Anomali ThreatStream is a threat intelligence platform that gives access to a repository of curated threat intelligence · anomali.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
MISP is first at 19%.
MISP is first at 21%. 4 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud is first at 62%.
“Anomali ThreatStream and Recorded Future are the top choices due to their comprehensive features and proven track records”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Anomali ThreatStream is highly rated for mid-sized businesses, offering a comprehensive platform”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Anomali ThreatStream (Strongest overall for mid-market)”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Anomali ThreatStream - Best Overall for Mid-Market”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Anomali has taken an aggressive AI-autonomy bet with ThreatStream Next-Gen, shipping agentic AI levels 1 and 2 autonomous triage and scoring”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“ThreatConnect or Anomali when treated as intelligence sources. These are primarily aggregation and operationalization layers”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“sometimes criticized for inheriting the quality issues of the feeds it ingests, which can lead to noise and false positives”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Frequently scores low in independent comparisons... Users report it as "noisy" with high false positives, dated feeds”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Anomali ThreatStream, over the 124 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 39 | Compare → | |
| 87 | 3 | View → | |
| 73 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 49 | 0 | View → | |
| 42 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 4 | View → | |
| 35 | 2 | View → | |
| 23 | 3 | View → | |
| 23 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Anomali ThreatStream →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Anomali ThreatStream's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 107 of the 124 answers that named Anomali ThreatStream and are not a share of its labels.
197 of the 254 domain citations in answers naming Anomali ThreatStream came from a third party's page. Thirty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 251 | 8 | 2026-09-22 | SIEM, XDR | |
| Conference or event | 234 | 7 | 2026-12-01 | XDR, SIEM | |
| Blog | 215 | 20 | 2026-09-29 | SIEM, Threat intel | |
| News or press | 178 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | Threat intel, XDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 107 | undated | Threat intel, SIEM | ||
| Podcast or video | 68 | undated | SIEM, ASM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 39 | undated | SIEM, XDR | ||
| Case study | 12 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | SIEM | |
| Comparison | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | SIEM, XDR |
As the event pages on anomali.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page anomali.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SIEM (47); 15 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.