September 2026 Edition, published · The permanent record of that edition, superseded since. The current standing is on the category page →
Index › IT › Security operations › SIEM › Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

SIEM platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “SIEM platform”, and as “security information and event management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Splunk Enterprise Security 28%
30Microsoft Sentinel28Splunk Enterprise Security15Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM28others

30% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Microsoft Sentinel30%26%54criticized challenger
02Splunk Enterprise Security28%38%58criticized challenger
03Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM15%6%31accepted challenger
04Rapid7 InsightIDR11%10%21accepted challenger
05Google Security Operations Lab in the set6%4%25accepted challenger
06Exabeam2%4%28accepted challenger
07IBM QRadar2%35%43criticized challenger
08Securonix Unified Defense SIEM2%28%25criticized challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11LogRhythm0%64%14criticized challenger
09Elastic Security0%19%26accepted challenger
10CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM0%0%11accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other eleven models three times of 44. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Sentinel30%
02Splunk Enterprise Security28%
03Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM15%
04Rapid7 InsightIDR11%
05Google Security Operations6%
06Exabeam2%
07IBM QRadar2%
08Securonix Unified Defense SIEM2%
09Elastic Security0%
10CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM0%
11LogRhythm0%

What they warned about

Four of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk Enterprise Security
38%
22 of 58 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid if you need predictability: Traditional per-GB pricing models (like older Splunk pricing...” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
IBM QRadar
35%
15 of 43 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Critical warning: IBM sold QRadar's SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks... reached end-of-life in April 2026” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Microsoft Sentinel
26%
14 of 54 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid if you need predictability... Microsoft Sentinel pay-as-you-go) can become unpredictable” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
LogRhythm
64%
9 of 14 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 8 hard negative
“Platforms to Strongly Avoid... LogRhythm: Frequently called out in user forums as lacking community support, documentation, and scalability” Grok 4.20, negative prompt

What they cite

Twelve of the twelve models returned a source list in this edition: four return the pages they cited and eight the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

62 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 12 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 911 links across 226 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.

vendor site · UnderDefense52 answers · 67 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks33 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Exabeam18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Splunk18 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ManageEngine17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rapid714 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Microsoft13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best siem platform”, “siem platform”, “siem platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 30%
30%3712,240,000403,136
Splunk splunk.com
Splunk Enterprise Security 28%
28%18740,5006,832892,906 company120
Palo Alto Networks parent site
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM 15%
15%8640,5001,088
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightIDR 11%
11%8814,800798
Google Security Operations google.dev6%793905881,346109
Blumira blumira.com4%1081,300128,06010
Exabeam exabeam.com2%1101,9008266,72305
IBM parent site
IBM QRadar 2%
2%115201,00034,098
Securonix Unified Defense SIEM securonix.com2%482003,571$139
Elastic elastic.co
Elastic Security 0%
0%12474,00034,672208,306 company105

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (exabeam.com, gartner.com, manageengine.com, underdefense.com). The first result for “best siem platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SIEM platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security information and event management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SIEM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SIEM platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SIEM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SIEM platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Splunk Enterprise Securityno first choiceHeld
Four alternativesElastic Security, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
against: OpenText ArcSight, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Splunk Enterprise SecurityBlumira, Rapid7 InsightIDRagainst: Microsoft Sentinelno first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
One alternativeGoogle Security Operations
Microsoft SentinelChanged
Two alternativesElastic Security, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesElastic Security, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar
Microsoft Sentinel
One alternativeGoogle Security Operations
against: IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Devo, Elastic Security, Exabeam, Huawei, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Logpoint, Logz.io, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, NetWitness, OpenText ArcSight, QAX, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM, Venustech
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Google Security Operations, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft SentinelHeld
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
against: Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security
Five alternativesExabeam, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Three alternativesBlumira, Exabeam, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, OpenText ArcSight, Splunk Enterprise Security
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
no first choiceRapid7 InsightIDR
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, ManageEngine Log360
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
no first choiceagainst: Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Splunk Enterprise Security
Grok 4.20Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Elastic Security, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar
Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Elastic Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
no first choiceRapid7 InsightIDR
One alternativePalo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
against: Elastic Security, IBM QRadar, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choice
Five alternativesExabeam, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: Devo, FortiSIEM, Huawei HiSec Insight, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Mistral SmallPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Two alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Rapid7 InsightIDR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAMChanged
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon, NetWitness, Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Securonix Unified Defense SIEMno first choiceagainst: LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel
Four alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, IBM QRadar, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise SecurityChanged
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadarGoogle Security Operations
One alternativeExabeam
against: Datadog Cloud SIEM, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Elastic Security, Splunk Enterprise Securityagainst: FortiSIEM, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, OpenText ArcSight, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Llama 4 MaverickPalo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Three alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise SecurityChangedno first choiceRapid7 InsightIDRno first choiceagainst: LogRhythm, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Three alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Wazuh
Microsoft SentinelChanged
Three alternativesGoogle Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choice
Four alternativesIBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Two alternativesIBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Google Security Operations, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: Amazon GuardDuty, ELK Stack, Elasticsearch, IBM QRadar, Logpoint, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, OpenText ArcSight, SolarWinds Security Event Manager, Wazuh
Kimi K2Splunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Splunk Enterprise SecurityHeld
Two alternativesIBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceGoogle Security Operations
One alternativeRapid7 InsightIDR
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft Sentinel
Two alternativesIBM QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
GLM 4.7 FlashXSplunk Enterprise Security
Four alternativesExabeam, IBM QRadar, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel
Splunk Enterprise SecurityHeld
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
against: IBM QRadar
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Eight alternativesCrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Elastic Security, Exabeam, Google Security Operations, IBM QRadar, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Blumira
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations, Rapid7 InsightIDR
against: IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar Cloud, QRadar SOAR, and QRadar Log Insights
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Sentinel
Five alternativesElastic Security, Exabeam, IBM QRadar, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
IBM QRadar, Microsoft SentinelChanged
Two alternativesSecuronix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadarExabeam, Google Security Operations
One alternativeBlumira
against: Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security
Microsoft Sentinel
Two alternativesElastic Security, Splunk Enterprise Security
against: LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Securonix Unified Defense SIEM, Splunk Enterprise Security
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 09:09no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:49yes37 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:59yes1324 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:21yes196 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 09:09yes3115 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:45yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:21yes1013 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:50yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:47no040 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:47yes1029 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:52yes2253 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:07no012 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:42no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:52yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:11yes1427 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:18yes207 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:20yes199 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:27yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:54yes1413 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:51yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:37no037 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:55yes1527 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:33yes2087 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:53yes531 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:55yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:28yes38 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:38yes1827 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:43yes2010 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:40yes3118 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:48yes1312 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:52yes1721 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:18yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 09:01yes931 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:17yes1350 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:42yes17250 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:50yes2558 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:27yes169 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:11yes49 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 09:09yes2734 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:02yes186 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:35yes2414 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:03yes107 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:49yes1718 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:54yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:44yes550 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:55yes1029 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:40yes27281 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:13yes933 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:37yes1813 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 09:02no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:28no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 09:06yes208 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:31yes1911 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 09:03no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:43yes2730 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:49yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:42no044 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:39yes1528 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:36yes23223 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 09:12yes1934 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-09-17 08:23yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-09-17 08:35yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-09-17 08:53yes1225 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-09-17 08:41yes207 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex (asked for grok-4.20-non-reasoning; the API answered as this version)2026-09-17 08:47yes2313 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-09-17 08:54yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via fireworks2026-09-17 08:36yes2846 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-09-17 08:45yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-09-17 08:44no062 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-09-17 08:52yes1847 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-09-17 08:18yes29122 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-09-17 08:37yes1234 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ArcSight read as OpenText ArcSight
Cortex XSIAM read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM
Datadog read as Datadog Cloud SIEM
Elastic read as Elastic Security
Exabeam Fusion read as Exabeam
Fortinet read as FortiSIEM
Google Chronicle read as Google Security Operations
Google Chronicle (Security Operations) read as Google Security Operations
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations
ManageEngine read as ManageEngine Log360
OpenText read as OpenText ArcSight
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightIDR
Securonix read as Securonix Unified Defense SIEM
SolarWinds read as SolarWinds Security Event Manager
Splunk read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Cloud Platform read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise / Splunk Cloud (Cisco) read as Splunk Enterprise Security
Sumo Logic read as Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Unresolved, counted raw
Bloo
Huawei HiSec Insight
IBM QRadar Cloud, QRadar SOAR, and QRadar Log Insights
IBM\u2019s QRadar SaaS
QAX
Venustech
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Awareness trainingSOAR →