Employee monitoring
Asked as “employee monitoring tool”, and as “workforce productivity analytics software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47ActivTrak18Hubstaff08Insightful27others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.ActivTrak held the lead, +14 points on 33%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprise
Teramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
ActivTrak39%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ActivTrak (39%) replaces Hubstaff (23% then, 20% now), 19 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketActivTrak47%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseTeramind27%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 26% → 27%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ActivTrak47%3%60endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.33% → 47%
ActivTrak47%3%60endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 33% → 47%, +14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.33% → 47%02
Hubstaff18%9%54accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 8% → 18%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 18%
Hubstaff18%9%54accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 8% → 18%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 18%03
Insightful8%0%33accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 16% → 8%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 8%
Insightful8%0%33accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 16% → 8%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 8%04
DeskTime4%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
DeskTime4%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%05
Clockify4%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Clockify4%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06Teramind0%21%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Teramind0%21%43accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
Veriato0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Veriato0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Time Doctor0%15%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Time Doctor0%15%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Monitask0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Monitask0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
CurrentWare0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CurrentWare0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01ActivTrak47%
ActivTrak47%02Hubstaff18%
Hubstaff18%03Insightful8%
Insightful8%04DeskTime4%
DeskTime4%05Clockify4%
Clockify4%06Teramind0%
Teramind0%07Time Doctor0%
Time Doctor0%08Monitask0%
Monitask0%09CurrentWare0%
CurrentWare0%10Veriato0%
Veriato0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Teramind21%
9 of 43 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Frequently ranked as the *most invasive*... Avoid unless in regulated industries with strict oversight; it's often criticized for resembling spyware.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Time Doctor15%
5 of 34 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Highest Concern Tools ... Time Doctor ... Employees widely report it creates a culture of micromanagement and distrust.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Hubstaff9%
5 of 54 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Hubstaff *measures the movement of the mouse and the speed of keyboard strokes to endure high levels of productivity.*” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
InterGuard
100%
4 of 4 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Often stealthy with broad logging (emails, chats, files)... they can feel like malware.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 730 links across 206 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Insightful28 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CurrentWare19 answers · 20 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Hubstaff16 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ActivTrak16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rework16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Desklog13 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tool”, “employee monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActivTrak activtrak.com | 47% | 173 | 8,100 | 156 | 18,356 | $11,550 | 47 | 1 |
| Hubstaff hubstaff.com | 18% | 172 | 18,100 | 202 | 100,097 | 120 | ||
| Insightful insightful.io | 8% | 101 | 135,000 | 31,732 | 51,763 | $34 | 37 | 6 |
| DeskTime desktime.com | 4% | 48 | 1,000 | 25 | 9,245 | 5 | ||
| Clockify clockify.me | 4% | 133 | 60,500 | 1,093 | 2,084,749 | 40 | ||
| Apploye apploye.com | 2% | 17 | 480 | 4 | 45,528 | 1 | ||
| Traqq traqq.com | 2% | 8 | ||||||
| Worklytics worklytics.co | 2% | 13 | ||||||
| Handdy Timesheets | 2% | |||||||
| HiBob Analytics | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (activtrak.com, insightful.io, peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best employee monitoring tool” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best employee monitoring tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which workforce productivity analytics software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top employee monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best employee monitoring tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an employee monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which employee monitoring tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5InsightfulHiBob AnalyticsChangedno first choiceDeskTimeno first choiceagainst: Amazon
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Teramind, eMonitorFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, ActivTrak, Microsoft Viva Insights, PaycorTwo alternatives
Apploye, MonitaskGPT-5.4 miniActivTrakActivTrakHeldActivTrakTraqqno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, TeramindFour alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Pega Workforce Intelligence, WorkiQSix alternatives
CurrentWare, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, VeriatoTwo alternatives
Monitask, WE ControlioGemini 3.5 FlashActivTrakActivTrakHeldno first choiceClockify, Jibbleno first choiceagainst: Crossover, Hubstaff, InterGuard, Sneek / Teleport, Teramind, Time Doctor, Trackpilots, Veriato
Three alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, TeramindThree alternatives
Insightful, Prodoscore, TeramindSix alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, VeriatoFour alternatives
Apploye, Hubstaff, Insightful, MonitaskPerplexity SonarActivTrakActivTrakHeldActivTrak, InsightfulApployeagainst: Jibbleno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, WorkTimeFour alternatives
Desklog, Rippling, Teramind, Timesheet 365Eight alternatives
Controlio, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Monitask, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato, actiTIMEThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, MonitaskGrok 4.20ActivTrakagainst: TeramindActivTrakHeldTeramindagainst: KickidlerHubstaffagainst: Teramindno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, DeskTime, Hubstaff, InterGuard, Kickidler, SentryPC, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, InsightfulThree alternatives
Desklog, Hubstaff, InsightfulThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, InsightfulFour alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, Time Doctor, Toggl TrackMistral SmallActivTrak, InsightfulActivTrakChangedTraqqHanddy Timesheets, Kickidlerno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
CurrentWare, Time DoctorTwo alternatives
Hubstaff, Microsoft Viva InsightsEight alternatives
ActivTrak, Connecteam, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, VeriatoThree alternatives
ActivTrak, SentryPC, WorkTimeDeepSeek V4 FlashActivTrakActivTrakHeldno first choiceActivTrak, TimeCampno first choiceagainst: CleverControl, Hubstaff, InterGuard, StaffCop, Teramind, Time Doctor
Four alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time DoctorFour alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, Microsoft Viva Insights, Time DoctorSix alternatives
ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, VeriatoThree alternatives
CleverControl, Hubstaff, Time DoctorLlama 4 MaverickActivTrakno first choiceChangedno first choiceDeskTimeno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Hubstaff, Teramind, Time DoctorQwen 3.7 FlashHubstaffActivTrakChangedActivTrak, InsightfulHubstaffno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
ActivTrak, Teramind, Time DoctorFour alternatives
Desklog, Hubstaff, Microsoft Viva Insights, VisierFour alternatives
CurrentWare, DeskTime, Hubstaff, TeramindThree alternatives
Clockify, Time Doctor, TimingKimi K2ActivTrakActivTrakHeldagainst: Teramind, Visier, Workday People Analyticsno first choiceHubstaffno first choiceagainst: Hubstaff, InterGuard, Sapience, StaffCop, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato, Worksmart
Three alternatives
Hubstaff, Teramind, Time DoctorThree alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, Microsoft Viva InsightsSeven alternatives
ActivTrak, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Kickidler, Teramind, Time DoctorThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Clockify, DeskTimeGLM 4.7 FlashXInsightfulHubstaffChangedno first choiceHiveDesk, Hubstaffno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ActivTrak, BambooHR, Teramind, VeriatoTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, WorklyticsFifteen alternatives
ActivTrak, Apploye, CleverControl, Connecteam, Controlio, CurrentWare, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Kickidler, Modge, Teramind, Time Doctor, Veriato, WebWork Time TrackerTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, ApployeMiniMax M2.5ActivTrak, InsightfulActivTrak, HubstaffChangedno first choiceHubstaffno first choiceagainst: FlexiSPY, Teramind
One alternative
TeramindOne alternative
TeramindTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, WebWorkGPT-6 LunaActivTrakWorklyticsChangedActivTrakActivTrakno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, Microsoft Viva InsightsThree alternatives
Hubstaff, Insightful, TeramindOne alternative
HubstaffMuse Glimmer 30BActivTrakHubstaffChangedno first choiceActivTrak, Clockifyno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, CleverControl, Hubstaff, InterGaurd, StaffCop, Teramind, Time Doctor
Two alternatives
Hubstaff, TeramindTwo alternatives
ActivTrak, InsightfulEight alternatives
ActivTrak, Controlio, DeskTime, Hubstaff, Insightful, Teramind, Time Doctor, VeriatoTwo alternatives
CleverControl, HubstaffBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 1 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 16 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 13 | 68 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 14 | 61 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 59 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 23 | 126 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 9 | 83 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:44 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 19 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 15 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 88 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Toggl read as Toggl Track
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
BambooHR EMS
HiBob Analytics
InterGaurd
Pega Workforce Intelligence
Sneek / Teleport
StaffCounter
Timing
WE Controlio
WorkiQ
Workstatus
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.