Vulnerability management platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “vulnerability management platform”, and as “vulnerability scanning and management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Tenable Vulnerability Management20Qualys VMDR10Rapid7 InsightVM24others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Rapid7 InsightVM vs IntruderRapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusRapid7 InsightVM vs OpenVAS
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable NessusRapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusIntruder vs OpenVASIntruder vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs Tenable NessusIntruder vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs OpenVASManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Tenable NessusManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS vs Tenable NessusOpenVAS vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Nessus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Tenable Vulnerability Management46%
Tenable Vulnerability Management46%02Qualys VMDR20%
Qualys VMDR20%03Rapid7 InsightVM10%
Rapid7 InsightVM10%04Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management8%05CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight2%
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight2%06Wiz0%
Wiz0%07Orca Security0%
Orca Security0%08CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management0%09CrowdStrike0%
CrowdStrike0%What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Qualys VMDR20%
13 of 64 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Costs | Qualys VMDR | Per-IP pricing ... modular add-ons increase complexity” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Rapid7 InsightVM17%
10 of 58 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid niche/older tools (e.g., deprecated Nexpose, lesser-known like Flexera) lacking enterprise validation.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Tenable Vulnerability Management13%
7 of 55 labels negative · 7 of 12 models
“⭐⭐ (Poor - Spikes with Cloud Growth) ... Only pay a dedicated premium (Qualys/Tenable) if your legal/compliance team strictly mandates a third-party scanner” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight30%
3 of 10 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Custom pricing, bundled with EDR suite” Kimi K2, budget prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 968 links across 216 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
35 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Orca29 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
vendor site · RiskWatch26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 36 citations · 8 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · PDQ18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Tenable17 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Vicarius17 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 8 models
22 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable tenable.com Tenable Vulnerability Management 46% | 46% | 154 | 27,100 | 1,194 | 187,567 company | $9,764 | 62 | 1 |
| Qualys VMDR qualys.com | 20% | 165 | 320 | 16 | 26,929 | 46 | 7 | |
| Rapid7 rapid7.com Rapid7 InsightVM 10% | 10% | 150 | 14,800 | 798 | 123,299 company | $609 | 30 | |
| Microsoft Defender parent site Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management 8% | 8% | 98 | 18,100 | 3,525 | ||||
| Tenable parent site Tenable One 8% | 8% | 17 | 27,100 | 1,194 | ||||
| Nucleus Security nucleussec.com | 2% | 17 | ||||||
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight 2%, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management 0%, CrowdStrike Falcon 0% | 2% | 201 | 74,000 | 5,130 | ||||
| Cymulate cymulate.com | 2% | 177 | 720 | 16 | 16,407 | 3 | ||
| Intruder intruder.io | 2% | 291 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| Wiz wiz.io | 0% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, orca.security, tenable.com). The first result for “best vulnerability management platform” is surecloud.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best vulnerability management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vulnerability scanning and management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade vulnerability management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a vulnerability management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which vulnerability management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceChangedTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRno first choiceagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
Two alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, TaniumTwo alternatives
Tanium, Tenable OneGPT-5.4 miniTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDRTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMFour alternatives
Cisco Vulnerability Management, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVMOne alternative
Tenable OneGemini 3.5 FlashQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDR, Tenable OneChangedTenable Vulnerability ManagementNucleus Securityagainst: Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Snykno first choiceagainst: ConnectSecure, Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Six alternatives
Brinqa, CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Nucleus Security, Orca Security, WizFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizSix alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizThree alternatives
Brinqa, Qualys VMDR, Tenable OnePerplexity SonarTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: CrowdStrike, MetricStream, Rapid7 InsightVM, Riskonnect, WizQualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Action1, Automox, GFI LanGuard, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, NinjaOne, Nuclei, OpenVAS, PDQ, Trivy
Four alternatives
OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizFive alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, WizOne alternative
Qualys VMDRThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, WizGrok 4.20Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMCrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Oneagainst: Flexera, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Two alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Wiz/OrcaOne alternative
WizMistral SmallRapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDRTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMDeepSeek V4 FlashQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMno first choiceagainst: Cisco Vulnerability Management, Microsoft Defender, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Vulnerability Detection & Patching, Orca Security, Qualys AssetView, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternatives
Orca Security, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizOne alternative
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementLlama 4 MaverickRapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruderChangedno first choiceQualys VMDRCymulatenothing named
One alternative
BinarlyTwo alternatives
Arctic Wolf, ConnectSecureQwen 3.7 FlashTenable OneTenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedagainst: NmapTenable Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Orca Security, Tenable Nessus, Wiz
Three alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMFour alternatives
Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon SpotlightKimi K2Tenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability ManagementHeldTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Qualys VMDR, Wizno first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMTwo alternatives
Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementGLM 4.7 FlashXTenable OneQualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementChangedTenable Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMno first choiceagainst: Cyrisma, Nodeware, Qualys VMDR, RoboScan, Tenable Vulnerability Management, VulScan
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, WizOne alternative
Rapid7 InsightVMThree alternatives
Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMMiniMax M2.5Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementQualys VMDRChangedagainst: OpenVASTenable Vulnerability ManagementMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Managementno first choiceagainst: Nuclei, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete with Spotlight, Qualys VMDR, WizThree alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management, Orca Security, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, WizTwo alternatives
Tenable Vulnerability Management, VulNovaBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:34 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:28 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:42 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:42 | yes | 34 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:48 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:29 | yes | 9 | 61 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:39 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 14 | 116 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:40 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:23 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:41 | yes | 42 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:49 | yes | 17 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:47 | yes | 5 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 14 | 65 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 17 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:23 | no | 0 | 62 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 20 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 31 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:32 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:42 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:42 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:28 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:26 | yes | 25 | 110 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:49 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:41 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:24 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:46 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:48 | yes | 10 | 112 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:31 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:38 | yes | 22 | 102 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:36 | yes | 21 | 79 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:43 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:27 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:21 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:38 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:21 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:43 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:42 | no | 0 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:23 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 14 | 87 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:33 | yes | 5 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 35 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 07:34 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 07:22 | yes | 26 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 07:44 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 07:30 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 07:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 07:37 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 07:29 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 07:27 | yes | 19 | 90 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 07:40 | yes | 30 | 243 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 07:36 | yes | 28 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 07:25 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure read as CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management
Ivanti read as Ivanti Neurons for Vulnerability Management
Nexpose read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Nucleus read as Nucleus Security
Orca read as Orca Security
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (Enterprise TruRisk Platform / VMDR) read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys (Qualys VMDR / Enterprise TruRisk) read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform read as Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM / Exposure Command) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM / Insight Platform) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 Nexpose/InsightVM read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Tenable read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Nessus) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Tenable Vulnerability Management) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Tenable.io / Nessus) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Tenable.io) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Vulnerability Management) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable One / Tenable Vulnerability Management read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable One / Vulnerability Management read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Unresolved, counted raw
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete with Spotlight
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Vulnerability Detection & Patching
Qualys AssetView (legacy)
RoboScan (Roboshadow)
ServiceNow Vulnerability Response
TAC Security
UINAT
VulNova
Vulcan
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.