September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › Threat intel › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

Threat intelligence platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “threat intelligence platform”, and as “cyber threat intelligence feed and platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
61Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud05CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence05Google Threat Intelligence30others

61% of first choices, clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud61%14%59endorsed leader
02CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence5%9%34accepted challenger
03Google Threat Intelligence Lab in the set5%12%24accepted challenger
04Anomali ThreatStream2%11%28accepted challenger
05ThreatConnect2%21%33accepted challenger
06Cyware Intel Exchange2%0%10accepted challenger
07Mandiant Threat Intelligence Lab in the set2%33%18criticized challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10MISP0%40%10criticized challenger
08Flashpoint Ignite0%10%21accepted challenger
09Cyble Vision0%0%10accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Threat Intelligence is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models two times of 44. Mandiant Threat Intelligence is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models one time of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

One product takes 61% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Kimi K2 and GLM 4.7 FlashX changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
14%
8 of 59 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Why avoid "Standard" TIPs (Recorded Future, Mandiant, ThreatConnect)?” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Mandiant Threat Intelligence
33%
6 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“should be cautious about or avoid include: 1. Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) - due to its high pricing, ecosystem lock-in, and limited continuous external monitoring.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
MISP
40%
4 of 10 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“SMB-Focused Tools: Platforms like some open-source (MISP, OpenCTI) or lighter vendors don't handle enterprise data volumes” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
ThreatConnect
21%
7 of 33 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Why avoid "Standard" TIPs (Recorded Future, Mandiant, ThreatConnect)?” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1003 links across 261 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

44 answers · 82 citations · 11 models
vendor site · UpGuard30 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cyware26 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Bitsight25 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ShadowDragon21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Recorded Future19 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cyble19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 14 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best threat intelligence platform”, “threat intelligence platform”, “threat intelligence platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud recordedfuture.com61%163210150,27822
CrowdStrike parent site
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence 5%, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR 2%
7%10274,0005,130
Google Threat Intelligence google.dev5%521,00021881,346109
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 5%
5%3712,240,000403,136
Anomali ThreatStream anomali.com2%107140413,320318
ThreatConnect threatconnect.com2%1111,000241,4360
Cyware Intel Exchange cyware.com2%22017,73683
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence 2%
2%2418,1003,525
Group-IB Threat Intelligence group-ib.com2%1544,29915
Mandiant mandiant.com
Mandiant Threat Intelligence 2%
2%426,600253225

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cyware.com, shadowdragon.io). The first result for “best threat intelligence platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best threat intelligence platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which cyber threat intelligence feed and platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade threat intelligence platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best threat intelligence platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a threat intelligence platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which threat intelligence platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceRecorded Future Intelligence CloudChanged
Three alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Flashpoint Ignite, Unit 42
no first choice
Four alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloudno first choiceagainst: AlienVault Open Threat Exchange
GPT-5.4 miniRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesFlashpoint Ignite, Intel 471
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Five alternativesFlashpoint Ignite, Google Cloud, Intel 471, KELA, ZeroFox Intelligence
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Five alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, MISP, Mandiant/Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Group-IB Threat Intelligence
Two alternativesRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud, SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCyware Intel Exchange
Five alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flare, Google Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, SpyCloud
Anomali ThreatStream, ThreatConnectChanged
Five alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, OpenCTI, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Five alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, EclecticIQ Intelligence Center, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
OpenCTI
Three alternativesCyware Intel Exchange, Flare, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Anomali ThreatStream, MISP, OpenCTI, ThreatConnect
Perplexity SonarRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Four alternativesCloudSEK, Cyble Vision, Flashpoint Ignite, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Six alternativesAbuse.ch, CloudSEK, Cyble Vision, MalwareBazaar, Spamhaus, URLHaus
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Eight alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CloudSEK, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyble Vision, Flashpoint Ignite, Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, UnderDefense MDRagainst: Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloudno first choiceagainst: Cloudflare Cloudforce One, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, MISP, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, VirusTotal
Grok 4.20Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Four alternativesBitsight, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Three alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Four alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
One alternativeCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
against: Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesCyble Vision, Mandiant/Google Threat Intelligence
against: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, MISP, Mandiant/Google, OpenCTI, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
Mistral SmallCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
One alternativeGoogle Threat Intelligence
Google Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence CloudChanged
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyble Vision, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Six alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyble Vision, Cyware Intel Exchange, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
CrowdStrike Falcon XDR
One alternativeRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
against: Google Threat Intelligence
no first choiceagainst: Flashpoint Ignite, Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
DeepSeek V4 FlashRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Google Threat Intelligence
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Five alternativesBitsight, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, Intel 471
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Seven alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyware Intel Exchange, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, MISP, ThreatConnect, ZeroFox Intelligence
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
One alternativeGoogle Threat Intelligence
against: CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Google Security Operations
no first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceRecorded Future Intelligence Cloudno first choiceagainst: Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Qwen 3.7 FlashRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Three alternativesFlashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Five alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, IBM Security X-Force, Intel 471, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence
no first choiceagainst: Anomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike, MISP, OpenCTI, Palo Alto Cortex, SentinelOne TI modules, Silobreaker
Kimi K2Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Six alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Bitsight, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Flashpoint Ignite, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Google Threat Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence CloudChanged
Four alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Mimecast, Proofpoint Emerging Threats, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Four alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Two alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
against: Google Threat Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Three alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Google Threat Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence
against: ThreatConnect
against: Anomali ThreatStream, Exabeam, Mandiant/Google Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
GLM 4.7 FlashXRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Seven alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, Check Point Exposure Management, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Cyberint, Cyble Vision, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
against: MISP / OpenCTI
Microsoft Sentinel, Q-Feeds, Recorded Future Intelligence FeedChanged
Two alternativesCyble Vision, Google Threat Intelligence Feed
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Five alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect, ZeroFox Intelligence
Microsoft Sentinel
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, OpenCTI
against: Mandiant Threat Intelligence, Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, ThreatConnect
no first choiceagainst: Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
MiniMax M2.5Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Four alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Google Threat Intelligence, ThreatConnect
Recorded Future Intelligence CloudHeld
Three alternativesAnomali ThreatStream, CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence, Mandiant Threat Intelligence
no first choiceRecorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Three alternativesFlare, Group-IB Threat Intelligence, Threat Landscape
no first choiceagainst: Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:47no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 14:02yes37 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:36yes1425 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:00yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:08yes3113 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:06yes89 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:54yes1821 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:43yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:21no034 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:21yes1852 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:44yes12134 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:51yes1037 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:56yes148 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:21yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:23yes1622 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:08yes207 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:23yes3816 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:14yes107 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:13yes1623 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:48yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:50yes1039 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:34yes1939 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:20yes1447 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:54yes527 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:27yes1815 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:23yes815 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:45yes1927 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:23yes2010 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:29yes2214 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:46yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:39yes1925 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:12yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:16yes541 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:46yes1234 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:04yes2573 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:35yes517 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:14yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:48yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:08yes1422 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:02yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:14yes3618 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:03yes108 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:23yes1925 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:31yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:25yes976 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:46yes2885 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:01yes25110 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:46yes1969 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:05no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:36no012 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:58yes827 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:50yes2011 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:06yes2414 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:00no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:26yes1926 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:24yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:16no047 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:49yes2841 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:05yes2678 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:32yes1026 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:34yes158 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 14:02yes39 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:32yes2429 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:55yes207 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:23yes2718 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:53yes129 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:01yes2837 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:24yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:22yes1056 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:58yes1875 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:32yes2162 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:24yes1030 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Anomali read as Anomali ThreatStream
Anomali (ThreatStream Next-Gen) read as Anomali ThreatStream
Anomali (ThreatStream) read as Anomali ThreatStream
CrowdStrike Adversary Intelligence read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
CrowdStrike Falcon Adversary Intelligence read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
CrowdStrike Falcon Intell read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intel read as CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence
Cyble read as Cyble Vision
Cyware read as Cyware Intel Exchange
Cyware (Intel Exchange - CFX) read as Cyware Intel Exchange
Cyware (Intel Exchange / CTIX) read as Cyware Intel Exchange
Cyware (Intel Exchange) read as Cyware Intel Exchange
Flashpoint read as Flashpoint Ignite
Flashpoint (Ignite) read as Flashpoint Ignite
Flashpoint (by Intelfire) read as Flashpoint Ignite
Google / Mandiant Threat Intelligence read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Cloud Mandiant read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant (FireEye) read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant (Mandiant Advantage + Gemini) read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant (Mandiant Advantage) read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant (Threat Intelligence) read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Mandiant Advantage read as Google Threat Intelligence
Google Threat Intelligence / Mandiant read as Google Threat Intelligence
Group-IB read as Group-IB Threat Intelligence
IBM X-Force read as IBM X-Force Exchange
Mandiant read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant (Google Cloud) read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant (by Google Cloud) read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant Advantage read as Mandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant Advantage Threat Intelligence read as Mandiant/Google Threat Intelligence
Microsoft Defender TI read as Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
Recorded Future read as Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
Recorded Future (Intelligence Cloud) read as Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud
SOCRadar read as SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
ZeroFox read as ZeroFox Intelligence
ZeroFox (Intelligence) read as ZeroFox Intelligence
Unresolved, counted raw
Ancrowdstrike
Any.Run
Dataminr
EclecticIQ Intelligence Center
Filigran (OpenCTI Enterprise Edition)
Financial ISAC (FS-ISAC)
Google Threat Intelligence Feed
IBM Security X-Force
Malware Bazaar
Proofpoint Emerging Threats
Q-Feeds
Recorded Future Intelligence Feed
SentinelOne TI modules
Splunk TI Framework
Threat Landscape
ThreatStream
UnderDefense MDR
VulnDB
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← TPRMVuln management →