Data loss prevention for enterprise buyers
Asked as “data loss prevention platform”, and as “DLP tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 42 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
52%
Clear leader
52Microsoft Purview DLP19Forcepoint DLP12Symantec Data Loss Prevention17others
52% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Microsoft Purview DLP vs CurrentWareMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Safetica ONEMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Nightfall AI
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Purview DLP vs CyberhavenMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Forcepoint DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs miniOrange DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Netskope DLPCurrentWare vs Safetica ONECurrentWare vs Nightfall AICurrentWare vs CyberhavenCurrentWare vs Forcepoint DLPCurrentWare vs miniOrange DLPCurrentWare vs Netskope DLPSafetica ONE vs Nightfall AISafetica ONE vs CyberhavenSafetica ONE vs Forcepoint DLPSafetica ONE vs miniOrange DLPSafetica ONE vs Netskope DLPNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNightfall AI vs Forcepoint DLPNightfall AI vs miniOrange DLPNightfall AI vs Netskope DLPCyberhaven vs Forcepoint DLPCyberhaven vs miniOrange DLPCyberhaven vs Netskope DLPForcepoint DLP vs miniOrange DLPForcepoint DLP vs Netskope DLPminiOrange DLP vs Netskope DLP
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Microsoft Purview DLP52%
Microsoft Purview DLP52%02Forcepoint DLP19%
Forcepoint DLP19%03Symantec Data Loss Prevention12%
Symantec Data Loss Prevention12%04Cyberhaven5%
Cyberhaven5%05Netskope DLP2%
Netskope DLP2%06Proofpoint Enterprise DLP2%
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP2%07Fortra DLP2%
Fortra DLP2%08Zscaler Internet Access0%
Zscaler Internet Access0%09Trellix DLP0%
Trellix DLP0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention36%
20 of 55 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Platforms to Strongly Avoid or Approach with Extreme Caution (Legacy/High-Risk for Large Enterprises): - Traditional/Legacy DLP Solutions (e.g., older Symantec DLP/Broadcom” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Microsoft Purview DLP16%
10 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 12 models
“Microsoft's DLP documentation, for instance, lists concrete platform limits such as maximum policy/rule sizes and action constraints. That doesn't make it "bad," but it's a reminder to check scale limits” GPT-5.4 mini, negative prompt
Forcepoint DLP18%
10 of 56 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Steep Learning Curve and Resource Demands... resource-intensive, potentially slowing down endpoint devices” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Trellix DLP36%
5 of 14 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“performance issues (slow extensions, slow data transfer), complex configuration ... concerns about high costs” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1019 links across 199 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
49 answers · 71 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Strac44 answers · 59 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Forcepoint42 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · UnderDefense40 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cyberhaven28 answers · 48 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CurrentWare27 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G225 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Proofpoint23 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · miniOrange22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks16 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Netwrix16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Fortra15 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
47 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
38 answers · 11 models
27 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview DLP 52% | 52% | 215 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Forcepoint forcepoint.com Forcepoint DLP 19%, Forcepoint ONE 0% | 19% | 169 | 4,400 | 244 | 25,465 company | 52 | 2 | |
| Broadcom broadcom.com Symantec Data Loss Prevention 12% | 12% | 122 | 390 | 1 | 604,076 company | 0 | ||
| Cyberhaven cyberhaven.com | 5% | 82 | 2,900 | 54 | 13,999 | 22 | ||
| Netskope netskope.com Netskope DLP 2% | 2% | 76 | 18,100 | 830 | 42,119 company | 27 | ||
| Proofpoint parent site Proofpoint Enterprise DLP 2% | 2% | 64 | 27,100 | 1,488 | ||||
| Fortra DLP fortra.com | 2% | 41 | 50 | 0 | 125,581 | $34 | 60 | |
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP 2% | 2% | 17 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| Vectoredge | 2% | |||||||
| Zscaler parent site Zscaler Internet Access 0% | 0% | 71 | 60,500 | 3,104 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forcepoint.com, gartner.com, paloaltonetworks.com, proofpoint.com, strac.io, underdefense.com). The first result for “best data loss prevention platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data loss prevention platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DLP tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade data loss prevention platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a data loss prevention platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data loss prevention platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Forcepoint DLPForcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionChangedForcepoint DLP, StracFortra DLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Data Security Platform
Three alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Strac, Symantec Data Loss PreventionOne alternative
Microsoft Purview DLPFive alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONEGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPHeldMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview DLP
Two alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionFour alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLPThree alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessGemini 3.5 Flashno first choiceCyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLPChangedCyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix/McAfee
Five alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLPTwo alternatives
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionFour alternatives
Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessPerplexity SonarForcepoint DLPForcepoint DLPHeldno first choiceMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind DLP, Trend Micro Integrated DLP
Four alternatives
Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Teramind DLPFour alternatives
Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionSeven alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionSix alternatives
Acronis DeviceLock, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessGrok 4.20Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPSymantec Data Loss PreventionChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionCyberhavenagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix XDR
Three alternatives
Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessThree alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Fortra DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionMistral SmallPalo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPSymantec Data Loss PreventionChangedno first choiceagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: CrowdStrike, Forcepoint DLP, Trellix DLPno first choiceagainst: Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Two alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Fortra Data SecurityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Teramind DLPDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Trellix DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPHeldMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet Accessno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind DLP
Three alternatives
Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionFour alternatives
Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionEight alternatives
Cyberhaven, Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessOne alternative
Fortra DLPFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSymantec Data Loss PreventionChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPHeldFortra DLPagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Three alternatives
Forcepoint ONE, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionTwo alternatives
Digital Guardian, Netskope DLPFour alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Trellix DLPFour alternatives
Netskope DLP, OneTrust, Varonis Data Security Platform, Zscaler Internet AccessKimi K2Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLPagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionForcepoint DLPChangedagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionForcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Two alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLPThree alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPThree alternatives
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPGLM 4.7 FlashXForcepoint DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedno first choiceagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: Check Point DLP, Cisco, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Five alternatives
Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI, Strac, Symantec Data Loss PreventionThree alternatives
Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionNine alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE, Trellix DLPTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection, Forcepoint DLPMiniMax M2.5Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPSymantec Data Loss PreventionChangedSymantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Trellix DLPVectoredgeno first choiceagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Three alternatives
Digital Guardian, Microsoft Purview DLP, Trellix DLPFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONEOne alternative
Microsoft Purview DLPBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:35 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:40 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:22 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:13 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:11 | yes | 37 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:55 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:02 | yes | 9 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:31 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:29 | yes | 18 | 134 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:13 | yes | 12 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:37 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:15 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:34 | yes | 32 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:58 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:32 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:13 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:00 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:10 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:19 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:08 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:54 | yes | 31 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:11 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 09:38 | yes | 25 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:21 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:29 | yes | 10 | 70 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:44 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:27 | yes | 19 | 176 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:34 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:46 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:39 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:08 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:50 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:55 | yes | 42 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:21 | no | 0 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:03 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 14 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:03 | yes | 17 | 76 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:17 | yes | 17 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:38 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:28 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:31 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:23 | yes | 16 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:46 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:50 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:02 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:40 | yes | 18 | 128 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:18 | yes | 9 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:56 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:37 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:15 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:04 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:12 | yes | 24 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 14:12 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 29 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:36 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 28 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:13 | yes | 31 | 207 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:50 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Broadcom/Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Check Point read as Check Point DLP
CrowdStrike Falcon read as CrowdStrike Falcon Data Protection
Forcepoint read as Forcepoint DLP
Fortra read as Fortra DLP
Fortra Digital Guardian read as Fortra DLP
McAfee read as McAfee DLP
Microsoft read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview (Data Loss Prevention) read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Netskope read as Netskope DLP
Nightfall read as Nightfall AI
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Palo Alto Enterprise DLP read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Palo Alto Networks DLP read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Enterprise DLP
Safetica read as Safetica ONE
Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Symantec (Broadcom) read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Symantec/Broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Teramind read as Teramind DLP
Trellix read as Trellix DLP
Trellix Data Loss Prevention (formerly McAfee DLP) read as Trellix DLP
Varonis read as Varonis Data Security Platform
Zscaler read as Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler DLP read as Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler Data Protection read as Zscaler Internet Access
Unresolved, counted raw
Fortra Data Security (formerly Digital Guardian)
Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention
Shinobi Defense System
Trend Micro Integrated DLP
UnderDefense Managed DLP+MDR
Vectoredge
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.