Third-party risk management
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
UpGuardClear leader
53UpGuard10Panorays06Sprinto31others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
UpGuard vs BitsightUpGuard vs PrevalentUpGuard vs ProcessUnityPanorays vs Vanta TPRMPanorays vs SecurityScorecardPanorays vs BitsightPanorays vs PrevalentPanorays vs ProcessUnityVanta TPRM vs SecurityScorecardVanta TPRM vs BitsightVanta TPRM vs PrevalentVanta TPRM vs ProcessUnitySecurityScorecard vs BitsightSecurityScorecard vs PrevalentSecurityScorecard vs ProcessUnityBitsight vs PrevalentBitsight vs ProcessUnityPrevalent vs ProcessUnity
One product takes 53% of first choices here, so the chart would put ten markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Five products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management37%
11 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Caution level: High — especially for standalone vendor risk teams... "OneTrust's TPRM is absolute garbage except for the questionnaire function."” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Panorays17%
6 of 35 labels negative · 6 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Limited customization options, poor reporting capabilities, lack of clarity in risk assessment processes, inefficient risk management due to false positives” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
ProcessUnity35%
8 of 23 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Most enterprise tools (OneTrust, ProcessUnity) start at $50K+ annually—unsuitable for limited budgets.” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Bitsight24%
7 of 29 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“Why to be cautious: These tools are excellent for continuously monitoring a vendor's external perimeter ... treating an automated external "letter grade" ... as the complete picture ... is a major mistake” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
66 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 922 links across 201 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · UpGuard55 answers · 90 citations · 11 models
30 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Vanta30 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Risk Ledger29 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Panorays25 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Bitsight22 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Riskonnect18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sprinto16 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 6 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com | 53% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 | |
| Panorays panorays.com | 10% | 51 | 590 | 1 | 21,228 | 5 | 5 | |
| Vanta TPRM vanta.com | 6% | 101 | 72,260 | 120 | ||||
| Sprinto sprinto.com | 6% | 256 | 2,400 | 79 | 26,896 | 43 | ||
| ThirdProof thirdproof.ai | 4% | 6 | ||||||
| SecurityScorecard securityscorecard.com | 2% | 133 | 2,400 | 118 | 151,385 | 9 | 7 | |
| Bitsight bitsight.com | 2% | 160 | 4,400 | 146 | 126,245 | $60 | 31 | 4 |
| Prevalent mitratech.com | 2% | 96 | 74,000 | 4,082 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 | |
| ProcessUnity processunity.com | 2% | 109 | 880 | 19 | 2,672 | 17 | 2 | |
| StandardFusion standardfusion.com | 2% | 9 | 90 | 5 | 17 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bitsight.com, gartner.com, panorays.com, riskledger.com, riskonnect.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top third-party risk management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceStandardFusion, UpGuardChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
One alternative
SprintoSeven alternatives
Drata, MetricStream, Panorays, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMGPT-5.4 miniProcessUnityBitsightChangedno first choiceMittino first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, OnspringFour alternatives
Exiger, Interos, Prewave, ResilincOne alternative
Risk 365Gemini 3.5 FlashUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardagainst: Drata, Vanta TPRMSecurityScorecard, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
Vanta TPRM, Venminder, WhisticFour alternatives
Panorays, Sprinto, Vanta TPRM, WhisticSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecardFive alternatives
Attaxion, Risk Ledger, Sprinto, Vanta TPRM, VendorCheckThree alternatives
Panorays, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardPerplexity SonarUpGuardUpGuardHeldno first choiceUpGuardagainst: SmartSuiteno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard
Three alternatives
LogicGate, Panorays, StandardFusionFour alternatives
Hyperproof, Panorays, Prevalent, Vanta TPRMOne alternative
Vanta TPRMGrok 4.20UpGuardagainst: MetricStream, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardHeldagainst: Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnityProcessUnityUpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMno first choiceagainst: ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Two alternatives
Panorays, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMEight alternatives
Bitsight, Diligent One, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Bitsight, SecurityScorecardMistral SmallUpGuardSprinto, Vanta TPRMChangedProcessUnitySprinto, UpGuardno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Panorays, PrevalentFour alternatives
Bitsight, Panorays, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardFive alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardOne alternative
HyperproofDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuardUpGuardHeldagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalentno first choiceThirdProofagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard
Four alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMThree alternatives
Drata, Panorays, Vanta TPRMEight alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, VenminderThree alternatives
Business Radar, RiskXchange, UpGuardThree alternatives
AuditBoard, SAI360, StandardFusionLlama 4 MaverickPanorays, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMSprinto, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMChangedno first choiceUpGuardno first choicenothing named
One alternative
OnspringFour alternatives
IBM OpenPages, Risk Ledger, Riskonnect, Vanta TPRMQwen 3.7 FlashPanorays, UpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementPanoraysChangedagainst: Prevalentno first choiceVendorappagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardPrevalentagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
One alternative
ServiceNow Vendor Risk ManagementThree alternatives
Sprinto, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardOne alternative
Complies.aiThree alternatives
Drata, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Vanta TPRMKimi K2Panorays, UpGuardagainst: BitsightUpGuardChangedagainst: ProcessUnityProcessUnityFair TPRM, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, RiskRecon
Two alternatives
Prevalent, VenminderThree alternatives
Panorays, Prevalent, Vanta TPRMSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, VenminderThree alternatives
LT-VRM, SimpleRisk, VenminderGLM 4.7 FlashXUpGuardHyperproofChangedPanorays, UpGuardagainst: MetricStream, RiskonnectLT-VRM, ThirdProofagainst: Vanta TPRMUpGuardagainst: Panorays, Risk Ledger, Vanta TPRM
Four alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, Panorays, StandardFusion, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
LogicGate, Panorays, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMSeven alternatives
ComplyScore, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, SureCloud, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
ComplyJet, Nudge SecuritySix alternatives
Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, SureCloudMiniMax M2.5Panorays, UpGuardUpGuardChangedno first choiceUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Panorays
One alternative
SureCloudThree alternatives
Bitsight, Panorays, SecurityScorecardFour alternatives
Bitsight, Panorays, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:14 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 11:08 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 14:13 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:41 | yes | 36 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 12:47 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:57 | yes | 9 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:06 | yes | 13 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:19 | yes | 20 | 71 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:26 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:45 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 13:55 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:24 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:14 | yes | 37 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 09:22 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:30 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 10:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:16 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:51 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 11:48 | yes | 30 | 140 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 13:08 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 09:55 | yes | 11 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 14:02 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:08 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 13:35 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 13:21 | yes | 27 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 13:22 | yes | 12 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 14:10 | yes | 18 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 11:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:36 | yes | 14 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:04 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:53 | yes | 8 | 218 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 09:39 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 12:08 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 10:09 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 10:47 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:28 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 11:49 | yes | 31 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 12:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 14:08 | yes | 16 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:58 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:10 | yes | 16 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 12:38 | yes | 14 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 10:39 | yes | 22 | 104 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 11:22 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 13:17 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:33 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 13:38 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 11:46 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 12:19 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:32 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:53 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 12:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 10:57 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 10:55 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 12:40 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:54 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-09-17 11:22 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-09-17 09:39 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-09-17 09:40 | yes | 28 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-09-17 10:21 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version) | 2026-09-17 10:33 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-09-17 11:53 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks | 2026-09-17 11:18 | yes | 29 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-09-17 13:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-09-17 11:44 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-09-17 11:30 | yes | 30 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-09-17 09:52 | yes | 26 | 258 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-09-17 10:49 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (TPRM Module) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (Vendor Risk) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow (Risk Management) read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow (VRM) read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Vanta read as Vanta TPRM
Unresolved, counted raw
Bitsight-style ratings tools
Business Radar
Diligent ThirdPartyBond
Dun & Bradstreet
Lockpath
Prewave
Sourcery
SureDecks
VendorCheck
Venerable
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.