September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › DLP › Small business · September 2026 Edition

Data loss prevention for small business buyers

Asked as “data loss prevention platform”, and as “DLP tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · CurrentWare 20%
35Microsoft Purview DLP20CurrentWare13Safetica ONE31others

35% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Microsoft Purview DLP35%9%53endorsed leader
02CurrentWare20%2%43accepted challenger
03Safetica ONE13%0%45accepted challenger
04Nightfall AI11%2%45accepted challenger
05Google Workspace DLP Lab in the set6%10%10accepted challenger
06Netwrix Endpoint Protector2%9%44accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
08Trellix DLP0%100%10criticized challenger
10Symantec Data Loss Prevention0%96%26criticized challenger
09Forcepoint DLP0%95%21criticized challenger
07miniOrange DLP0%0%11accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Workspace DLP is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other eleven models two times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
S03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Microsoft Purview DLP35%
02CurrentWare20%
03Safetica ONE13%
04Nightfall AI11%
05Google Workspace DLP6%
06Netwrix Endpoint Protector2%
07miniOrange DLP0%
08Trellix DLP0%
09Forcepoint DLP0%
10Symantec Data Loss Prevention0%

What they warned about

One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention
96%
25 of 26 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 19 hard negative
“Heavy enterprise DLP suites (like Broadcom/Symantec or Forcepoint) are too expensive and require a dedicated team of security analysts to manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Forcepoint DLP
95%
20 of 21 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 15 hard negative
“Heavy enterprise DLP suites (like Broadcom/Symantec or Forcepoint) are too expensive and require a dedicated team of security analysts to manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Trellix DLP
100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“Traditional enterprise DLP platforms (like Symantec, Forcepoint, or Trellix) are the wrong choice for a company of your size.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP
86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Some DLP solutions like Proofpoint and Symantec are expensive, have a steep learning curve, and are resource-intensive to deploy” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1016 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · CurrentWare56 answers · 80 citations · 11 models
41 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · miniOrange35 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · UnderDefense30 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Forcepoint25 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Kickidler23 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Consilien23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Nightfall21 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 26 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Purview DLP 35%
35%2152,240,000403,136
CurrentWare currentware.com
CurrentWare 20%, CurrentWare AccessPatrol 2%
22%29210315,1938
Safetica ONE safetica.com13%885154
Nightfall nightfall.ai
Nightfall AI 11%
11%1211,0003843,377 company$23,73026
Google Workspace workspace.google.com
Google Workspace DLP 6%
6%17368,0007,42240,583,075$2,344
Netwrix Endpoint Protector netwrix.com2%681101104,208$3,789120
Kickidler DLP kickidler.com2%41005,3332
Strac strac.io2%813,600266,51813
Box Shield2%
SentinelOne sentinelone.com2%1933,1001,675446,702$78022

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forcepoint.com, gartner.com, reddit.com, underdefense.com). The first result for “best data loss prevention platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DLP tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top data loss prevention platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a data loss prevention platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data loss prevention platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Kickidler DLP, Safetica ONE
Two alternativesDigital Guardian Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP
no first choiceChangedMicrosoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesKickidler DLP, Safetica ONE, Strac
against: Teramind DLP
CurrentWare, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Two alternativesMicrosoft Purview DLP, MyDLP
no first choiceagainst: Check Point DLP, Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesDigital Guardian, Fortra DLP, Google Workspace DLP
Microsoft Purview DLPHeld
One alternativeGoogle Workspace DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP
Microsoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesCloudflare Integrated DLP, Netskope DLP, Palo Alto Networks Prisma for Business
Microsoft Purview DLP
One alternativeGoogle Workspace DLP
against: Netskope DLP
no first choiceagainst: Cisco Umbrella DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Gemini 3.5 FlashNightfall AI, Strac
Three alternativesGoogle Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
against: Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Three alternativesCoro, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
against: Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Coro
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
against: Google Workspace Native DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
ManageEngine Endpoint DLP Plus, Microsoft Purview DLP
Two alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP
Five alternativesCyberhaven, Kitecyber, Metomic, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Prisma Cloud, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Zscaler Internet Access
Perplexity SonarSafetica ONE
Four alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, miniOrange DLP
CurrentWare, Safetica ONEChanged
Two alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI
Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
against: Microsoft Purview DLP
Box Shield, Nightfall AI
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE
against: Microsoft Purview DLP
no first choiceagainst: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Grok 4.20Safetica ONE
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
CurrentWareChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
against: Netwrix Endpoint Protector
CurrentWare
Four alternativesKickidler DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
CurrentWare
One alternativeMicrosoft Purview DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Microsoft Purview DLP
Four alternativesCurrentWare, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLP
against: Cyberhaven
against: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Mistral SmallCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP
Two alternativesNightfall AI, Safetica ONE
CurrentWareChanged
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
CurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
CurrentWare
Three alternativesKickidler DLP, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
no first choiceagainst: Fortra DLP, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
One alternativeCurrentWare
against: Nightfall AI
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Four alternativesCurrentWare, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Microsoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesBox Shield, CurrentWare, Nightfall AI
Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP
Two alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Strac
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
against: Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Llama 4 MaverickCurrentWare
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Safetica ONEChanged
Six alternativesKickidler DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix 1Secure, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Teramind DLP, miniOrange DLP
CurrentWare
Four alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLP
CurrentWare
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
no first choiceagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Qwen 3.7 FlashNightfall AI
Two alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP
against: Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Two alternativesSentinelOne, Zscaler Internet Access
against: McAfee DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Nightfall AI
Two alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE
against: CurrentWare
CurrentWare AccessPatrol
Two alternativesMicrosoft Purview DLP, Safetica ONE
against: Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
SentinelOne, Sophos Intercept X
Five alternativesCrowdStrike, Ironclad, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Tessian, Trend Micro
against: Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Varonis Data Security Platform, Veritas
against: Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Kimi K2Nightfall AI
Four alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Teramind DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
CurrentWare
Five alternativesMicrosoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, miniOrange DLP
Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Three alternativesBox Shield, CurrentWare, ManageEngine Device Control Plus
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
no first choice
Five alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, Strac
against: Digital Guardian, Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
GLM 4.7 FlashXSafetica ONE
Three alternativesCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Nightfall AI
Microsoft Purview DLPChanged
Five alternativesCurrentWare, ManageEngine Device Control Plus, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
Microsoft Purview DLP
Six alternativesCurrentWare, Forcepoint ONE, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLP
Microsoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesCurrentWare AccessPatrol, ManageEngine Device Control Plus, Nightfall AI
against: MyDLP
no first choiceagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
MiniMax M2.5CurrentWare
Three alternativesNetwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE
CurrentWare, Nightfall AIChanged
One alternativeNetwrix Endpoint Protector
Nightfall AI
Four alternativesBox Shield, CurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Google Workspace DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP
Three alternativesManageEngine DataSecurity Plus, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, SolarWinds DLP
against: MyDLP, OpenDLP
no first choice
Five alternativesCurrentWare, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLP
against: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:12yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:26yes37 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:14yes2321 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:32yes207 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:51yes3116 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 11:47yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:33yes2329 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:10yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:02yes1477 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 14:13yes1831 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:15yes22223 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:42yes520 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 12:32no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:23yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:08yes2325 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:19yes206 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:40yes2912 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:20yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:42yes1618 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:59yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:52no040 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 14:05yes816 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:08yes22114 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:24yes563 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:13yes1412 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:39yes79 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:43yes1924 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:27yes208 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:21yes2416 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:02yes1413 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:54yes2132 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:37yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:18yes945 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:29yes841 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:52yes2378 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:42yes2258 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:57yes910 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:37yes37 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 12:58yes1418 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:35yes206 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:49yes4117 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:10yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:23yes1714 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 12:39yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:23yes1464 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:38yes1130 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:07yes31350 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 14:03yes523 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:12no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 10:22no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:27yes1425 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:23yes209 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:57yes1814 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:14no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 13:06yes2025 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:26yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:29no043 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 10:30yes1430 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 14:01yes1188 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:09yes1032 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:03yes1610 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 14:13yes48 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 11:16yes1725 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 10:26yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:58yes3518 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:36yes107 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:47yes3019 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:46yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:24yes18142 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:31yes1730 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:39yes3476 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:16yes2349 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Broadcom (Symantec DLP) read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Broadcom/Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Check Point read as Check Point DLP
Forcepoint read as Forcepoint DLP
Google Workspace read as Google Workspace DLP
Google Workspace Enterprise read as Google Workspace DLP
Kickidler read as Kickidler DLP
M365 E5 read as Microsoft Purview DLP
McAfee Endpoint DLP read as McAfee DLP
McAfee Enterprise read as McAfee DLP
Microsoft 365 read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft 365 Business Premium read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview (Business Premium Add-on) read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview (Microsoft 365 DLP) read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview Suite read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Netskope read as Netskope DLP
Netwrix read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Nightfall read as Nightfall AI
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Enterprise DLP
Safetica read as Safetica ONE
Safetica (Standard or NXT) read as Safetica ONE
Safetica DLP read as Safetica ONE
Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Symantec/Broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Teramind read as Teramind DLP
Trellix read as Trellix DLP
Trellix / McAfee DLP read as Trellix DLP
Trellix Data Loss Prevention (formerly McAfee DLP) read as Trellix DLP
Varonis read as Varonis Data Security Platform
Zscaler read as Zscaler Internet Access
miniOrange read as miniOrange DLP
Unresolved, counted raw
Cisco Umbrella DLP
Cloudflare Integrated DLP
Google Workspace Native DLP
Ironclad
Palo Alto Networks Prisma for Business
SolarWinds DLP
Tenable Qualys
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Cyber risk quantDSPM →