November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Enrichment · November 2026 Edition

Data enrichment

Asked as “B2B data enrichment tool”, and as “lead and account enrichment service”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63Apollo.io27Clay02HubSpot Breeze Intelligence08others

63% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−10Since October 2026: 73% → 63%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Apollo.io held the lead, −10 points on 73%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Apollo.io63%17%75endorsed leader▼−10Since October 2026: 73% → 63%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.73% → 63%
02Clay27%20%56accepted challenger▲+21Since October 2026: 6% → 27%, +21 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.6% → 27%
03HubSpot Breeze Intelligence2%10%48accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
04ZoomInfo2%42%57criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Seamless.AI0%45%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
06Lusha0%21%39accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08People Data Labs0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
05Cognism0%13%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
07Hunter0%5%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01Apollo.io63%
02Clay27%
03HubSpot Breeze Intelligence2%
04ZoomInfo2%
05Cognism0%
06Lusha0%
07Hunter0%
08People Data Labs0%
09Seamless.AI0%

What they warned about

Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Apollo.io
17%
13 of 75 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Widespread reports of inaccurate/outdated contact data ... BBB complaints about unauthorized distribution of personal phone numbers” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ZoomInfo
42%
24 of 57 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“High volume of BBB complaints ... Multiple lawsuits ... Reviews criticize inaccurate data, poor usability, long contracts, high costs” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Clay
20%
11 of 56 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid ZoomInfo ($15K+/year), Clay ($167–185+/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Cognism
13%
7 of 53 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools like ZoomInfo ($15K+/yr), Cognism (quote-based, high for non-EU focus)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 736 links across 205 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 31 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Coffee26 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Demandbase17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lemlist16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Prospeo14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Salespanel14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Apollo.io13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Miniloop13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Snov.io13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PredictLeads12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “b2b data enrichment tool”, “best b2b data enrichment tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Apollo.io apollo.io63%101033,100396111,60894
Clay clay.com27%287135,000168,089294,05611
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Breeze Intelligence 2%
2%202368,0009,776
Snov.io snov.io2%563,6007146,5283
ZoomInfo zoominfo.com2%542135,0001,8106,376,738$1,140120
Leadspace leadspace.com2%392105633
Reverse Contact reversecontact.com2%2
Cognism cognism.com0%3493,6006848,68515
Lusha lusha.com0%28012,10089352,570$1157
Hunter hunter.io0%79201,000280,275152,7826

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (coffee.ai, demandbase.com, miniloop.ai). The first result for “b2b data enrichment tool” is zapier.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best B2B data enrichment tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which lead and account enrichment service would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top B2B data enrichment tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best B2B data enrichment tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a B2B data enrichment tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which B2B data enrichment tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Apollo.io
Two alternativesCognism, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioHeld
Four alternativesHubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Hunter, RocketReach, ZoomInfo
Cleanlist
Four alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
against: Clay
Apollo.io
Five alternativesAdapt, FullEnrich, Hunter, Lusha, Snov.io
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, FullContact
GPT-5.4 miniApollo.io
Five alternativesCognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, HubSpot-native enrichment, People Data Labs, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioHeld
Four alternativesCognism, Dun & Bradstreet, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo
Three alternativesApollo.io, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha
Apollo.io
Two alternativesHunter, Lusha
against: Cognism, ZoomInfo
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, D&B Hoovers, Seamless.AI
Gemini 3.5 FlashClay
Three alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioChanged
Three alternativesClay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
Clay, ZoomInfo
Five alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, UpLead
Apollo.io
Five alternativesClay, Hunter, Lusha, Snov.io, UpLead
no first choiceagainst: Data Axle, Dun & Bradstreet, Fiverr, Kaspr, Lusha, RocketReach, Upwork, ZoomInfo
Perplexity SonarClay
Three alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
ClayHeld
Four alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, FullEnrich, ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo
Eight alternatives6sense, Apollo.io, Clay, Cognism, Demandbase, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Hunter, People Data Labs
against: FullEnrich
Apollo.io
Three alternativesHunter, Lusha, Snov.io
against: Clay
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, BetterContact, Clay, Findymail, FullEnrich, Lusha, People Data Labs, Seamless.AI, ZoomInfo
Grok 4.20Clay
Two alternativesApollo.io, Cognism
against: ZoomInfo
ClayHeld
Three alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
Apollo.io, Cognism, ZoomInfo
Five alternativesClay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, People Data Labs, SalesIntel
Apollo.io, Snov.io
Two alternativesFindymail, Lusha
against: Clay, Cognism, ZoomInfo
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, Artisan, Hunter, Kaspr, Lusha, ZoomInfo
Mistral SmallApollo.io, Clay
Two alternativesCognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Apollo.io, ClayHeld
Three alternativesCognism, Kaspr, Lusha
against: ZoomInfo
no first choiceHubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Reverse Contact
Three alternativesClay, Datanyze, Pipecorn
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, Clay, Cognism, ZoomInfo
DeepSeek V4 FlashApollo.io, Clay
Three alternativesCognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioChanged
Three alternativesClay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo
Nine alternatives6sense, Apollo.io, Clay, Cognism, Demandbase, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Leadspace, Lusha, People Data Labs
Apollo.io
Two alternativesHubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha
against: Clay, Cognism, ZoomInfo
no first choice
One alternativeCUFinder
against: Apollo.io, Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, ZoomInfo
against: AeroLeads / GetProspect, Apollo.io, Clay, Datagma, Lusha, RocketReach, Seamless.AI, ZoomInfo
Llama 4 MaverickClay
Four alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioChanged
Three alternativesClay, FullFunnel, Leadspace
against: Cognism
no first choiceApollo.io
Two alternativesClay, Lusha
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, ZoomInfo
Qwen 3.7 FlashApollo.io
Five alternativesClay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Kaspr, Lusha
Apollo.ioHeld
Three alternativesCognism, Lusha, ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo
Four alternativesApollo.io, Clay, Cognism, People Data Labs
Apollo.io, Clay
Two alternativesLusha, Snov.io
no first choice
Three alternativesApollo.io, Clay, Cognism
against: ZoomInfo
against: Apollo.io, Cognism, Lusha, ZoomInfo
Kimi K2Apollo.io
Three alternativesClay, Cognism, UpLead
against: HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioHeld
Two alternativesClay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
Apollo.io, ZoomInfo
Six alternativesClay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, People Data Labs, PredictLeads
Apollo.io
Four alternativesBetterContact, Clay, Findymail, Snov.io
Clay
Four alternatives6sense, Apollo.io, Demandbase, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: Apollo.io, Clay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, People Data Labs, Seamless.AI, ZoomInfo
GLM 4.7 FlashXClay
Four alternativesApollo.io, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Apollo.io, ClayChanged
Two alternativesCognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo
Five alternativesApollo.io, Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha
Apollo.io
One alternativeBookYourData
against: Lusha
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, Lusha, Seamless.AI, ZoomInfo
MiniMax M2.5Apollo.io
Two alternativesHubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Leadspace, ZoomInfoChanged
Three alternativesClay, Dealfront, Full Enrich
Apollo.io, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Three alternativesClay, Cognism, ZoomInfo
Apollo.io
Three alternativesClay, Lusha, folk CRM
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaClay
Two alternativesApollo.io, HubSpot-native enrichment
Apollo.ioChanged
Two alternativesCognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
no first choice
Seven alternativesApollo.io, Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, People Data Labs, ZoomInfo
Apollo.io
One alternativeHubSpot Breeze Intelligence
against: Clay
no first choiceagainst: Apollo.io, Clay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Muse Glimmer 30BApollo.io
Three alternativesClay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, ZoomInfo
Apollo.ioHeld
Two alternativesClay, Cognism
no first choice
Seven alternativesApollo.io, Clay, Cognism, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Lusha, Unify, ZoomInfo
against: Demandbase
Apollo.io
Two alternativesFullEnrich, Lusha
no first choiceagainst: 6sense, Adapt, Apollo.io, Datanyze, Demandbase, Lusha Systems
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:38yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:28yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:17no017 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:53yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:38yes1011 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:00yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:28yes2336 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:01yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:33yes925 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:07yes1523 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:23yes1555 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:59yes1436 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:10yes211 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:49yes1523 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:03no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:38yes55 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:46no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:44yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:50yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:38yes56 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:11yes2522 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:45yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:52no027 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:05yes1424 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:25yes1898 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:28yes542 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:45yes315 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:53yes1515 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:33yes108 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:18yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:32no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:59yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:12yes516 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:45yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:45yes2348 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:56yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:03yes1023 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:47yes1043 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:54yes1587 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:00yes526 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:55yes731 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:59yes1331 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:24yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:47yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:27yes516 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:51yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:11yes1010 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:38yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:04yes2016 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:06yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:17yes533 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:35yes531 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:56yes2594 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:44yes527 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:27yes310 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:14yes1514 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:44no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:21no04 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:00no014 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:51yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:08yes1013 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:03no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:45yes2042 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:10yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:02yes521 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:09yes1453 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:41yes937 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:34no015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:10yes332 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:38no05 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:07yes109 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:24yes35 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:54yes826 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:37yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:44yes2417 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:00yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:12yes2539 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:24yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:45no027 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:12yes2436 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:09yes2476 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:21no015 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:29yes321 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:50yes2427 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
HubSpot (Breeze/Clearbit) read as HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
HubSpot Breeze read as HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
HubSpot Breeze (ex-Clearbit) read as HubSpot Breeze Intelligence
Unresolved, counted raw
AeroLeads / GetProspect
Explorium.ai
FullFunnel
HubSpot Clearbit/Breeze
HubSpot-native enrichment
Pipecorn
Techsalerator
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Data clean roomsDMP →