September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › ASM › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

Attack surface management for enterprise buyers

Asked as “attack surface management platform”, and as “external attack surface monitoring tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 43 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
21%
Contested · Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management 21%
21Bitsight21Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management16Cortex Xpanse42others

21% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
02Bitsight21%4%25accepted challenger
03Cortex Xpanse16%18%44accepted challenger
04CyCognito9%21%38accepted challenger
05CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management5%8%12accepted challenger
06CrowdStrike Falcon Surface5%26%19criticized challenger
07Tenable Attack Surface Management2%19%32accepted challenger
08IONIX2%0%13accepted challenger
09Wiz2%17%12accepted challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Censys ASM0%39%28criticized challenger
11IBM Randori0%9%11accepted challenger
10Synack0%0%20accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management21%
02Bitsight21%
03Cortex Xpanse16%
04CyCognito9%
05CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management5%
06CrowdStrike Falcon Surface5%
07Tenable Attack Surface Management2%
08IONIX2%
09Wiz2%
10Synack0%
11IBM Randori0%
12Censys ASM0%

What they warned about

Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Censys ASM
39%
11 of 28 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“Tools that do not validate the exploitability of discovered vulnerabilities (e.g., Censys as a standalone) may overwhelm security teams with false positives” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Cortex Xpanse
18%
8 of 44 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“Platforms tightly integrated with a single vendor's ecosystem (e.g., Cortex Xpanse, Defender EASM, Falcon Surface, Tenable ASM) may not be suitable” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
18%
7 of 40 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“❌ Poor — invoice scales with discovery, which grows unboundedly” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
CyCognito
21%
8 of 38 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid: Pure per-asset metered plans from vendors like CyCognito or Tenable” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

68 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1028 links across 243 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · UpGuard52 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Synack44 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bitsight43 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks30 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
vendor site · IONIX30 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Wiz25 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CyCognito23 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SentinelOne14 answers · 16 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “attack surface management platform”, “attack surface management platforms”, “best attack surface management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management 21%
21%15818,1003,525
Bitsight bitsight.com21%1604,400146126,245$6031
Palo Alto Cortex cortex.io
Cortex Xpanse 16%
16%115170416,7826
CyCognito cycognito.com9%13159069,93537
CrowdStrike parent site
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management 5%, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface 5%, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface / Exposure Management 0%
9%6574,0005,130
Google Cloud mandiant.com
Mandiant Attack Surface Management 5%
5%20165,0007,596225
Tenable parent site
Tenable Attack Surface Management 2%
2%7727,1001,194
IONIX ionix.io2%82,4001315,7338
Wiz wiz.io2%76440,50016,751102,573$6,856120
ExternalSight externalsight.com2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cycognito.com, gartner.com, paloaltonetworks.com, sentinelone.com, synack.com, upguard.com). The first result for “attack surface management platform” is sentinelone.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best attack surface management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which external attack surface monitoring tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade attack surface management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best attack surface management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an attack surface management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which attack surface management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Bitsight
Four alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Synack
BitsightHeld
Three alternativesCyCognito, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Bitsight
Three alternativesCortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Wiz Attack Surface Management
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Three alternativesBitsight, Cortex Xpanse, Tenable Attack Surface Management
no first choiceagainst: Mandiant Attack Surface Management
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Two alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface / Exposure Management
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Tenable Attack Surface ManagementChanged
One alternativeRapid7 Surface Command
Cortex Xpanse
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Mandiant Attack Surface Management
One alternativeObsonis Enterprise
against: Attaxion, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
no first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Security and IT Operations, Pentera, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, RedHunt Labs ASM Platform
Gemini 3.5 FlashWiz
Six alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito, IONIX, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Palo Alto Networks, Synack
CyCognito, IONIXChanged
Four alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Wiz
Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Five alternativesCensys ASM, CyCognito, IBM Randori, IONIX, Synack
runZero
Three alternativesCensys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito
against: Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Nudge Security
no first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Shodan-style aggregators, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Perplexity SonarBitsight
Three alternativesCyCognito, Synack, Wiz
Cortex XpanseChanged
Four alternativesBitsight, Censys ASM, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Cortex Xpanse
Five alternativesCensys ASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface / Exposure Management, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
against: Wiz
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
One alternativeCortex Xpanse
no first choiceagainst: Attaxion, Bishop Fox Cosmos, Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Detectify, Intruder, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
Grok 4.20CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management
Two alternativesCortex Xpanse, Rapid7 Exposure Command
CyCognitoChanged
Four alternativesBitsight, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, IONIX
Cortex Xpanse
Five alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito, IONIX, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Synack
against: IBM Randori
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Qualys External Attack Surface Management
against: CyCognito, Detectify, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito
Six alternativesCensys ASM, Detectify, IBM Randori, IONIX, Mandiant Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
against: Armis, Censys ASM, CyCognito, Microsoft Purview, Rapid7 InsightVM
Mistral SmallBitsight
Two alternativesIntruder, Synack
Bitsight, Cortex XpanseChanged
One alternativeAssetnote
Synack
Six alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, IONIX, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
against: Censys ASM
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Managementno first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashBitsight
Six alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, Synack, Tenable Attack Surface Management
CyCognitoChanged
Three alternativesBitsight, Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito
Six alternativesCensys ASM, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, IBM Randori, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Mandiant Attack Surface Managementagainst: CTM360, Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Shockwaveno first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Orca Security
Llama 4 MaverickBitsight
Three alternativesCensys ASM, Synack, UpGuard BreachSight
CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, ExternalSight, Ivanti Neurons for EASMChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashBitsight
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, CyCognito, UpGuard BreachSight
Cortex XpanseChanged
Three alternativesCyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Wiz
CyCognito
Four alternativesBitsight, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Mandiant Attack Surface Management
FullHunt ASM, Trickest ASM
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, UpGuard BreachSight
against: Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Wiz
no first choicenothing named
Kimi K2Cortex Xpanse
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Rapid7 Exposure Command, Tenable Attack Surface Management
Cortex XpanseHeld
Two alternativesCyCognito, IBM Randori
no first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, CyCognitoMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Two alternativesFullHunt Enterprise, Tenable Attack Surface Management
against: Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito
no first choiceagainst: Censys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex Xpanse
Five alternativesCyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Synack, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Wiz
against: Censys ASM, Detectify, Intruder, VeilScan
Cortex XpanseHeld
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Wiz
Synack
Six alternativesCensys ASM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Wiz
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Tenable Attack Surface Managementno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Cortex Xpanse, JupiterOne, ReliaQuest GreyMatter
MiniMax M2.5Bitsight
Three alternativesCortex Xpanse, SecPod SanerNow, Synack
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface ManagementChanged
Five alternativesBitsight, Censys ASM, Qualys External Attack Surface Management, SecurityScorecard, Tenable Attack Surface Management
CyCognito, Synack
Three alternativesBitsight, Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
against: Censys ASM
Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Four alternativesCortex Xpanse, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface, CyCognito, Mandiant Attack Surface Management
no first choicenothing named
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:40yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:05yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:22yes1428 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:01yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:33yes3522 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:19yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:22yes911 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:10yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:54yes934 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:12yes1734 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:58yes2784 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:26yes516 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:41yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:28yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:53yes1427 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:35yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 14:06yes2116 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:54yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-09-17 13:46yes2549 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 14:02yes105 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:14yes520 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:57yes1841 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:20yes2435 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:06no049 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:46yes1110 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:01yes611 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:10yes1627 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:52yes2013 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:45yes3119 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:52yes1215 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:12yes1730 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:16yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:25yes952 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:56yes1638 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:34yes2077 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:28yes1230 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:12yes1411 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:06yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:58yes1535 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:24yes127 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:36yes1813 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:33yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:55yes2330 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:14yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:38yes28126 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:27yes2372 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 14:00yes20155 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:43yes1589 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:26yes1814 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 14:00yes415 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:06yes931 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:31yes1711 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:50yes3217 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:54no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-09-17 13:01yes2886 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:16yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:36no038 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:06no081 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:40yes29135 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:41yes966 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:40yes2810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:50yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:18yes1825 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:06yes208 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 13:54yes2116 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:13yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:36yes2633 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:53yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:33yes1435 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:38yes2873 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:09yes3385 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 12:24yes525 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Attaxion read as Attaxion
Censys read as Censys ASM
Mandiant/Google read as Mandiant Attack Surface Management
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management
Qualys read as Qualys External Attack Surface Management
SentinelOne (Attivo) read as SentinelOne ASM
Tenable read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
Tenable ASM / Tenable One read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
Tenable One read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
Tenable One (with ASM) read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
Tenable One / Tenable ASM read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform read as Tenable Attack Surface Management
UpGuard read as UpGuard BreachSight
attaxion read as Attaxion
Unresolved, counted raw
Assetnote
Attack Surface Management Platform by AttackSurfaceManagement.com
CrowdStrike Falcon Security and IT Operations
FullHunt ASM
FullHunt Enterprise
Ivanti Neurons for EASM
Obsonis Enterprise
RedHunt Labs ASM Platform
Reposify
Shodan-style aggregators
Trickest ASM
Wiz Attack Surface Management
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← API securityBAS →