Threat intelligence platforms · RankedMandiant Threat Intelligence
Mandiant Threat Intelligence is a threat intelligence platform from Google · mandiant.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
MISP is first at 19%.
MISP is first at 21%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud is first at 62%.
Why models recommend it
“Mandiant Advantage (acquired by Google Cloud) — strong for mid-market”MiniMax M2.5 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Mandiant (Google) is industry-standard but can be pricey; however, their cloud-native integration is powerful.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Combines Mandiant's expertise with Google's scale; integrates deeply with Google Cloud ecosystem.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · alternative
“Do you rely heavily on Google/Cloud services? → Mandiant (Google Threat Intelligence) fits well.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“they can turn into "shelfware" if your organization's security operations center (SOC) lacks the maturity to use them”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Enterprise tips (like Recorded Future or Mandiant) can carry six-figure price tags with high implementation costs.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · warning
“provides adversary tracking but can be pricier and less "standalone."”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Mandiant and VirusTotal were folded into Google Threat Intelligence”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Mandiant Threat Intelligence, over the 49 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 14 | View → | |
| 35 | 2 | View → | |
| 31 | 1 | View → | |
| 27 | 4 | View → | |
| 25 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 11 | 1 | View → | |
| 7 | 2 | View → | |
| 7 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Mandiant Threat Intelligence →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Mandiant Threat Intelligence's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- organizations
- Customers named
- University of California, Riverside, Dunelm, Lloyds Banking Group
- Also from Mandiant
- Mandiant Advantage, Mandiant Security Validation
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 42 of the 49 answers that named Mandiant Threat Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Seventy-nine of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming Mandiant Threat Intelligence came from a third party's page. Nine were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Events in person
- September 16, 2026Rewriting the Security Playbook: Lessons from the AI FrontlinesAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026Lessons from 30 Years on the Cybercrime FrontlineAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026National Security, Frontline Defense: A Fireside Chat with CISA’s Nick AndersenAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026From Crisis to Culture: Building World-class Cybersecurity ProgramsAtrium Ballroom B · took part
- September 16, 2026Cyber Resilience through Isolated Recovery EnvironmentsAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026Accelerating Incident Response with Coding AgentsAtrium Ballroom A · took part
- September 16, 2026GTI Accelerator Workshop: Enhancing the Agentic AI ExperienceAtrium Ballroom B · took part
- September 16, 2026Inside Nation-State Attacks: Tactics, Resilience, and RecoveryAtrium Ballroom A · took part
- September 16, 2026ThreatSpace Lab - APT43 (DPRK)ThreatSpace Labs · took part
- September 16, 2026The Heist: Chasing an Advanced Crypto Attacker Across the Multi-cloudAtrium Ballroom A · took part
- September 16, 2026ThreatSpace Lab - SANDWORM RELIC (Russia)ThreatSpace Labs · took part
- September 16, 2026No Logs, No Corpus: Why AI Incidents Go UnsolvedAtrium Ballroom B · took part
- September 16, 2026Navigating a Perfect Storm: Federal Cyber Defense In a Shifting LandscapeAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026Context-driven Optimism: Practical AI wins from security triage to the boardroomAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026ThreatSpace Lab - UNC3944 (Scattered Spider)ThreatSpace Labs · took part
- September 16, 2026Guardrails for the Cloud: Securing AI Workloads Across AWS, Azure, and GCPAmphitheatre · took part
- September 16, 2026Zero Trust for AI Ops: Securing LLMs, RAG, and AgentsAtrium Ballroom A · took part
- September 16, 2026ThreatSpace Lab - OWASP LLM-Vulnerability #1- Prompt InjectionThreatSpace Labs · took part
- September 16, 2026The Evolution of the Analyst: Orchestrating AI for Multi-Hop Threat InvestigationsAtrium Ballroom B · took part
- September 15, 2026ThreatSpace Lab - OWASP LLM-Vulnerability #1- Prompt InjectionThreatSpace Labs · took part
As the event pages on mandiant.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mandiant.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.