Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › SIEM · September 2026 Edition

SIEM platforms

Asked as “SIEM platform”, and as “security information and event management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Microsoft Sentinel
Clear leader
41Microsoft Sentinel22Rapid7 InsightIDR18Wazuh18others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

ShowinginAll 136 categories in the September 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessBlumira28%ContestedStanding →Mid-marketMicrosoft Sentinel41%Clear leaderThis pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Sentinel30%ContestedStanding →

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Microsoft Sentinel41%12%57endorsed leader
02Rapid7 InsightIDR22%4%28accepted challenger
03Wazuh18%7%15accepted challenger
04Elastic Security6%0%32accepted challenger
05ManageEngine Log3604%6%16accepted challenger
06Blumira4%0%12accepted challenger
07LogRhythm2%34%29criticized challenger
Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Securonix Unified Defense SIEM0%53%15criticized challenger
15Splunk Enterprise Security0%50%48criticized challenger
13IBM QRadar0%37%30criticized challenger
12Graylog Security0%30%10criticized challenger
08Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM0%16%19accepted challenger
11Exabeam0%15%13accepted challenger
09Google Security Operations Lab in the set0%8%12accepted challenger
10Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM0%8%13accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models zero times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to head
Microsoft Sentinel vs Rapid7 InsightIDRMicrosoft Sentinel vs WazuhMicrosoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Microsoft Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360Microsoft Sentinel vs BlumiraMicrosoft Sentinel vs LogRhythmRapid7 InsightIDR vs WazuhRapid7 InsightIDR vs Elastic SecurityRapid7 InsightIDR vs ManageEngine Log360Rapid7 InsightIDR vs BlumiraRapid7 InsightIDR vs LogRhythmWazuh vs Elastic SecurityWazuh vs ManageEngine Log360Wazuh vs BlumiraWazuh vs LogRhythmElastic Security vs ManageEngine Log360Elastic Security vs BlumiraElastic Security vs LogRhythmManageEngine Log360 vs BlumiraManageEngine Log360 vs LogRhythmBlumira vs LogRhythm

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
G12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Sentinel41%
02Rapid7 InsightIDR22%
03Wazuh18%
04Elastic Security6%
05ManageEngine Log3604%
06Blumira4%
07LogRhythm2%
08Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM0%
09Google Security Operations0%
10Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM0%
11Exabeam0%
12Graylog Security0%
13IBM QRadar0%
14Securonix Unified Defense SIEM0%
15Splunk Enterprise Security0%

What they warned about

Three of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk Enterprise Security
50%
24 of 48 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid Splunk Enterprise Security at this stage unless you have a large budget ... it's overkill and cost-prohibitive” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
LogRhythm
34%
10 of 29 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“user feedback in the results is explicitly negative, with calls to avoid it if you care about "mental sanity and money."” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
53%
8 of 15 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 7 hard negative
“Multiple users have expressed dissatisfaction with Securonix, citing issues such as poor support, deactivation of policies without warning, and overall poor performance.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
IBM QRadar
37%
11 of 30 labels negative · 8 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“the cloud and related services are no longer viable options for new deployments or expansions” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

63 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 832 links across 204 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

underdefense.com
vendor site · UnderDefense37 answers · 48 citations · 11 models
paloaltonetworks.com
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks35 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
exabeam.com
vendor site · Exabeam25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
reddit.com
22 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
cipherssecurity.com
20 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
gartner.com
19 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
expertinsights.com
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
xoomar.com
16 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
manageengine.com
vendor site · ManageEngine16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
subrosacyber.com
15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
exelegent.com
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
comparitech.com
12 answers · 16 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/siem-tools-comparison
32 answers · 11 models
underdefense.com/blog/siem-solutions-comparison
30 answers · 11 models
gartner.com/reviews/market/security-information-event-management
18 answers · 10 models
expertinsights.com/security-operations/the-top-siem-solutions
17 answers · 8 models
cipherssecurity.com/best-siem-tools-mid-size-enterprises-2026
15 answers · 8 models
exelegent.com/best-siem-tools-for-mid-market-organizations
14 answers · 8 models
subrosacyber.com/blog/best-siem-reddit
13 answers · 6 models
exabeam.com/explainers/siem-tools/siem-buyers-guide
12 answers · 7 models
manageengine.com/log-management/top-siem-tools.html
12 answers · 7 models
cipherssecurity.com/best-siem-tools-in-2026-compared
10 answers · 5 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best siem platform”, “siem platform”, “siem platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 41%		41%3712,240,000403,136
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightIDR 22%		22%8814,800798
Wazuh wazuh.com18%1189,9004467,2143
Elastic elastic.co
Elastic Security 6%		6%12474,00034,672208,306 company105
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Log360 4%		4%1398,100675
Blumira blumira.com4%1081,300128,06010
Huntress huntress.com
Huntress Managed SIEM 2%		2%2433,1004,338352,368 company$15,522120
Exabeam exabeam.com
LogRhythm 2%, Exabeam 0%		2%1101,9008266,72305
Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM sumologic.com0%4640182,749$4,12355
Google Security Operations google.dev0%793905881,346109

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (exabeam.com, gartner.com, manageengine.com, reddit.com, underdefense.com). The first result for “best siem platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SIEM platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security information and event management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top SIEM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SIEM platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a SIEM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SIEM platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ManageEngine Log360
Three alternativesBlumira, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Elastic Security, Microsoft SentinelChangedagainst: Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft SentinelWazuh
Three alternativesBlumira, Graylog Security, ManageEngine Log360
no first choiceagainst: Splunk Enterprise Security
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Sentinel
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Four alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
no first choice
Seven alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Elastic Security, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Elastic Security
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashBlumira, Huntress Managed SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightIDR, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
against: IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise SecurityRapid7 InsightIDRChanged
Five alternativesArctic Wolf, Blumira, Datadog Cloud SIEM, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
against: IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft Sentinel
Six alternativesCisco, CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Google Security Operations, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Wazuh
Two alternativesBlumira, Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft Sentinel
Five alternativesBlackpoint Cyber, Blumira, Datadog Cloud SIEM, Expel, Red Canary
against: Exabeam, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Sentinel
One alternativeRapid7 InsightIDR
against: Splunk Enterprise SecurityManageEngine Log360, Microsoft SentinelChanged
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightIDR, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceWazuh
Two alternativesGraylog Security, ManageEngine Log360
against: Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceagainst: Hunters, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Grok 4.20Rapid7 InsightIDR
Five alternativesBlumira, Elastic Security, LogRhythm, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft SentinelChanged
One alternativeRapid7 InsightIDR
against: LogRhythm, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceWazuh
Five alternativesBlumira, Elastic Security, Graylog Security, ManageEngine Log360, Security Onion
against: Microsoft SentinelMicrosoft Sentinel
Six alternativesBlumira, Elastic Security, Huntress Managed SIEM, ManageEngine Log360, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Mistral SmallMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
One alternativeManageEngine Log360
LogRhythm, Microsoft SentinelChanged
Two alternativesElastic Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel
Wazuh
Two alternativesElastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, LogRhythm
against: Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft SentinelChanged
Three alternativesManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Wazuh
against: Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Wazuh
Six alternativesElastic Security, Graylog Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Security Onion, SolarWinds Security Event Manager, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
against: Rapid7 InsightIDRno first choiceagainst: Exabeam, Graylog Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, SolarWinds Security Event Manager, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
One alternativeManageEngine Log360
no first choiceChangedno first choiceagainst: Splunk Enterprise SecurityElastic Security
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Datadog Cloud SIEM, Rapid7 InsightIDR
no first choiceagainst: LogRhythm, SW, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
One alternativeLogRhythm
against: ManageEngine Log360Rapid7 InsightIDRChanged
Two alternativesLogRhythm, ManageEngine Log360
Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh
Blumira
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Wazuh
Microsoft Sentinel
Two alternativesDatadog Cloud SIEM, Google Security Operations
against: ELK Stack, Graylog Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh
Kimi K2Rapid7 InsightIDR
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel
Rapid7 InsightIDRHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceWazuh
Three alternativesElastic Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Rapid7 InsightIDR
Four alternativesElastic Security, LogRhythm Axon, Microsoft Sentinel, Stellar Cyber Next-Gen SIEM
against: Datadog Cloud SIEM, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenText ArcSight, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Sentinel
Four alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Rapid7 InsightIDR
against: Splunk Enterprise SecurityMicrosoft SentinelHeld
Three alternativesElastic Security, LogRhythm, Rapid7 InsightIDR
against: Datadog Cloud SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choice
Ten alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next\u2011Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Exabeam, Huntress Managed SIEM, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Splunk Enterprise Security
Wazuh
Three alternativesElastic Security, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceagainst: Cisco Kenna Security, Exabeam & LogRhythm, IBM QRadar, OpenText ArcSight, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security, Varonis
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Two alternativesElastic Security, LogRhythm
against: Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAMMicrosoft SentinelChanged
Three alternativesDatadog Cloud SIEM, Elastic Security, LogRhythm
against: Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceWazuh
Two alternativesBlumira, Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceagainst: Graylog Security, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenText ArcSight, Splunk Enterprise Security
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:31yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:05yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:28yes1528 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:48yes205 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:40yes3017 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:09yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:51yes1513 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:43yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:32yes534 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:55yes1533 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:09yes13285 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:39yes528 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:49no06 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:25no02 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:53yes819 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:46yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:01yes3517 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:35yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:16yes913 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:46yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:24yes539 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:42yes1521 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:09yes896 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:08yes528 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:51yes1210 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:05yes410 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:28yes1929 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:53yes207 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:22yes2915 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:16yes712 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:37yes1015 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:54yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:36no044 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:57yes1038 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:14yes1594 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:45yes524 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:40yes99 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:38yes34 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:17yes1722 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:12yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:45yes1810 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:04yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:21yes1012 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:37yes59 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:38yes2166 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 09:12yes1023 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:07yes1572 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:25yes521 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:22no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:08no012 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:57no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:54yes208 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:23yes1711 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:57no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:54yes1925 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:42yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:02no040 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:28yes1429 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 09:07yes13137 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:29yes514 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:58yes177 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:42no07 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:46yes1823 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:30yes208 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:21yes3615 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:29yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 09:01yes3028 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:24yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:39yes1554 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:58yes2940 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:36yes29108 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:02yes527 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ArcSight read as OpenText ArcSight
ArcSight (OpenText) read as OpenText ArcSight
Cortex XSIAM read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud SIEM
Elastic read as Elastic Security
Exabeam Fusion read as Exabeam
Google read as Google Security Operations
Google Chronicle read as Google Security Operations
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle) read as Google Security Operations
Graylog read as Graylog Security
Graylog Open read as Graylog Security
Huntress read as Huntress Managed SIEM
IBM read as IBM QRadar
Microsoft read as Microsoft Sentinel
Securonix read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Splunk read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk (SPL) read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Cloud read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Stellar Cyber read as Stellar Cyber Next-Gen SIEM
Sumo Logic read as Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Unresolved, counted raw
Cisco Kenna Security
CrowdStrike Falcon Next\u2011Gen SIEM
Kaseya SIEM
McAfee Enterprise Security Manager
SW
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Also in security operations

The other categories of this function, with the leader in each.
← Awareness trainingSOAR →