2 categories · RankedActivTrak
ActivTrak is software for people analytics and performance management · activtrak.com ↗
Leads at mid-market. Ranked 2 of 94 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first, contested: Hubstaff has 20%.
Ranked first. Next is Hubstaff at 18%. 11 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Teramind is first at 27%.
Why models recommend it
“For most small-to-mid-sized businesses, ActivTrak or Insightful offer the best balance between productivity insight and employee trust.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“If you need zero cost to start: ActivTrak free 3-user for high-level productivity analytics, or Clockify free for basic time tracking”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“For most organizations, ActivTrak or Insightful is the better starting point for non-invasive productivity analysis”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“ActivTrak is the most consistently top-rated employee monitoring / workforce intelligence option for that segment”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
What gives them pause
“keystroke logging and screenshot capture tools ... several have faced legal challenges in the EU under GDPR”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Privacy groups group these with Teramind under the broad term "bossware."”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Strong caution or avoid unless strictly necessary and transparent”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“ActivTrak *searches for suspicious activities by employees and examines them in context to decipher "true intentions,"”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ActivTrak, over the 189 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 139 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 130 | 23 | View → | |
| 98 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 87 | 1 | View → | |
| 49 | 3 | View → | |
| 42 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 1 | View → | |
| 24 | 8 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of ActivTrak →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on ActivTrak's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- leaders and enterprises
- Price stated
- Free $0; Work Activity Tracking $10 worker/month billed annually; Workforce Management $15 worker/month billed annually; Productivity Optimization $17 worker/month billed annually; Workflow $21 worker/month billed annually
- Starting price
- 0
- Free plan or trial
- Get started free
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA
- Hosting
- US, EU, UK, AU, CA
- Customers named
- Parts ASAP, AGI
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 173 of the 189 answers that named ActivTrak and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
506 of the 506 domain citations in answers naming ActivTrak came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 693 | 22 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| News or press | 88 | 4 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Case study | 21 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 1 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2022-10-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2019-05-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15451 report q326 blog
- 2026-09-14Build work intelligence program blog
- 2026-09-13Ai adoption benchmarks by stage of growth blog
- 2026-09-12Scaling ai across the organization blog
- 2026-09-12Ai enablement vs ai expansion comparison
- 2026-09-10Ai maturity assessment by team blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page activtrak.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.