Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Employee monitoring › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Employee monitoring for enterprise buyers
Asked as “employee monitoring tool”, and as “workforce productivity analytics software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · ActivTrak 16%
27Teramind16ActivTrak16Visier40others
27% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Teramind held the lead, +1 point on 26%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Teramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseTeramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Teramind27%15%55accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.26% → 27%
Teramind27%15%55accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.26% → 27%02ActivTrak16%4%57accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 16% → 16%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 16%
ActivTrak16%4%57accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 16% → 16%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 16%03
Visier16%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 16% → 16%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 16%
Visier16%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 16% → 16%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 16%04
Insightful13%5%38accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 13%
Insightful13%5%38accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 8% → 13%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 13%05
Microsoft Viva Insights7%7%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 7%
Microsoft Viva Insights7%7%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 8% → 7%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 7%06
Workday People Analytics5%9%11accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Workday People Analytics5%9%11accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%07
Veriato2%20%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Veriato2%20%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Controlio0%50%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Controlio0%50%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Time Doctor0%47%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Time Doctor0%47%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Hubstaff0%26%31criticized challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%
Hubstaff0%26%31criticized challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Teramind27%
Teramind27%02ActivTrak16%
ActivTrak16%03Visier16%
Visier16%04Insightful13%
Insightful13%05Microsoft Viva Insights7%
Microsoft Viva Insights7%06Workday People Analytics5%
Workday People Analytics5%07Veriato2%
Veriato2%08Hubstaff0%
Hubstaff0%09Controlio0%
Controlio0%10Time Doctor0%
Time Doctor0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Teramind15%
8 of 55 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“avoid or exercise extreme caution with tools like InterGuard, ActivTrak, Time Doctor, Hubstaff, Teramind, Veriato, Controlio” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Hubstaff26%
8 of 31 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Tools like Hubstaff (which saw rapid growth post-pandemic but has been criticized for location tracking, screenshots, and productivity scoring that can feel overly surveillant).” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Time Doctor47%
7 of 15 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“avoid or exercise extreme caution with tools like InterGuard, ActivTrak, Time Doctor, Hubstaff, Teramind, Veriato, Controlio” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Veriato20%
6 of 30 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“avoid or exercise extreme caution with tools like InterGuard, ActivTrak, Time Doctor, Hubstaff, Teramind, Veriato, Controlio” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 901 links across 265 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G225 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Insightful24 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Teramind21 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CurrentWare20 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ActivTrak15 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teramind teramind.co | 27% | 134 | 5,400 | 119 | 19,425 | $518 | 48 | |
| ActivTrak activtrak.com | 16% | 173 | 8,100 | 156 | 18,356 | $11,550 | 47 | 1 |
| Visier visier.com | 16% | 192 | 2,400 | 72 | 40,267 | 16 | ||
| Insightful insightful.io | 13% | 101 | 135,000 | 31,732 | 51,763 | $34 | 37 | 6 |
| Microsoft Purview microsoft.com Microsoft Viva Insights 7%, Microsoft Purview 0%, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management 0% | 7% | 30 | 12,100 | 661 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Workday parent site Workday People Analytics 5%, Workday HCM 2% | 7% | 211 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| Veriato veriato.com | 2% | 51 | 480 | 13 | 485 | $43 | 8 | |
| EmpMonitor | 2% | |||||||
| Jibble jibble.io | 2% | 57 | 9,900 | 108 | 67,211 | 1 | ||
| StaffCop | 2% | 30 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (activtrak.com, insightful.io, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best employee monitoring tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee monitoring tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which workforce productivity analytics software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade employee monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee monitoring tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an employee monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which employee monitoring tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Insightful, TeramindVisierChangedInsightful, TeramindInsightfulno first choiceagainst: Amazon
Two alternatives
ActivTrak, WorkTimeFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Viva Insights, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, VeriatoOne alternative
ProofHubGPT-5.4 miniActivTrakMicrosoft Viva Insights, Workday Peakon Employee VoiceChangedTeramindagainst: ControlioTeramindagainst: Controlio, Hubstaff, Insightfulno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindOne alternative
ProHanceThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, InsightfulGemini 3.5 FlashTeramindMicrosoft Viva InsightsChangedTeramind, VeriatoTeramindno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Time Doctor, VeriatoFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Jellyfish, LinearB, Sapience Analytics, TeramindThree alternatives
ActivTrak, DTEX Systems, InsightfulThree alternatives
CurrentWare, Insightful, KickidlerPerplexity SonarInsightfulVisierChangedTeramindJibbleno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, StaffCop, TeramindFour alternatives
ActivTrak, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsFive alternatives
ActivTrak, CurrentWare, Hubstaff, Insightful, VeriatoTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, InsightfulGrok 4.20TeramindVisierChangedagainst: Pyze, We360.aiInsightful, TeramindTeramindagainst: Microsoft Purview DLPno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Microsoft Viva Insights, Sneek, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, VeriatoTwo alternatives
Microsoft Viva Insights, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, VeriatoThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Forcepoint, SafeticaMistral SmallTeramindVisierChangedTeramindActivTrak, Insightfulagainst: Kickidler, Teramindno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Amazon, Apple, Controlio, Hubstaff, InterGuard, Meta, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato, Workday People Analytics
Four alternatives
ActivTrak, BambooHR, CurrentWare, InsightfulFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Viva Insights, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, We360.ai, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, InsightfulDeepSeek V4 FlashTeramindVisierChangedno first choiceTeramind, VeriatoActivTrakagainst: Time Doctoragainst: BeyondTrust Remote Support, Clever Control, ConnectWise ScreenConnect, Controlio, CurrentWare, SimpleHelp, Spyera, Teramind, Veriato
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, VeriatoThree alternatives
Microsoft Viva Insights, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, InsightfulThree alternatives
Insightful, Teramind, VeriatoLlama 4 MaverickInsightfulWorkday People AnalyticsChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, TeramindFour alternatives
One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, VisierQwen 3.7 FlashActivTrak, TeramindVisierChangedTeramindTeramindno first choiceagainst: DeskTime, Hubstaff, StaffCop, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, Time DoctorThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Viva Insights, Workday People AnalyticsFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, VeriatoTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, TimeDoctorKimi K2TeramindActivTrak, Microsoft Viva InsightsChangedTeramindagainst: Hubstaff, Time DoctorInterGuard, StaffCopno first choiceagainst: Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramindnothing named
Three alternatives
DTEX InTERCEPT, Proofpoint ITM, VeriatoTwo alternatives
Visier, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, VeriatoFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Forcepoint, Proofpoint ITM, SentryPCOne alternative
ActivTrakGLM 4.7 FlashXActivTrak, TeramindVisierChangedTeramind, VeriatoActivTrakno first choiceagainst: FlexiSPY, Hubstaff, Prodoscore, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato
One alternative
InsightfulFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Lattice, Teramind, Workday Prism AnalyticsFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Controlio, Hubstaff, InsightfulTwo alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindMiniMax M2.5TeramindVisier, Workday People AnalyticsChangedTeramindEmpMonitorno first choiceagainst: CleverControl, Kickidler, Spyrix
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, Time DoctorTwo alternatives
Microsoft Viva Insights, TeramindSix alternatives
ActivTrak, Controlio, Hubstaff, Insightful, Time Doctor, VeriatoThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, TeramindGPT-6 LunaActivTrakMicrosoft Viva Insights, WorklyticsChangedno first choiceInsightfulno first choiceagainst: Controlio, Hubstaff, Kickidler, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato, WorkComposer
Two alternatives
Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, TeramindOne alternative
ActivTrakFive alternatives
ActivTrak, Insightful, Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, Teramind, VeriatoOne alternative
VeriatoMuse Glimmer 30BInsightfulVisier, Workday HCM, Workday People AnalyticsChangedagainst: ADPTeramindActivTrak, Teramindno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Teramind, VeriatoThree alternatives
ActivTrak Work Intelligence, Insightful, Microsoft Viva InsightsSeven alternatives
ActivTrak, Controlio, Hubstaff, Insightful, SentryPC, Time Doctor, VeriatoOne alternative
InsightfulBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:26 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 20 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 22 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 24 | 103 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 22 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 14 | 71 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 23 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 14 | 85 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 21 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:49 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:10 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:53 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:07 | no | 0 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 2 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 14 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
ActivTrak Work Intelligence
Apple
BeyondTrust Remote Support
Clever Control
Code42 Incydr (now Mimecast)
ConnectWise ScreenConnect
ContentWatch
CrowdStrike (Hummer)
DTEX
DTEX InTERCEPT
Ekran System
EmailAnalytics
EmpCloud
Forcepoint Insider Threat
LinearB
Microsoft Purview DLP
ObserveIT (now Proofpoint)
ProofHub
Pyze
Safetica
SimpleHelp
Sneek
SoftActivity
Spyera
Symantec
Symantec DLP
TimeDoctor
Track.ly
Varonis
Workfolio.io
iMonitorSoft
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.