainst: Alibaba Cloud Quick BI, Amazon QuickSight, Looker, Qlik Sense, Sigma
Three alternatives
Databox, Looker, TableauThree alternatives
Databox, Looker, TableauSix alternatives
Apache Superset, Databox, Geckoboard, Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:59 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:30 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:38 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:50 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:49 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:04 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:44 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:01 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:15 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 14 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 5 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:29 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:36 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:20 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 122 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:13 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 25 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:13 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Fabric read as Microsoft Fabric
Google read as Looker Studio
Oracle read as Oracle Analytics
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Qlik Sense) read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Sense or Cloud) read as Qlik Sense
Qlik Cloud read as Qlik Sense
Unresolved, counted raw
BIRT
BMC Helix Dashboards
Chartio
Endeca
Grafana Cloud
JasperReports
Legacy QlikView
Legacy SAP BusinessObjects
Live Office
Microsoft BI
Older IBM Cognos versions
Oracle BI Enterprise Edition (OBIEE) / Oracle Analytics Server (On-Prem)
Oracle Business Intelligence (OBIEE/Oracle Analytics Cloud)
Phocas
SAP
SAP BI/BusinessObjects
SAP Business Intelligence
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) & Crystal Reports
TIBCO Cloud Spotfire
Yellowfin BI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.