Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud is a threat intelligence platform from Recorded Future · recordedfuture.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
MISP is first at 19%.
MISP is first at 21%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence at 10%.
“Broad intelligence coverage, packaged for multiple teams... Uses AI and machine learning to provide real-time threat intelligence”Mistral Small · Comparative question · first choice
“Frequently ranked 1st in 2026 buyer lists... Broad enterprise coverage and packaging for multiple teams → Recorded Future.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Forrester's 2023 Wave report highlights leaders like Recorded Future and Mandiant (now Google) for overall capability.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Community consensus (as of late 2024) often favors Recorded Future, CrowdStrike, and ThreatConnect for reliability”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · first choice
“small businesses should generally avoid or be cautious about Recorded Future due to its high cost and steep learning curve”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Top-tier threat intelligence platforms (such as Recorded Future, Mandiant, or ThreatConnect) are legitimate, high-quality enterprise tools. However, they can turn into "shelfware"”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Independent user reviews note Recorded Future as complex to navigate with a big learning curve, difficulty creating accurate queries and managing data, and seen inaccuracy.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Avoid purchasing a premium feed such as Recorded Future solely for indicator volume unless the company has a dedicated intelligence analyst or SOC team”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud, over the 181 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 101 | 3 | View → | |
| 90 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 89 | 15 | Compare → | |
| 61 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 0 | View → | |
| 48 | 1 | View → | |
| 43 | 2 | View → | |
| 34 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 163 of the 181 answers that named Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
265 of the 352 domain citations in answers naming Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud came from a third party's page. Forty-nine were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 738 | undated | SIEM, SOAR | ||
| Report or ebook | 362 | undated | TPRM | ||
| News or press | 65 | undated | |||
| Case study | 61 | undated | MDR | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | undated | Threat intel | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page recordedfuture.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.