Data loss prevention
Asked as “data loss prevention platform”, and as “DLP tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · CurrentWare 18%
39Microsoft Purview DLP18CurrentWare16Safetica ONE27others
39% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Purview DLP vs CyberhavenMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Forcepoint DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs miniOrange DLPMicrosoft Purview DLP vs Netskope DLPCurrentWare vs Safetica ONECurrentWare vs Nightfall AICurrentWare vs CyberhavenCurrentWare vs Forcepoint DLPCurrentWare vs miniOrange DLPCurrentWare vs Netskope DLPSafetica ONE vs Nightfall AISafetica ONE vs CyberhavenSafetica ONE vs Forcepoint DLPSafetica ONE vs miniOrange DLPSafetica ONE vs Netskope DLPNightfall AI vs CyberhavenNightfall AI vs Forcepoint DLPNightfall AI vs miniOrange DLPNightfall AI vs Netskope DLPCyberhaven vs Forcepoint DLPCyberhaven vs miniOrange DLPCyberhaven vs Netskope DLPForcepoint DLP vs miniOrange DLPForcepoint DLP vs Netskope DLPminiOrange DLP vs Netskope DLP
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02S03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Microsoft Purview DLP39%
Microsoft Purview DLP39%02CurrentWare18%
CurrentWare18%03Safetica ONE16%
04Nightfall AI8%
Nightfall AI8%05Cyberhaven4%
Cyberhaven4%06Forcepoint DLP4%
Forcepoint DLP4%07miniOrange DLP4%
miniOrange DLP4%08Netskope DLP2%
Netskope DLP2%09Zscaler Internet Access0%
Zscaler Internet Access0%10Proofpoint Enterprise DLP0%
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP0%11Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%
Netwrix Endpoint Protector0%12Strac0%
Strac0%13Varonis Data Security Platform0%
Varonis Data Security Platform0%14Trellix DLP0%
Trellix DLP0%15Symantec Data Loss Prevention0%
Symantec Data Loss Prevention0%What they warned about
Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention71%
25 of 35 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“They may be "avoid" choices for organizations lacking dedicated, senior security staff.... frequently cited for high false-positive rates and complex policy management” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Forcepoint DLP31%
15 of 49 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Legacy enterprise DLP platforms (such as Broadcom/Symantec, Forcepoint, or Trellix) are often a poor fit for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
Fortra DLP62%
5 of 8 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Known as a "heavy" agent that can break compatibility with other software if not meticulously managed.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
McAfee DLP86%
6 of 7 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid McAfee/Trellix DLP if you can't afford constant performance tuning and false positive management.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 910 links across 189 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
45 answers · 64 citations · 12 models
vendor site · CurrentWare37 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · miniOrange33 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Strac27 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Forcepoint24 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · UnderDefense23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Safetica19 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Consilien19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cyberhaven16 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Kitecyber15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 9 models
21 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platform”, “data loss prevention platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Purview DLP 39% | 39% | 215 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| CurrentWare currentware.com | 18% | 29 | 210 | 3 | 15,193 | 8 | ||
| Safetica ONE safetica.com | 16% | 88 | 515 | 4 | ||||
| Nightfall nightfall.ai Nightfall AI 8% | 8% | 121 | 1,000 | 38 | 43,377 company | $23,730 | 26 | |
| Cyberhaven cyberhaven.com | 4% | 82 | 2,900 | 54 | 13,999 | 22 | ||
| Forcepoint forcepoint.com Forcepoint DLP 4% | 4% | 169 | 4,400 | 244 | 25,465 company | 52 | 2 | |
| miniOrange DLP miniorange.com | 4% | 6 | 10 | 0 | 48,290 | 17 | ||
| Netskope netskope.com Netskope DLP 2% | 2% | 76 | 18,100 | 830 | 42,119 company | 27 | ||
| Mimecast mimecast.com | 2% | 7 | 148,929 | 21 | ||||
| Lookout lookout.com | 2% | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forcepoint.com, gartner.com, strac.io, underdefense.com). The first result for “best data loss prevention platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DLP tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top data loss prevention platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best data loss prevention platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a data loss prevention platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which data loss prevention platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Safetica ONEno first choiceChangedStracCurrentWareagainst: OpenDLPno first choiceagainst: DeviceLock, GTB, MyDLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, OpenDLP, Sophos, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro, Websense
Two alternatives
Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPEight alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Mimecast Incydr, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Teramind DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessTwo alternatives
Netskope DLP, Teramind DLPGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPHeldMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Symantec Data Loss Preventionno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLPFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessOne alternative
Fortra DLPGemini 3.5 FlashCyberhaven, Nightfall AIagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLPNightfall AIChangedagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionno first choiceagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionSafetica ONEagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionCyberhavenagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Two alternatives
Coro, Safetica ONEThree alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONEFive alternatives
Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPFour alternatives
Google Workspace DLP, ManageEngine Endpoint DLP Plus, Microsoft Purview DLP, Teramind DLPFour alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEPerplexity SonarSafetica ONEMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedno first choiceCurrentWare, Safetica ONEagainst: Kickidler DLPno first choiceagainst: Check Point DLP, Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, MyDLP, OpenDLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Zscaler Internet Access
Four alternatives
CurrentWare, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorFour alternatives
CurrentWare, Forcepoint DLP, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEGrok 4.20Safetica ONEagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionSafetica ONEHeldagainst: Forcepoint DLPno first choiceCurrentWareagainst: Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONE, Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Elastic, OpenDLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, McAfee DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Three alternatives
CurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorThree alternatives
CurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTwo alternatives
Kickidler DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPFive alternatives
Code42, Forcepoint DLP, Nightfall AI, Tessian, Zscaler Internet AccessMistral SmallCurrentWareCurrentWare, miniOrange DLPChangedStracagainst: Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionNightfall AIno first choiceagainst: Symantec Data Loss Preventionnothing named
Two alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPThree alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netwrix Endpoint ProtectorTwo alternatives
Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLPSix alternatives
Box Shield, CurrentWare, Google Cloud DLP, MyDLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Safetica ONEDeepSeek V4 FlashForcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Box Shield, OpenDLPno first choiceagainst: McAfee DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Forcepoint DLP, McAfee DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Two alternatives
Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEThree alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONENine alternatives
Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Strac, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessThree alternatives
CurrentWare, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Mimecast, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, StracLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Purview DLPminiOrange DLPChangedno first choiceCurrentWareno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CurrentWare, Kitecyber Data Shield, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEOne alternative
miniOrange DLPQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPHeldMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: McAfee DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionLookout, Mimecast, Netskope DLPagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Symantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview Information Protection, Netskope DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP
Four alternatives
Digital Guardian, Digitale, Netskope DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessFour alternatives
Digital Guardian, Google Chronicle, Netskope DLP, Varonis Data Security PlatformFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, McAfee (Treleken) Total Data Protection, Netskope Security Cloud, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Zscaler Internet AccessThree alternatives
Box Shield, CurrentWare, Nightfall AIThree alternatives
CrowdStrike, Microsoft Purview DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessKimi K2Nightfall AIMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: MyDLP Community Edition, OpenDLPMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: Symantec Data Loss Preventionagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Fortra DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Four alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Netskope DLP, Teramind DLPThree alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, GTB, Safetica ONESeven alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Nightfall AI, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Trellix DLP, Zscaler Internet AccessTwo alternatives
CurrentWare, Safetica ONEThree alternatives
Cyberhaven, Forcepoint DLP, Safetica ONEGLM 4.7 FlashXCurrentWare, Microsoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedagainst: Symantec Data Loss PreventionMicrosoft Purview DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: Digital Guardian, ManageEngine, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Five alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE, miniOrange DLPOne alternative
Forcepoint DLPFive alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONE, Trellix DLPSix alternatives
CurrentWare, MyDLP, Nightfall AI, OpenDLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Safetica ONEMiniMax M2.5CurrentWare, Safetica ONEagainst: Forcepoint DLPMicrosoft Purview DLPChangedMicrosoft Purview DLPagainst: McAfee DLPCurrentWareForcepoint DLP, Safetica ONEagainst: Forcepoint DLP, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Two alternatives
GTB Technologies DLP, Microsoft Purview DLPTwo alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, miniOrange DLPFour alternatives
Forcepoint DLP, Netskope DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLP, Symantec Data Loss PreventionThree alternatives
Netwrix Endpoint Protector, Nightfall AI, Safetica ONEThree alternatives
Cyberhaven, Microsoft Purview DLP, Proofpoint Enterprise DLPBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 10:59 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:07 | yes | 27 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 14:10 | yes | 34 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:35 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:33 | yes | 8 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 12:26 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:12 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:54 | yes | 12 | 101 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 12:52 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:05 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:32 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:00 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:36 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:00 | yes | 30 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:46 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:16 | yes | 7 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:58 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:36 | yes | 9 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:40 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 11:29 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:12 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:59 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:43 | yes | 29 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:00 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 13:11 | yes | 27 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:53 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:52 | yes | 14 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:13 | yes | 24 | 158 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:27 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:46 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 12:39 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:09 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:11 | yes | 40 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 12 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 10:56 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:40 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:03 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:08 | yes | 26 | 307 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:37 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:58 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:36 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:47 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 12:01 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:19 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:37 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:50 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:19 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:23 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 14 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:28 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 12:10 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:36 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:46 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:58 | yes | 24 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:44 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:25 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 24 | 122 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 13:59 | yes | 25 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 32 | 254 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 14:08 | yes | 22 | 62 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Broadcom (Symantec) read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Broadcom/Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Code42 Incydr read as Mimecast Incydr
Forcepoint read as Forcepoint DLP
Fortra read as Fortra DLP
Fortra/Digital Guardian read as Fortra DLP
Kickidler read as Kickidler DLP
McAfee read as McAfee DLP
Microsoft Purview read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Microsoft Purview (M365 DLP) read as Microsoft Purview DLP
Miniorange read as miniOrange DLP
Netskope read as Netskope DLP
Netwrix read as Netwrix Endpoint Protector
Nightfall read as Nightfall AI
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Palo Alto Networks DLP read as Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Enterprise DLP
Safetica read as Safetica ONE
Symantec read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Symantec (Broadcom) read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Symantec/Broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Teramind read as Teramind DLP
Trellix read as Trellix DLP
Trellix (McAfee) DLP read as Trellix DLP
Trellix/McAfee DLP read as Trellix DLP
Varonis read as Varonis Data Security Platform
Zscaler read as Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler (Zero Trust Exchange) read as Zscaler Internet Access
Zscaler DLP read as Zscaler Internet Access
miniOrange read as miniOrange DLP
symantec/broadcom read as Symantec Data Loss Prevention
Unresolved, counted raw
DeviceLock
Digitale
Falcongaze SecureTower
HiveCode
Kitecyber Data Shield
Lookout DLP
Marketing Case Study
McAfee (Treleken) Total Data Protection
MyDLP Community Edition
Netskope Security Cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.