3 categories · RankedTeramind
Teramind is a workforce analytics and insider risk platform · teramind.co ↗
Strongest at enterprise, contested with ActivTrak. Ranked 48 of 59 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ActivTrak is first at 39%.
ActivTrak is first at 47%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: ActivTrak has 16%.
Why models recommend it
“Teramind (Best Overall for Security and Threat Detection)”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“if data security and insider threat prevention are your top priorities ... Teramind is worth the extra investment.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · alternative
“with Teramind and Hubstaff cited as strong alternatives depending on whether you prioritize security/risk or time-tracking”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
“If you need forensic capture, DLP and insider threat detection → Teramind/Veriato/Controlio/CurrentWare.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Frequently ranked as the *most invasive*... Avoid unless in regulated industries with strict oversight; it's often criticized for resembling spyware.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Platforms that track keystrokes, log active mouse movements, take stealth screenshots... (e.g., *Hubstaff, Time Doctor, Teramind*)”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Teramind is cited as a provider whose sales mix flipped from security to productivity monitoring after COVID.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“keystroke logging and screenshot capture tools ... heavily criticized by employees and labor advocates”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Teramind, over the 149 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 130 | 34 | View → | |
| 112 | 12 | View → | |
| 82 | 11 | View → | |
| 74 | 2 | View → | |
| 56 | 0 | View → | |
| 36 | 1 | View → | |
| 23 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Teramind →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Teramind's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- CISOs, HR, executives, security and HR teams
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial
- Customers named
- Western Reserve, VIVA, Marble Box, BRMS, Peak Support
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 134 of the 149 answers that named Teramind and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
345 of the 380 domain citations in answers naming Teramind came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 168 | 21 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 0 | 2025-07-12 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Workforce planning analytics blog
- 2026-09-24Pharma biotech insider risk blog
- 2026-09-22Workforce planning metrics blog
- 2026-09-21Dtex vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-17Proofpoint vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-15Legal dlp blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teramind.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.