Penetration testing as a service for enterprise buyers
Asked as “penetration testing service”, and as “pentest-as-a-service provider”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Synack 23%
40NetSPI23Synack15Cobalt23others
40% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Mandiant is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05H06
07
08B09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01NetSPI40%
NetSPI40%02Synack23%
Synack23%03Cobalt15%
Cobalt15%04Bishop Fox4%
Bishop Fox4%05BreachLock4%
BreachLock4%06HackerOne PTaaS4%
07NCC Group2%
NCC Group2%08Mandiant0%
Mandiant0%09Bugcrowd PTaaS0%
What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bugcrowd PTaaS
25%
3 of 12 labels negative · 2 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid pure crowdsourced (HackerOne/Bugcrowd) due to variable bounties/credits” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Bishop Fox7%
2 of 27 labels negative · 2 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Predictable Cost ... Costs scale unpredictably as scope expands.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
HackerOne PTaaS
14%
3 of 21 labels negative · 1 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid pure crowdsourced (HackerOne/Bugcrowd) due to variable bounties/credits” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
AttackIQ Flex100%
1 of 1 labels negative · 1 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid pure pay-as-you-go services like AttackIQ Flex unless your testing volume is tightly controlled” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 980 links across 233 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Synack46 answers · 67 citations · 12 models
vendor site · DeepStrike45 answers · 84 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Stingrai32 answers · 50 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cybri25 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · UnderDefense25 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Software Secured23 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Bright Defense16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Redbot Security14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best penetration testing service”, “penetration testing service”, “penetration testing services”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetSPI netspi.com | 40% | 67 | 1,900 | 58 | 4,142 | $336 | 43 | |
| Synack synack.com | 23% | 66 | 2,400 | 59 | 6,764 | 7 | 4 | |
| Cobalt cobalt.io | 15% | 127 | 135,000 | 27,732 | 23,655 | 14 | ||
| Bishop Fox bishopfox.com | 4% | 44 | 1,600 | 18 | 23,962 | 1 | ||
| BreachLock breachlock.com | 4% | 81 | 590 | 6 | 2,479 | 22 | ||
| HackerOne PTaaS hackerone.com | 4% | 34 | 2,038,087 | 7 | ||||
| Pentera pentera.io | 4% | 123 | 1,900 | 49 | 9,580 | 0 | ||
| NCC Group nccgroup.com | 2% | 32 | 1,300 | 79 | 3,182 | 10 | ||
| Deloitte deloitte.com | 2% | 8 | 301,000 | 14,412 | 881,066 | $2,177 | 117 | |
| Terra Security terra.security | 2% | 3,170 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybri.com, getastra.com, redbotsecurity.com, synack.com). The first result for “best penetration testing service” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best penetration testing service for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which pentest-as-a-service provider would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade penetration testing services and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best penetration testing service for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a penetration testing service. What should we look at?”Negative“Which penetration testing services should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5NetSPINetSPI, SynackChangedno first choiceSynackno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
BreachLock, NCC Group, SynackOne alternative
IBM X-Force RedFive alternatives
Coalfire, Cobalt, IBM X-Force Red, NetSPI, SynackThree alternatives
Cobalt, Invicti, PenteraGPT-5.4 miniNetSPICobaltChangedno first choiceHackerOne PTaaSagainst: AttackIQ Flexno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
BreachLock, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Pentera, UnderDefenseTwo alternatives
Bugcrowd PTaaS, SynackOne alternative
CobaltOne alternative
CobaltGemini 3.5 FlashNetSPINetSPI, SynackChangedno first choiceBreachLock, Cobaltno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bishop Fox, BreachLock, Cobalt, SynackFour alternatives
Bishop Fox Cosmos, Bugcrowd PTaaS, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaSEight alternatives
Bishop Fox, BreachLock, Cobalt, Mandiant, NCC Group, NetSPI, Pentera, SynackThree alternatives
Horizon3.ai NodeZero, KnowBe4, PenteraPerplexity SonarNetSPINetSPIHeldNetSPINetSPIno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
AppSecure Security, Bishop Fox, Cobalt, Mandiant, NCC Group, Redbot Security, SynackTwo alternatives
Bishop Fox, SynackSix alternatives
Bishop Fox, Coalfire, Cobalt, Mandiant, Rapid7, SynackTwo alternatives
Cobalt, SynackGrok 4.20Bishop Fox, NetSPIagainst: HackerOne PTaaS, Intruder, Pentest-Tools.comNetSPI, SynackChangedagainst: Bugcrowd PTaaS, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaSCobalt, SynackNetSPIagainst: Bugcrowd PTaaS, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaSno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Mandiant, NCC Group, SynackOne alternative
Bishop FoxThree alternatives
Bishop Fox, Coalfire, NetSPIFour alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cybri, Invicti, SynackMistral SmallDeloitte, Terra SecurityNetSPIChangedBishop FoxSynackno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Astra SecurityFour alternatives
BreachLock, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, SynackSix alternatives
Cobalt, Deloitte, Invicti, NCC Group, NetSPI, PraetorianThree alternatives
Cobalt, Cybri, NetSPIDeepSeek V4 FlashBishop Fox, NetSPINetSPI, SynackChangedNetSPIHackerOne PTaaSagainst: Bishop Fox, Bugcrowd PTaaS, IBM X-Force Red, NCC Group, Risk72no first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Coalfire, SynackTwo alternatives
Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaSEight alternatives
Bishop Fox, Bugcrowd PTaaS, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, IBM X-Force Red, Mandiant, NCC Group, SynackThree alternatives
Pentera, Picus Security, SynackLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBreachLockChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
DeepStrike, NetSPI, Software SecuredQwen 3.7 FlashCobalt, SynackCobaltChangedCobaltPenterano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bishop Fox, Secops, Trustwave, VerSpriteThree alternatives
Antisyphon, Bugcrowd PTaaS, ImmuniWebSix alternatives
Bishop Fox, BreachLock, HackerOne PTaaS, IBM X-Force Red, Offensive Security Services, SynackThree alternatives
Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, SafeBreachKimi K2Cobalt, SynackNetSPI, SynackChangedNetSPICobaltno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Bishop Fox, HackerOne PTaaS, NCC Group, NetSPIOne alternative
Bishop FoxSeven alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, CrowdStrike, HackerOne PTaaS, Mandiant, Rapid7, SynackTwo alternatives
NetSPI, SynackGLM 4.7 FlashXNetSPINetSPIHeldNetSPI, SynackCobalt, NetSPI, Pentera, Synackagainst: Bishop Foxno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Astra Security, Bishop Fox, Cobalt, SynackTwo alternatives
Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaSFive alternatives
Bishop Fox, Cobalt, IBM X-Force Red, Mandiant, SecureworksOne alternative
SimbianMiniMax M2.5NCC GroupNetSPIChangedno first choiceSynackno first choicenothing named
Eight alternatives
Bugcrowd PTaaS, Deloitte, EY, IBM X-Force, IOActive, PwC, Rapid7, SynackThree alternatives
DeepStrike, Stingrai, SynackThree alternatives
Cymptom, GuidePoint, PentestasBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:51 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:02 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:39 | yes | 21 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:16 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:40 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:16 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 15 | 71 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:38 | no | 0 | 60 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:23 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:36 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:20 | yes | 36 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:49 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:20 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:59 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:17 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 31 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:14 | yes | 13 | 58 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:26 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:02 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:18 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:50 | yes | 34 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:00 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:28 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:15 | yes | 29 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:10 | yes | 33 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:15 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:11 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:41 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:29 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:29 | yes | 38 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:30 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:35 | yes | 26 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:36 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:11 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:59 | yes | 22 | 119 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:07 | yes | 15 | 79 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:38 | yes | 18 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:13 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:44 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:05 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:36 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:50 | yes | 30 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:12 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:09 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 14:10 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:28 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:14 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:04 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:23 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:48 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:52 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:26 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:01 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:22 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:20 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:31 | yes | 14 | 110 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 5 | 83 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Astra read as Astra Security
Bugcrowd read as Bugcrowd PTaaS
HackerOne read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne (Business Program) read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne Business Protect read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne Enterprise / Enterprise Plus read as HackerOne PTaaS
HackerOne Pentest read as HackerOne PTaaS
Horizon3.ai read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Unresolved, counted raw
Axipro
Canima
Cobalt Strike
Coral Esecure
CyberGlobal
Cymptom
GuidePoint
Offensive Security Services
Q-Sec
Rackpoint
Risk72
SecFusion
Secops (RedTeam.com)
Verizon Enterprise Solutions (RISK Team)
Vynox
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.