Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › Vuln management › Small business · September 2026 Edition

Vulnerability management platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “vulnerability management platform”, and as “vulnerability scanning and management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 44 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
59%
Intruder
Clear leader
59Intruder11OpenVAS07ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus23others

59% of first choices, clear leader.

ShowinginAll 136 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessIntruder59%Clear leaderThis pageMid-marketRapid7 InsightVM45%Clear leaderStanding →EnterpriseTenable Vulnerability Management46%Clear leaderStanding →

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Intruder59%2%52endorsed leader
02OpenVAS11%31%35criticized challenger
03ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus7%4%25accepted challenger
04Tenable Vulnerability Management7%48%42criticized challenger
05ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management2%5%19accepted challenger
06Tenable Nessus2%31%26criticized challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Qualys VMDR0%57%44criticized challenger
08Rapid7 InsightVM0%47%36criticized challenger
07Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management0%11%18accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Rapid7 InsightVM vs IntruderRapid7 InsightVM vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusRapid7 InsightVM vs OpenVAS
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementRapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable NessusRapid7 InsightVM vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusIntruder vs OpenVASIntruder vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruder vs Tenable NessusIntruder vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs OpenVASManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Tenable NessusManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS vs Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS vs Tenable NessusOpenVAS vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Nessus vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

One product takes 59% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Five products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Eight of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Qualys VMDR
57%
25 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following vulnerability management platforms due to issues like poor support, high costs” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Rapid7 InsightVM
47%
17 of 36 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade Suites (Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7)... Why to avoid: These platforms are designed for massive enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Tenable Vulnerability Management
48%
20 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Enterprise-Grade Suites (Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7)... Why to avoid: These platforms are designed for massive enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
OpenVAS
31%
11 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Open-source scanners alone (OpenVAS without management) | No dedicated support, high configuration/maintenance burden” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 884 links across 204 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

upguard.com
vendor site · UpGuard46 answers · 46 citations · 11 models
axis-intelligence.com
45 answers · 45 citations · 9 models
techrepublic.com
29 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
orca.security
vendor site · Orca28 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
riskwatch.com
vendor site · RiskWatch26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
expertinsights.com
23 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
g2.com
vendor site · G220 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
pdq.com
vendor site · PDQ19 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vicarius.io
vendor site · Vicarius18 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
reddit.com
17 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
intruder.io
vendor site · Intruder16 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
beaglesecurity.com
vendor site · Beagle Security14 answers · 23 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

upguard.com/blog/top-vendor-vulnerability-tools
46 answers · 11 models
axis-intelligence.com/best-vulnerability-management-tools-tested
45 answers · 9 models
techrepublic.com/article/top-vulnerability-management-tools
29 answers · 8 models
orca.security/resources/blog/best-vulnerability-management-tools
27 answers · 11 models
riskwatch.com/vulnerability-management-software
26 answers · 9 models
expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-vulnerability-management-sol…
21 answers · 8 models
pdq.com/blog/best-vulnerability-management-tools
19 answers · 8 models
blueheadline.com/cybersecurity/best-vulnerability-scanners-small-business
14 answers · 9 models
vicarius.io/articles/6-best-consolidated-vulnerability-management-platforms…
13 answers · 7 models
intruder.io/pricing
12 answers · 6 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platform”, “vulnerability management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Intruder intruder.io59%29127,1008,55749,56243
OpenVAS openvas.org11%713,6002293,099
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus 7%		7%498,100675
Tenable tenable.com
Tenable Vulnerability Management 7%		7%15427,1001,194187,567 company$9,764621
ESET eset.com
ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management 2%		2%1518,1001,812637,959 company$4,39775
Action1 action1.com2%2558,1008718,854$3,80148
Tenable parent site
Tenable Nessus 2%, Tenable Vulnerability Management / Nessus 0%		2%6627,1001,194
Wazuh wazuh.com2%1189,9004467,2143
Aikido aikido.dev
Aikido Security 2%		2%3262,400516,442 company$936120
Hive Pro hivepro.com2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (orca.security, reddit.com). The first result for “best vulnerability management platform” is surecloud.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vulnerability scanning and management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top vulnerability management platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vulnerability management platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a vulnerability management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which vulnerability management platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldIntruder
Three alternativesCyrisma, Orca Security, Rapid7 InsightVM
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Two alternativesNuclei, OpenVAS
against: DefectDojono first choiceagainst: CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Nuclei, OpenVAS, Prisma Cloud, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tanium, Tenable Vulnerability Management
GPT-5.4 miniTenable Vulnerability Management
Four alternativesAikido Security, Intruder, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementHeld
Four alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus
against: ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager PlusTenable Vulnerability Management / Nessus
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM
against: OpenVASOpenVAS
One alternativeTenable Nessus
against: Qualys VMDRno first choiceagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Gemini 3.5 FlashAikido Security
Three alternativesAction1, Intruder, Vicarius vRx
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruderChanged
Four alternativesAstra Security, Detectify, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Three alternativesAction1, Cyrisma, DefectDojo
against: Tenable NessusIntruder, Wazuh
Three alternativesDefectDojo, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OpenVAS
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementAction1
Four alternativesAikido Security, Automox, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Vicarius vRx
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessusagainst: OpenVAS, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable One, Wiz
Perplexity SonarIntruder
Four alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
IntruderHeld
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Three alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, PDQ, Vicarius vRx
against: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruder
Three alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OpenVAS
no first choiceagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Grok 4.20Intruder
Two alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Tenable Nessus
IntruderHeld
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, PDQ Connect, Syxsense
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS
Two alternativesIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
against: ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruder
Four alternativesMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: ConnectSecure, Cyrisma, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Mistral SmallIntruder
One alternativeRapid7 InsightVM
IntruderHeld
Two alternativesMalwarebytes, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder
Four alternativesAmazon Inspector, OpenVAS, Snyk, Trivy
Intruderno first choiceagainst: ConnectSecure, Cyrisma, Nodeware, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashIntruder
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Rapid7 InsightVM, Syxsense
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruderHeld
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDRIntruder
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, NinjaOne, OpenVAS, Wazuh
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS, Qualys Community Edition
Three alternativesIntruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, OWASP ZAP
no first choice
Three alternativesCrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, Wiz
against: Microsoft Defender for Cloud with Sentinel, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, ServiceNow Vuln Management, Tenable Vulnerability Management, Wazuh
Llama 4 MaverickIntruder
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Exposure Management, Orca Security, Rapid7 InsightVM
IntruderHeld
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus
Intruder
One alternativeOrca Security
Intruderno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashIntruder
Three alternativesQualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability ManagementChanged
Three alternativesBitSentry, Drata, Vanta
Intruder
Two alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder
Two alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, OpenVAS
no first choice
Two alternativesBreachRadar, Defer.ai
against: Tenable Nessusagainst: Cyrisma, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Nikto, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, RiskWatch, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Kimi K2Intruder, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Two alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Syxsense
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruderChanged
One alternativeTenable Nessus
Intruder
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDRManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
One alternativeOpenVAS
against: Intruder, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVMIntruder
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability Management
against: ConnectSecure, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Tanium, Tenable Vulnerability Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXIntruder
Two alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
against: Qualys VMDR, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementIntruderHeld
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Malwarebytes, Orca Security
against: Tenable NessusTenable Vulnerability Management
Three alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Intruder, PDQ Deploy & Inventory
ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, OpenVAS
Five alternativesAction1, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, OWASP ZAP, Trivy
Intruder
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Orca Security, Syxsense
against: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: OpenVAS, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management
MiniMax M2.5Hive Pro, Intruder
One alternativeTenable Vulnerability Management
IntruderChanged
Two alternativesMalwarebytes, ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Intruder
Four alternativesESET Vulnerability & Patch Management, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, OpenVAS, Tenable Vulnerability Management
OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
Three alternativesManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
no first choiceagainst: Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:22no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:32yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:35yes1721 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:22yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:26yes4120 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:47yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:41yes1315 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:25yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:42yes523 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:48yes846 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:42yes11213 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:41yes514 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:39no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:30no05 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:43yes918 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:26yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:30yes179 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:38yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:29yes1212 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:44yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:34no040 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:33yes2085 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:30yes824 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:35yes1048 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:21yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:23yes410 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:46yes2627 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:38yes2011 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:21yes3018 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:43yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:21yes1419 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:37yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:42yes1048 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:39yes1284 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:25yes25143 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:40yes820 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:47yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:29yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:29yes1821 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:22yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:42yes4216 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:40yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:33yes2017 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:21yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:26yes1040 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:23yes2555 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:22yes1230 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:24no08 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:27no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:45no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:43yes1527 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:22yes208 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:25yes1710 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:44no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:34yes1820 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:48yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:34no037 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:32yes1021 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:29yes13113 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:48no045 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 07:26yes169 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 07:33yes59 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 07:22yes727 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 07:34yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 07:30yes3918 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 07:28yes67 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 07:39yes2230 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 07:24yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 07:44yes1478 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 07:26yes2937 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 07:50yes27118 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 07:24yes2042 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ESET read as ESET Vulnerability & Patch Management
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus
Orca read as Orca Security
Qualys read as Qualys VMDR
Qualys TruRisk Platform read as Qualys VMDR
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Rapid7 (InsightVM) read as Rapid7 InsightVM
Tenable read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus Enterprise/Tenable.io) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus Professional / Tenable Vulnerability Management) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus/Tenable One) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Nessus/Tenableio) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (Tenable One / Nessus) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable (VMDR) read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Pro read as Tenable Vulnerability Management
Vicarius read as Vicarius vRx
Vicarius (vRx) read as Vicarius vRx
Unresolved, counted raw
BitSentry
BreachRadar
Defer.ai
Microsoft Defender for Cloud with Sentinel
Qualys Free Scanner
ServiceNow Vuln Management
ShadowSecurityScanner
Xylus
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Also in security operations

The other categories of this function, with the leader in each.
← Threat intelAI IT agents →