November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Contingent workforce man · November 2026 Edition

Contingent workforce management

Asked as “vendor management system for contingent workers”, and as “freelancer management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Worksome 15%
15SimpleVMS15Worksome11SimplifyVMS60others

15% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Worksome (15%) replaces VectorVMS (16% then, 11% now), 4 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Worksome leads at 15%, replacing VectorVMS, which led at 16% and stands at 11% now: 4 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Worksome15%5%22accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 7% → 15%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 15%
02SimpleVMS15%0%13accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 5% → 15%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 15%
03SimplifyVMS11%5%21accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 11%
04VectorVMS11%0%17accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 16% → 11%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 11%
05Worksuite9%7%28accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%
06Conexis VMS9%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
07Deel Contractor4%4%25accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
08TalentDesk.io4%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
09Magnit4%27%26criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
10Beeline Extended Workforce Platform4%41%44criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
11Workday VNDLY2%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
12Fiverr2%29%14criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16SAP Fieldglass0%65%43criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
14Upwork0%28%25criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
15Coupa Contingent Workforce0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Rippling0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
D07
08
09
B10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Worksome15%
02SimpleVMS15%
03SimplifyVMS11%
04VectorVMS11%
05Worksuite9%
06Conexis VMS9%
07Deel Contractor4%
08TalentDesk.io4%
09Magnit4%
10Beeline Extended Workforce Platform4%
11Workday VNDLY2%
12Fiverr2%
13Rippling0%
14Upwork0%
15Coupa Contingent Workforce0%
16SAP Fieldglass0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Fieldglass
65%
28 of 43 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget - SAP Fieldglass and Beeline — These are enterprise-focused, carry heavy implementation complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
41%
18 of 44 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid starting with SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, Magnit, or similar enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Magnit
27%
7 of 26 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid starting with SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, Magnit, or similar enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Upwork
28%
7 of 25 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid using this as your sole management tool if you need strict governance and spend control.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 861 links across 240 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

34 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
33 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 61 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Worksuite25 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Venn19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Beeline15 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TalentDesk14 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
vendor site · SimpleVMS12 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Workday9 answers · 15 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best vendor management system for contingent workers”, “contingent workforce platforms”, “vendor management system for contingent workers”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Worksome worksome.com15%5888071,22624
SimpleVMS simplevms.com15%362,90003,19902
SimplifyVMS simplifyvms.com11%5121069955
VectorVMS pixid.com11%36390131177
Worksuite worksuite.com9%6788058,941
Conexis conexisvmssoftware.com
Conexis VMS 9%
9%445001,153 company02
Deel deel.com
Deel Contractor 4%, Deel Hire 2%, Deel HR 0%
5%7140,5001,210307,175 company$330,608118
TalentDesk.io talentdesk.io4%432002,38440
Magnit magnitglobal.com4%799,90082713,89301
Connecteam connecteam.com4%69349,500288312,449$13,504120

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (appsruntheworld.com, conexisvmssoftware.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, simplevms.com, venn.com, workday.com). The first result for “best vendor management system for contingent workers” is magnitglobal.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which freelancer management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top contingent workforce platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best vendor management system for contingent workers for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a vendor management system for contingent workers. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contingent workforce platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Worksuite
Three alternativesConexis VMS, Magnit, Workday VNDLY
against: SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceChangedMagnit
Eight alternativesADP, Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel Contractor, Instawork, SAP, TalentDesk.io, Upwork
SimpleVMS
Two alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Conexis VMS
no first choiceagainst: Instawork, Qwick, Tend
GPT-5.4 miniBeeline Extended Workforce Platform
Three alternativesSAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
Deel HireChanged
Two alternativesUpwork, Worksuite
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Four alternativesMagnit, SAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS, Workday VNDLY
Fill
One alternativeTradogram
against: SAP Fieldglass
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorksuite
Five alternativesConexis VMS, Deel Contractor, Rippling, VectorVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
WorksomeChanged
Four alternativesDeel Contractor, Fiverr, TalentDesk.io, Upwork
no first choice
Eight alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Deel Contractor, Magnit, Rippling, SAP Fieldglass, TalentDesk.io, Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
Conexis VMS, TalentDesk.io, Worksuite
Five alternativesDeel Contractor, Rippling, SimpleVMS, Transformify, Zoho Recruit VMS
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
no first choicenothing named
Perplexity SonarMagnit
Three alternativesSimpleVMS, Workday VNDLY, Worksuite
against: SAP Fieldglass
WorksomeChanged
Four alternativesDeel Contractor, Upwork, Worksuite, YunoJuno
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
Ten alternativesCoupa Contingent Workforce, Deel Contractor, Magnit, TalentDesk.io, Ubeya, Upwork, WorkMarket, Workday VNDLY, Worksome, Worksuite
SimpleVMS
Two alternativesPrecoro, TalentDesk.io
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
no first choiceagainst: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Deel Contractor, SAP Fieldglass, Venn, WorkMarket, Workday VNDLY, Worksome, Worksuite
Grok 4.20Magnit
Four alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Coupa Contingent Workforce, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
against: SAP Fieldglass
Deel ContractorChanged
Five alternativesRemote, Upwork, Worksome, Worksuite, YunoJuno
against: Upwork
Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Deel Contractor, SimplifyVMS, Upwork
SimpleVMS
Four alternativesConexis VMS, Deel Contractor, VectorVMS, Worksuite
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Workday VNDLY
Three alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SimplifyVMS
against: SAP Fieldglass
against: Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Guru.com, PeoplePerHour, Upwork
Mistral SmallSimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
One alternativeConexis VMS
WorksuiteChanged
Four alternativesDeel HR, TalentDesk.io, Upwork, Worksome
Magnit
Three alternativesFiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
Connecteam, Precoro
One alternativeGatekeeper
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
DeepSeek V4 FlashSimplifyVMS
Three alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Conexis VMS, VectorVMS
against: Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
WorksomeChanged
Three alternativesDeel Contractor, TalentDesk.io, Worksuite
against: Upwork
no first choice
Twelve alternativesAllegis Global Solutions, Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, CXC Global, Deel Contractor, Fiverr, Magnit, Randstad Sourceright, SAP Fieldglass, Toptal, Upwork, Workday VNDLY, Worksome
SimpleVMS
Two alternativesConexis VMS, VectorVMS
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglassagainst: Arise Virtual Solutions, Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Fiverr, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
Llama 4 MaverickSimplifyVMS, VectorVMSTalentDesk.io, Worksome, YunoJunoChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSimpliVMS
Two alternativesMagnit, Worksuite
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
Deel ContractorChanged
Three alternativesGusto, Oyster, Rippling
SAP Fieldglass
Four alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Deel Contractor, Rippling, Workday Contingent Workers
Conexis VMS
Three alternativesConnecteam, Deel HR, SimpleVMS
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: Cynapse/Aveneer, SAP Fieldglass, Verity
Kimi K2Conexis VMS, VectorVMS
One alternativeSimplifyVMS
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Fiverr, WorksomeChanged
One alternativeTalentDesk.io
against: Worksuite
Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Seven alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Deel Contractor, Fiverr, Remote, Toptal, Upwork, Workday VNDLY
SimpleVMS
Two alternativesBridge VMS, Conexis VMS
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
SimplifyVMS
Three alternativesMagnit, VectorVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
against: DoorDash, Field Nation, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, GigSmart, Instacart, Lyft, Uber, Upwork, Wonolo
GLM 4.7 FlashXConexis VMS, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
One alternativeAgileOne
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, SAP Fieldglass
WorksomeChanged
Four alternativesDeel Hire, Field Nation, Upwork, YunoJuno
no first choice
Eighteen alternativesAvature VMS, Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, CXC Global, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel HR, Deputy, Field Nation, Magnit, Openforce, Rippling, SAP Fieldglass, SimplifyVMS, TalentDesk.io, Trusted Herd, WorkForce Software, Worksome, Worksuite, Zoho Workerly
SimpleVMS
Four alternativesBridgeVMS, Conexis VMS, Connecteam, Worksuite
against: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Ivalua, SAP Ariba, SAP Fieldglass
no first choiceagainst: SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
MiniMax M2.5VectorVMS
Two alternativesConexis VMS, SimplifyVMS
WorksuiteChanged
Two alternativesDeel Contractor, Remote
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass
Six alternativesAllegis Global Solutions, Deel Contractor, Gusto, Randstad Sourceright, Remote, Upwork
Connecteam
One alternativeWorksuite
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaBeeline Extended Workforce Platform
Two alternativesSimpleVMS, Workday VNDLY
against: SAP Fieldglass
WorksomeChanged
Three alternativesDeel Contractor, Upwork, Worksuite
Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit, SAP Fieldglass, Workday VNDLY
Two alternativesAvature Contingent Workforce Management, Coupa Contingent Workforce
SimpleVMS
One alternativeConexis VMS
no first choiceagainst: Handy / Angi Services, Instawork, WorkWhile
Muse Glimmer 30BConexis VMS, SimplifyVMS, VectorVMS
Two alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, Magnit
against: SAP Fieldglass
WorksomeChanged
Four alternativesDeel Hire, Upwork, WorkMarket, Worksuite
SAP
Eight alternativesBeeline Extended Workforce Platform, CXC Global, Coupa Contingent Workforce, Deel HR, Magnit, TalentDesk.io, Worksome, Worksuite
SimpleVMS
One alternativeSimplifyVMS
no first choiceagainst: Beeline Extended Workforce Platform, Fiverr, Freelancer.com, Magnit, formerly PRO Unlimited/Workforce Logiq, SAP Fieldglass, Upwork
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:33yes179 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:26yes47 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:50yes923 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:23yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:14yes934 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:26yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:20yes2422 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:13yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:05yes1030 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:13yes1432 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:42yes1348 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:19yes1069 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:30yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:24yes1319 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:48no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:31yes27 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:58no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:35yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:09yes541 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:09yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:52yes1722 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:06yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:07no032 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:46yes1521 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:52yes746 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:16yes2087 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:48yes516 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:24yes1315 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:05yes910 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:05yes513 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:35yes422 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:06yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:06yes936 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:31yes1410 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:25yes2340 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:19yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:20yes934 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:44yes1926 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:28yes1452 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:51yes2032 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:29yes719 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:09yes1424 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:48yes1811 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:03yes38 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:57yes916 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:37yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:07yes929 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:30yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:44yes2227 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:49yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:30yes839 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:57yes1734 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:44yes2024 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:52yes532 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:21yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:38yes2224 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:48no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:39no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:34yes927 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:49yes1010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:24yes1334 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:12no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:03yes2435 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:49yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:56yes523 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:49yes1555 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:29yes24109 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:04no023 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:56yes319 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:22yes1320 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:39yes3513 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:19yes023 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:28yes918 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:54yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:13yes1043 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:21yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:17yes2133 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:38yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:57no033 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:59yes2557 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:09yes24296 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:37no023 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:58yes327 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:09yes2436 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Avature read as Avature VMS
Beeline read as Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Beeline Professional read as Beeline Extended Workforce Platform
Conexis read as Conexis VMS
Coupa read as Coupa Contingent Workforce
Deel read as Deel Contractor
Freelancer read as Freelancer.com
SAP Fieldglass Contingent Workforce Management read as SAP Fieldglass
TalentDesk read as TalentDesk.io
Unresolved, counted raw
Beeline Mid-Market
BridgeVMS
CXC
Citrix
Cynapse/Aveneer
Fill
Handy / Angi Services
Magnit, formerly PRO Unlimited/Workforce Logiq
Ogram
Openforce
Profire
Synergal
Tend (Tend Exchange)
Trusted Herd
Verity
WorkLLama
Workday Contingent Workers (formerly VNDLY)
Zoho Recruit VMS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Pay equityEmployee monitoring →