Compliance automation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “compliance automation platform”, and as “SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 40 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48Vanta18Drata05HiComply30others
48% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Vanta48%
Vanta48%02Drata18%
Drata18%03Hyperproof5%
Hyperproof5%04Secureframe2%
Secureframe2%05OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance2%06Scrut Automation2%
Scrut Automation2%07ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management2%08AuditBoard0%
AuditBoard0%09MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%10Scytale0%
Scytale0%11Thoropass0%
Thoropass0%12Archer0%
Archer0%13Sprinto0%
Sprinto0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Drata28%
17 of 60 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Examples: *Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe* ... often unsuitable for large enterprises as a sole solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Vanta23%
15 of 65 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“the search results indicate significant red flags for large enterprises, specifically regarding scalability, support, and flexibility.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Secureframe28%
11 of 40 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Tools like Secureframe often rely on their own lightweight endpoint agents ... is a security risk and an administrative headache.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Sprinto43%
9 of 21 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Examples: *Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe* ... often unsuitable for large enterprises as a sole solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
65 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1057 links across 269 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Vanta52 answers · 105 citations · 12 models
34 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Optro34 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Drata18 answers · 27 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Sprinto17 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Consilien16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Guideflow15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 31 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Cynomi13 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Strac13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platform”, “compliance automation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta vanta.com | 48% | 381 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | 1 | |
| Drata drata.com | 18% | 368 | 9,900 | 257 | 36,413 | 54 | 7 | |
| Hyperproof hyperproof.io | 5% | 173 | 1,600 | 37 | 64,238 | $59 | 34 | |
| HiComply hicomply.com | 5% | 2 | ||||||
| Secureframe secureframe.com | 2% | 235 | 2,400 | 39 | 45,014 | 27 | ||
| OneTrust onetrust.com OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance 2%, OneTrust Certification Automation 0% | 2% | 49 | 14,800 | 624 | 54,294 company | 58 | ||
| Mitratech Alyne mitratech.com | 2% | 18 | 10 | 0 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 | |
| Scrut Automation scrut.io | 2% | 117 | 390 | 10 | 10,568 | 34 | 9 | |
| Anecdotes anecdotes.ai | 2% | 8 | ||||||
| Centraleyes centraleyes.com | 2% | 42 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cynomi.com, drata.com, gartner.com, optro.ai, vanta.com). The first result for “best compliance automation platform” is vanta.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best compliance automation platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SOC 2 and ISO 27001 automation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade compliance automation platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best compliance automation platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a compliance automation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which compliance automation platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceDrata, VantaChangedDrataagainst: NetwrixHiComplyno first choicenothing named
One alternative
SecureframeThree alternatives
Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, OptroGPT-5.4 miniVantaVantaHeldno first choiceScrut Automationno first choiceagainst: Drata
Five alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, SecureframeTwo alternatives
Drata, SecureframeEight alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Scrut Automation, Scytale, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Thoropass, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, ThoropassGemini 3.5 FlashVantaVantaHeldagainst: OptroDrata, VantaDrataagainst: AuditBoard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaAnecdotesagainst: Archer, Drata, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Scytale, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Vanta
Three alternatives
Anecdotes, Drata, OptroTwo alternatives
Drata, HyperproofThree alternatives
Anecdotes, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, OptroTwo alternatives
Complyance, HyperproofFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, VantaPerplexity SonarVantaagainst: Drata, Scrut Automation, SprintoDrataChangedDrata, Secureframe, VantaMitratech Alyneagainst: Drata, Hyperproof, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Vanta, Whaleno first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass, Vanta
Two alternatives
ComplyDo, OrbiqTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, VantaNine alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Optro, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, WorkivaOne alternative
OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceGrok 4.20Drata, VantaVantaChangedagainst: OneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceOneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementagainst: Drata, LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, Scytale, Secureframe, Sprinto, Thoropass, Vanta
Three alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, SecureframeTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, DrataFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
Archer, AuditBoardFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Secureframe, VantaMistral SmallVantaSecureframe, VantaChangedMetricStreamVantano first choiceagainst: Drata, Scytale, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Two alternatives
Drata, SprintoTwo alternatives
Drata, ScytaleSeven alternatives
Archer, Drata, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, HyperproofDeepSeek V4 FlashVantaVantaHeldagainst: SecureframeVantaZenGRCagainst: AuditBoard, ComplyJet, Drata, LogicGate, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, IBM OpenPages, Integromat, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, RiskWatch, Secureframe, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Thoropass, Vanta, Workato, Zapier
Four alternatives
Centraleyes, Drata, Orbiq, SecureframeThree alternatives
Drata, OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementEight alternatives
AuditBoard, Diligent, Drata, Hyperproof, LogicGate, Scytale, Secureframe, ThoropassTwo alternatives
HiComply, LowerPlaneFive alternatives
Centraleyes, Drata, Secureframe, Thoropass, VantaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceVantaChangedno first choiceVantano first choiceagainst: Drata, Secureframe, Vanta
Two alternatives
Orbiq, VantaQwen 3.7 FlashDrataVantaChangedDrata, VantaHiComply, LowerPlaneagainst: Drata, Vantano first choiceagainst: Archer, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Vanta
Five alternatives
AuditBoard, InterScan, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Secureframe, VantaTwo alternatives
AuditBoard, DrataFour alternatives
AuditBoard, Hyperproof, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementKimi K2Drata, VantaVantaChangedDrata, VantaHyperproofagainst: Drata, VantaDrataagainst: Drata, Hyperproof, MetricStream, OneTrust GRC, Scrut Automation, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Sprinto, Strike Graph
Three alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementOne alternative
DrataThree alternatives
Hyperproof, Mitratech Alyne, SecureframeTwo alternatives
OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, episkiTwo alternatives
Hyperproof, VantaGLM 4.7 FlashXOneTrust Tech Risk & ComplianceSureCloudChangedno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementCentraleyesno first choiceagainst: Drata, Thoropass, Vanta
Seven alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, LogicGate, Mitratech Alyne, Sprinto, VantaTwo alternatives
Compyl, VantaEleven alternatives
AuditBoard, Drata, Hyperproof, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, OneTrust Certification Automation, OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance, Scytale, Secureframe, Sprinto, VantaTwo alternatives
Drata, VantaMiniMax M2.5Vantano first choiceChangedno first choiceHyperproofagainst: ComplyJet, Drata, Secureframe, Vantano first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Orbiq, Process StreetBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:32 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:24 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:44 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:57 | yes | 31 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:53 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:23 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 09:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:45 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:57 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:25 | yes | 22 | 66 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:46 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:09 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:05 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:50 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:44 | yes | 37 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:18 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:56 | yes | 28 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:07 | yes | 10 | 83 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:39 | yes | 20 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:41 | yes | 19 | 103 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:33 | yes | 5 | 56 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:55 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:20 | yes | 6 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:32 | yes | 27 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 09:12 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:42 | yes | 34 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:17 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:09 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:54 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:44 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:55 | yes | 27 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:58 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:57 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:40 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:54 | yes | 20 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:24 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:22 | yes | 23 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:43 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:12 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:05 | yes | 14 | 109 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:49 | yes | 20 | 227 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:13 | yes | 29 | 131 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:23 | yes | 21 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:50 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:19 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 08:42 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:35 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:21 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:46 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 08:24 | yes | 39 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 09:07 | no | 0 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:29 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 13 | 134 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 08:34 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 08:47 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 08:49 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:07 | yes | 27 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 08:17 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 08:43 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 08:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:10 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 08:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 08:46 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 08:59 | yes | 26 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 08:51 | yes | 29 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:09 | no | 0 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
OneTrust read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
OneTrust Tech Risk and Compliance read as OneTrust Tech Risk & Compliance
Scrut read as Scrut Automation
Unresolved, counted raw
ComplyDo
Integromat
InterScan
Whale
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.