2 categories · RankedGoogle Threat Intelligence
Google Threat Intelligence is a threat intelligence platform from Google SecOps that incorporates Mandiant and VirusTotal · google.dev ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
MISP is first at 19%.
MISP is first at 21%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud is first at 62%.
Why models recommend it
“You need deep adversary research: start with Google Threat Intelligence”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“Evaluate Google Threat Intelligence Standard for IOC enrichment and alert prioritization in that ecosystem.”GPT-6 Luna · Direct question · alternative
“Need expert, human-validated analysis of specific adversaries? → Google/Mandiant or Intel 471”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for frontline adversary and malware intelligence: Google Threat Intelligence”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“integration outside the Google stack can be limited or require significant additional configuration”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Google Threat Intelligence when your environment is not Google-centric. Validate integrations”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“these may be harder to justify for a smaller security team”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · warning
“Google Threat Intelligence costing $20,592 per year”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Google Threat Intelligence, over the 52 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | 20 | View → | |
| 38 | 2 | View → | |
| 35 | 2 | View → | |
| 34 | 2 | View → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 1 | View → | |
| 15 | 2 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Google Threat Intelligence →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 52 of the 52 answers that named Google Threat Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
121 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Google Threat Intelligence came from a third party's page. Thirteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |