November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Session replay · November 2026 Edition

Session replay and heatmaps

Asked as “session replay and heatmap tool”, and as “website visitor behavior analytics tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45Microsoft Clarity16Hotjar12Dealfront27others

45% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+12Since October 2026: 33% → 45%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Microsoft Clarity held the lead, +12 points on 33%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Clarity45%20%71endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 33% → 45%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.33% → 45%
02Hotjar16%25%68criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 16% → 16%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 16%
03Dealfront12%0%10accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 12%
04Fullstory10%31%52criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 10%
05PostHog6%0%37accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 7% → 6%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 6%
06Mouseflow4%19%31accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
07LogRocket2%11%37accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
08Contentsquare2%23%30accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
09UXCam2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16Quantum Metric0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Smartlook0%33%15criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12Crazy Egg0%29%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Amplitude Session Replay0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Glassbox0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11OpenReplay0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Lucky Orange0%5%19accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
A14
15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Clarity45%
02Hotjar16%
03Dealfront12%
04Fullstory10%
05PostHog6%
06Mouseflow4%
07LogRocket2%
08Contentsquare2%
09UXCam2%
10Lucky Orange0%
11OpenReplay0%
12Crazy Egg0%
13Glassbox0%
14Amplitude Session Replay0%
15Smartlook0%
16Quantum Metric0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Hotjar
25%
17 of 68 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Very common but often criticized for broad data capture... Many privacy-focused users block it outright.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Fullstory
31%
16 of 52 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Captures extensive session data (including potential PII). Noted in older FTC/exfiltration discussions; demands strict default masking and governance.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Clarity
20%
14 of 71 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Microsoft Clarity began requiring explicit consent for users from the EEA, UK, and Switzerland on October 31, 2025... does not natively respond to the GPC (Global Privacy Control) browser signal” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Mouseflow
19%
6 of 31 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“groups Mouseflow, LogRocket and Smartlook together with Hotjar/Clarity/FullStory as tools that record detailed interactions and raise wiretap liability concerns” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 834 links across 238 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Zapier33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Amplitude28 answers · 34 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Quantum Metric24 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Userpilot24 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LogRocket18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Contentsquare17 answers · 21 citations · 12 models
vendor site · PostHog16 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · UXCam15 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mouseflow12 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best session replay and heatmap tool”, “session replay and heatmap tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Microsoft clarity.microsoft.com
Microsoft Clarity 45%
45%2192,240,000403,13644,297
Hotjar contentsquare.com
Hotjar 16%, Contentsquare 2%
18%2879,900226149,92586
Dealfront leadfeeder.com12%170590918,4473
Fullstory fullstory.com10%2175,400159141,869$34814
PostHog posthog.com6%42033,10027125,936120
Mouseflow mouseflow.com4%791,300187,20227
LogRocket logrocket.com2%1203,60083252,22211
UXCam uxcam.com2%42320413,3598
Lucky Orange luckyorange.com0%751,900703,021$237
OpenReplay openreplay.com0%375905185,076

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (learn.g2.com, quantummetric.com). The first result for “best session replay and heatmap tool” is learn.g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website visitor behavior analytics tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top session replay and heatmap tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a session replay and heatmap tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which session replay and heatmap tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow
Two alternativesFullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft ClarityChanged
Three alternativesDealfront, Google Analytics 4, Salespanel
Crazy Egg, Hotjar
Three alternativesLogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Microsoft Clarity
Two alternativesHotjar, Mouseflow
no first choiceagainst: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, SessionCam
GPT-5.4 miniFullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Microsoft ClarityChanged
Two alternativesCrazy Egg, Fullstory
Contentsquare
Six alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Microsoft Clarity
One alternativePostHog
against: Hotjar
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog
Four alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
against: Contentsquare
PostHogHeld
Five alternativesDealfront, Factors.ai, Heap, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
against: Contentsquare, Quantum Metric
no first choice
Five alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Microsoft Clarity
Two alternativesOpenReplay, PostHog
against: Hotjar, Smartlook
no first choice
Six alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, LogRocket, PostHog, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
against: Clicktale, Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, SessionCam, UserReplay, Yandex Metrica, rrweb
Perplexity SonarHotjar
Three alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory
DealfrontChanged
Two alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity
against: 6sense
no first choice
Ten alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, PostHog, Quantum Metric, UXCam
Microsoft Clarity
Two alternativesHotjar, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar
Two alternativesMicrosoft Clarity, Mouseflow
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory
Microsoft ClarityChanged
One alternativeHotjar
against: Crazy Egg, Fullstory
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Five alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, UXCam
against: Contentsquare, Matomo, OpenReplay, Quantum Metric
Microsoft Clarity
Four alternativesHotjar, Mouseflow, PostHog, Smartlook
Hotjar
Five alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
against: Glassbox, Quantum Metric
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Clicktale, Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, Mixpanel, Mouseflow, SessionCam, Smartlook, UserReplay, Yandex Metrica
Mistral SmallHotjar
Four alternativesFullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
DealfrontChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Mixpanel
Hotjar
Six alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, OpenReplay
Microsoft Clarity
Two alternativesHotjar, Lucky Orange
Fullstory
Two alternativesContentsquare, Hotjar
against: Microsoft Clarity
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar
Five alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
HotjarHeld
Two alternativesDealfront, Microsoft Clarity
against: Adobe, Amplitude Session Replay, Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Mixpanel
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Eight alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, Mouseflow, PostHog, Smartlook, Zoho PageSense
Microsoft Clarity
Two alternativesCrazy Egg, Hotjar
Fullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, Sentry
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric
against: Fullstory, VWO Insights, heatmap.com
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow
Four alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
UXCamChanged
Four alternativesClics, Dealfront, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
no first choiceMicrosoft Clarity
Three alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket
Three alternativesHotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Dealfront, Microsoft ClarityChanged
Three alternativesHotjar, HubSpot, RB2B
against: 6sense, Demandbase
Hotjar
Four alternativesFullstory, LogRocket, Mouseflow, VWO
against: Crazy Egg
Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, OpenReplay, Smartlook
no first choiceagainst: Adobe, Mixpanelagainst: Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Kimi K2PostHog
Two alternativesLogRocket, Mouseflow
against: Microsoft Clarity
Dealfront, Microsoft ClarityChanged
Six alternativesCrazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Matomo, Mixpanel, Plausible
Hotjar
Five alternativesFullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, UXCam
Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesHotjar, Lucky Orange, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarityagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, Microsoft Clarity, SessionCam, Smartlook, UserReplay, Yandex Metrica
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
DealfrontChanged
Six alternatives6sense, Demandbase, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity
no first choice
Eleven alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, PostHog, Smartlook, UXCam, Zoho PageSense
Microsoft Clarity
Four alternativesOpenReplay, PostHog, Rybbit, Temps
against: Hotjar
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
DealfrontChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Analytics 4, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft Clarity
Six alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, PostHog, UXCam
Microsoft Clarity
One alternativeHotjar
Hotjar
Three alternativesLogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Smartlook
against: Fullstory
against: Clicktale, Fullstory, Hotjar, SessionCam, Smartlook, UserReplay, Yandex Metrica
GPT-6 LunaFullstory
Two alternativesContentsquare, PostHog
ContentsquareChanged
Three alternativesHotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Microsoft Clarity
Seven alternativesContentsquare, Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Mouseflow, PostHog
Microsoft Clarity
One alternativePostHog
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude Session Replay, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog Session Replay
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Microsoft ClarityChanged
Two alternativesCrazy Egg, Mouseflow
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar
no first choiceMicrosoft Clarity
Three alternativesHotjar, Mouseflow, PostHog
no first choice
Seven alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, OpenReplay, Sentry
against: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:48yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:57yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:00no019 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:07yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:50yes1013 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:34yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:29yes2226 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:20yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:31yes545 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:57yes1443 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:25yes2533 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:22yes1030 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:12yes311 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:24yes1419 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:35yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:46yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:51no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:57yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:56yes1010 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:04yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:00yes2448 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:32yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:17yes541 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:02yes2526 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:07yes19122 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:03yes922 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:11yes415 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:50yes1523 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:16yes2011 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:30yes57 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:05yes723 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:02yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:28yes817 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:24yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:38yes2326 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:00yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:32no033 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:09yes1035 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:23yes2237 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:33yes2557 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:03yes817 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:11yes1418 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:05yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:59yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:09no013 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:19yes102 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:32yes59 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:21yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:51yes1419 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:52yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:17yes523 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:29yes1028 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:51yes2397 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:28yes524 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:54yes37 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:27yes1114 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:38no08 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:45no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:29no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:53yes109 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:06yes1315 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:19no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:34yes2351 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:16yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:12no034 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:09yes1447 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:05yes1252 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:26no043 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:59yes320 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:11yes1225 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:57yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:47yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:34yes1018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:12yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:59yes1012 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:23yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:22yes2532 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:29yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:59yes1031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:38yes2538 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:14yes23137 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:31yes1860 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:51yes517 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:27yes2433 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amplitude read as Amplitude Session Replay
Datadog read as Datadog Session Replay
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe
Highlight.io
LogRocket Galileo
MS Clarity
Optise
PostHog Session Replay
rrweb
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Product analyticsTag management →