September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › Email security · September 2026 Edition

Email security

Asked as “email security platform”, and as “phishing and email threat protection tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Abnormal AI 12%
32Microsoft Defender for Office 36512Abnormal AI12Proofpoint Email Protection44others

32% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Microsoft Defender for Office 36532%9%47endorsed leader
02Abnormal AI12%4%45accepted challenger
03Proofpoint Email Protection12%12%50accepted challenger
04Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration11%7%28accepted challenger
05IRONSCALES9%0%29accepted challenger
06Mimecast Email Security7%13%45accepted challenger
07Barracuda Email Protection7%6%34accepted challenger
08SpamTitan5%7%15accepted challenger
09Sublime Security2%0%10accepted challenger
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Cisco Secure Email0%27%11criticized challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for Office 36532%
02Abnormal AI12%
03Proofpoint Email Protection12%
04Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration11%
05IRONSCALES9%
06Mimecast Email Security7%
07Barracuda Email Protection7%
08SpamTitan5%
09Sublime Security2%
10Cisco Secure Email0%

What they warned about

Zero of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Mimecast Email Security
13%
6 of 45 labels negative · 6 of 12 models
“it has experienced security breaches in the past, including a certificate compromise... This has led some organizations to approach Mimecast with caution.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
AOL Mail
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Yahoo Mail and AOL Mail are considered to be insecure and should be avoided” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Proofpoint Email Protection
12%
6 of 50 labels negative · 4 of 12 models
“Proofpoint is priced and configured for enterprise environments with significant operational complexity... it just may not be suitable for smaller organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Yahoo Mail
100%
3 of 3 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“Yahoo Mail and AOL Mail are considered to be insecure and should be avoided due to their history of data breaches” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

64 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 948 links across 230 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

47 answers · 53 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Sublime26 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · IRONSCALES22 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Kaseya20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Barracuda19 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Proofpoint17 answers · 25 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Check Point15 answers · 17 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
13 answers · 22 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email security platform”, “email security platform”, “email security platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft Defender parent site
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 32%
32%16618,1003,525
Abnormal abnormal.ai
Abnormal AI 12%
12%1078,10013030,467 company$6120
Proofpoint proofpoint.com
Proofpoint Email Protection 12%
12%16427,1001,488593,092 company$9,336434
Check Point parent site
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration 11%
11%7914,8004,487
IRONSCALES ironscales.com9%661,9002810,997225
Mimecast mimecast.com
Mimecast Email Security 7%
7%13432017148,929 company21
Barracuda barracuda.com
Barracuda Email Protection 7%
7%100201,00010,56164,778 company1164
SpamTitan spamtitan.com5%22590224,190
Sublime Security sublime.security2%232,900276,558262
Google Workspace google.com2%53368,0007,4221,800,358,416$465,9445

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (barracuda.com, gartner.com, ironscales.com, proofpoint.com, reddit.com, sublime.security). The first result for “best email security platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which phishing and email threat protection tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top email security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an email security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Barracuda Email Protection
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
against: Proofpoint Email Protection
IRONSCALESChanged
Two alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Sophos Email
Barracuda Email Protection
Five alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection, Sophos Email
SpamTitan
Two alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365
no first choiceagainst: Proofpoint Email Protection, Salesloft Drift
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Defender for Office 365
One alternativeProofpoint Email Protection
Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email ProtectionChangedno first choice
Seven alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Cisco Secure Email, Darktrace EMAIL, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Three alternativesCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Google Workspace, Proofpoint Email Protection
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Three alternativesIRONSCALES, Sophos Email, Sublime Security
Check Point Harmony Email & CollaborationChanged
One alternativeIRONSCALES
against: Abnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
no first choice
Six alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection, Sublime Security
Sublime Security
Four alternativesCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, IRONSCALES, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SpamTitan
against: Abnormal AI
Abnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Four alternativesIRONSCALES, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection, Sublime Security
against: AOL Mail, Apple iCloud Mail, Cisco Secure Email, Gmail, Google Workspace, Hushmail, Microsoft 365 EOP, Outlook, Skiff Mail, Symantec Email Security.cloud, Trellix, Yahoo
Perplexity SonarMimecast Email Security
One alternativeProofpoint Email Protection
Microsoft Defender for Office 365Changed
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection
no first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Office 365
Two alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, SpamTitan
no first choiceagainst: AOL Mail, Barracuda Email Protection, Gmail, Microsoft, Outlook, Yahoo Mail
Grok 4.20Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection
against: Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email ProtectionChanged
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security
Proofpoint Email Protection
Four alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Proofpoint Email Protection, SpamTitan
no first choice
Six alternativesAbnormal AI, Cloudflare Email Security, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection, Trend Micro Email Security
against: AOL Mail, Appriver, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, FortiMail, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SonicWall, Sophos Email, Yahoo Mail
Mistral SmallBarracuda Email Protection, Proofpoint Email Protection
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security
Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email ProtectionChanged
Four alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Defender for Office 365
no first choiceCheck Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SpamTitan
no first choiceagainst: Barracuda Email Protection, Mimecast Email Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, IRONSCALES
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection
IRONSCALES, Microsoft Defender for Office 365Changed
One alternativeAbnormal AI
Proofpoint Email Protection
Five alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Google Workspace, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Security Gateway, Proofpoint Email Protection, SpamTitan
Abnormal AI
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security
against: Proofpoint Email Protection
against: Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, SpamTitan
Llama 4 MaverickBarracuda Email Protection
Three alternativesIRONSCALES, Proofpoint Email Protection, SpamTitan
TrustmiChanged
One alternativeControlD
no first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Office 365
One alternativeAcronis Cyber Protect
no first choiceagainst: AOL Mail, Gmail, Hotmail, Microsoft Outlook, Yahoo Mail, iCloud Mail
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Office 365
Four alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Proofpoint Email ProtectionChanged
Three alternativesKnowBe4, Red Sift, Vade Secure
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Five alternativesAbnormal AI, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, IRONSCALES, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SpamTitan
Two alternativesProofpoint Email Protection, Sophos Email
Abnormal AI
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Proofpoint Email Protection, Valimail
against: Mimecast Email Security
against: McAfee Total Protection, Windows Defender standalone
Kimi K2Abnormal AI, IRONSCALES
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security
against: Proofpoint Email Protection
Abnormal AI, Barracuda Email ProtectionChanged
Two alternativesKnowBe4, Mimecast Email Security
Abnormal AI, IRONSCALES, Material Securityagainst: Microsoft Defender for Office 365Microsoft Defender for Office 365, SpamTitan
Two alternativesProofpoint Email Protection, Trustifi
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Three alternativesAbnormal AI, Google Workspace, Material Security
against: Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Cisco Secure Email, Libraesva Email Security Gateway, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
GLM 4.7 FlashXMimecast Email Security
Four alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection, Egress, IRONSCALES
Microsoft Defender for Office 365Changed
Three alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Abnormal AI
Five alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Egress, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Proofpoint Email Protection
Google Workspace, Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Three alternativesProofpoint Email Protection, Sophos Email, SpamTitan
no first choiceagainst: Bitdefender Email Security, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Cisco Secure Email, Libraesva Email Security Gateway, Mimecast Email Security
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Mimecast Email Security
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, IRONSCALESChanged
Two alternativesAbnormal AI, Barracuda Email Protection
Proofpoint Email Protection
Four alternativesBarracuda Email Protection, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Mimecast Email Security, Sublime Security
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Four alternativesCloudflare Email Security, ESET Mail Security, Google Workspace, SpamTitan
no first choiceagainst: Darktrace EMAIL, Microsoft
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:20yes99 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 11:46yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:39yes1728 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 14:14yes206 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:22yes2412 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:28yes87 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:21yes2726 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 13:11yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 11:13yes840 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:18yes2063 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 10:38yes4180 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:19yes517 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:02yes1613 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:25yes26 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:02yes1623 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 11:58yes204 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 13:45yes2010 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:58yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 10:40yes1015 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:55yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 10:43yes1042 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:45yes1022 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 12:55yes1016 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:22yes834 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 13:44yes1410 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:03yes711 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:14yes2223 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:39yes1811 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 11:30yes2913 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 10:29yes910 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:51yes1831 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 11:59yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 13:15yes521 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:57yes924 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:07yes29130 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 10:01yes1028 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 10:46yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 13:06no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 10:51yes1920 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:27yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 12:24yes3715 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:24yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:37yes813 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 10:04yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:03yes1054 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 11:40yes1535 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 11:17yes13179 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 13:35no011 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 11:01no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:16no011 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:18yes1125 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 12:26yes209 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 10:03yes2414 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 12:24no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 11:12yes1525 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 14:06yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:40no043 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 13:38yes1072 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 13:10yes14101 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:37yes510 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 14:03yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 12:31no06 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 13:34yes1724 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 13:59yes206 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:53yes4017 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 13:44yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 12:02yes2942 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 09:29yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 12:27no042 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 12:47yes3047 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 14:04yes3138 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 11:51yes1429 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AOL read as AOL Mail
Abnormal read as Abnormal AI
Barracuda read as Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda Email read as Barracuda Email Protection
Check Point read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Check Point (Avanan) read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Check Point Harmony read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Check Point Harmony Email read as Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
Cisco read as Cisco Secure Email
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare Email Security
Cloudflare Area 1 read as Cloudflare Email Security
Darktrace read as Darktrace EMAIL
Google Workspace Security read as Google Workspace
Google Workspace security read as Google Workspace
Material read as Material Security
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Mimecast read as Mimecast Email Security
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Email Protection
Proofpoint Essentials read as Proofpoint Email Protection
Proofpoint Threat Protection read as Proofpoint Email Protection
Sophos read as Sophos Email
Sublime read as Sublime Security
TitanHQ read as SpamTitan
Trend Micro read as Trend Micro Email Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Apple iCloud Mail
Bitdefender Email Security
ESET Mail Security
Google Workspace Advanced Protection
Hushmail
McAfee Total Protection
Microsoft 365 EOP
Red Sift
Salesloft Drift
Skiff Mail
Skyhigh / IronPort (Cisco)
Trustmi
Vade Secure
Windows Defender standalone
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← DRPEDR →