Org charts and org design
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Organimi 14%
28ChartHop14Organimi11Lucidchart47others
28% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.ChartHop held the lead, −2 points on 30%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
ChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Ingentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseIngentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ChartHop28%2%48accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.30% → 28%
ChartHop28%2%48accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.30% → 28%02Organimi14%9%44accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 14%
Organimi14%9%44accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 14%03
Lucidchart11%22%60accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 11%
Lucidchart11%22%60accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 11%04
Functionly9%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
Functionly9%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%05
OrgChart9%12%24accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
OrgChart9%12%24accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%06
Pingboard5%20%35accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 8% → 5%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 5%
Pingboard5%20%35accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 8% → 5%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 5%07
Orgvue4%30%10criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Orgvue4%30%10criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
Miro2%18%34accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Miro2%18%34accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09Ingentis org.manager2%11%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Ingentis org.manager2%11%19accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
diagrams.net2%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
diagrams.net2%11%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%11
Canva2%44%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Canva2%44%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Microsoft Visio0%33%39criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Microsoft Visio0%33%39criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%15
SmartDraw0%31%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
SmartDraw0%31%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%13
BambooHR0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
BambooHR0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Creately0%10%20accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
Creately0%10%20accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueOrganimi vs MiroLucidchart vs FunctionlyLucidchart vs OrgChartLucidchart vs PingboardLucidchart vs OrgvueLucidchart vs MiroFunctionly vs OrgChartFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs OrgvueFunctionly vs MiroOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvueOrgChart vs MiroPingboard vs OrgvuePingboard vs MiroOrgvue vs Miro
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01ChartHop28%
ChartHop28%02Organimi14%
Organimi14%03Lucidchart11%
Lucidchart11%04Functionly9%
Functionly9%05OrgChart9%
OrgChart9%06Pingboard5%
Pingboard5%07Orgvue4%
Orgvue4%08Miro2%
Miro2%09Ingentis org.manager2%
Ingentis org.manager2%10diagrams.net2%
diagrams.net2%11Canva2%
Canva2%12Creately0%
Creately0%13BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%14Microsoft Visio0%
Microsoft Visio0%15SmartDraw0%
SmartDraw0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lucidchart22%
13 of 60 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Lucidchart, Visio, Canva, SmartDraw, and similar tools can create polished charts, but they usually require manual updates or imports, so the chart can become stale quickly.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Microsoft Visio33%
13 of 39 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“basic versions of Canva, Microsoft Visio free tier, or no-name alternatives... Avoid for anything beyond very small teams” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Canva44%
8 of 18 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Static Presentation & Document Software (PowerPoint, Word, Excel, Canva) ... Why to avoid (for company-wide use)” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft PowerPoint100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid tools that force you to manually maintain a static chart—especially spreadsheets, PowerPoint slides” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 645 links across 134 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Planfix41 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
40 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zapier35 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FirstHR18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TheOrgChart.com17 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MuchSkills14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GoProfiles13 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Talkspirit13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 11 models
40 answers · 11 models
34 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartHop charthop.com | 28% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Organimi organimi.com | 14% | 115 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 | |
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 11% | 164 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| Functionly functionly.com | 9% | 39 | 1,300 | 0 | 45,770 | 0 | ||
| OrgChart orgchartstudio.com | 9% | 66 | 33,100 | 5 | 428 | |||
| Pingboard pingboard.com | 5% | 94 | 2,400 | 2 | 265 | |||
| draw.io drawio.com draw.io 4%, diagrams.net 2% | 5% | 40 | 90,500 | 1,096 | 141,930 | |||
| Orgvue orgvue.com | 4% | 107 | 880 | 10 | 20,029 | $9,026 | 22 | |
| Google Drawings google.com Google Drawings 2%, Google Workspace 2% | 4% | 31 | 368,000 | 7,422 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 | |
| Miro miro.com | 2% | 96 | 135,000 | 3,760 | 1,089,824 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (goprofiles.io, theorgchart.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboardno first choiceChangedChartHop, GoProfiles, Lucidchart, PingboardOrganimino first choiceagainst: Creately, EdrawMax, Lucidchart, Miro, Sift, draw.io
Four alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, PersonioFive alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Org Chart Studio, OrganimiFour alternatives
Creately, Google Drawings, Org Chart Studio, draw.ioGPT-5.4 miniOrgChartOrgvueChangedno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw, diagrams.net, draw.ioCanvaagainst: HR Partner, Pingboardno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Lucid, Microsoft Visio, MiroTwo alternatives
Nakisa Workforce Planning, PingboardFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, OrgChart, PingboardTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioGemini 3.5 FlashChartHopChartHopHeldagainst: Nakisa Org Design Suite, PingboardChartHopagainst: Microsoft VisioGoogle Workspace, draw.ioChartHop, Orgvue, Pingboardagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, OrgChartNowagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Excel, Gliffy, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Word, OrgChart
Five alternatives
HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhanaFour alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, Orgvue, TeamOhanaFour alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, PingboardFive alternatives
Canva, ChartHop, Microsoft 365, OrgPlease / Organimi, The OrgTwo alternatives
HiBob, RipplingPerplexity SonarChartHopFunctionlyChangedLucidchartOrganimiagainst: Lucidchartno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Deel, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Personio, SmartDraw, Workday
Four alternatives
GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrganimiFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Orgvue, SmartDrawEight alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboard, Sift, diagrams.netOne alternative
diagrams.netGrok 4.20Lucidchartagainst: diagrams.netFunctionlyChangedLucidchartOrganimiagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visiono first choiceagainst: Microsoft PowerPointagainst: Canva, HiBob, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Pingboard, The Org
Seven alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, PingboardFive alternatives
ChartHop, Dayforce, Miro, Orgvue, WorkdaySeven alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDrawFour alternatives
Canva, Creately, Miro, diagrams.netMistral SmallChartHop, OrgChartLucidchart, MiroChangedLucidchartOrgCanvasno first choiceagainst: Canva, Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Three alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, WorkleapThree alternatives
Donut, Notion, SlackSix alternatives
ChartHop, Functionly, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Monday.com, OrganimiFour alternatives
Canva, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, diagrams.netDeepSeek V4 FlashChartHopFunctionlyChangedagainst: Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgvueChartHop, PingboardOrganimiChartHop, OrgChartagainst: Nakisa Org Design Suite, Organimiagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Pingboard, SmartDraw
Two alternatives
Functionly, OrgChartFour alternatives
Creately, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, OrgChartSeven alternatives
BambooHR, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, SmartDrawThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, diagrams.netOne alternative
PingboardLlama 4 MaverickLucidchartno first choiceChangedno first choiceOrganimino first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Miro, PlanfixTwo alternatives
Leapsome, LucidchartQwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational ChartsFunctionallyChangedagainst: Ingentis org.manager, OrgvuePingboardLucidchartno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Oracle, SAPagainst: Lucidchart, Manual Excel/PowerPoint Templates, Microsoft Visio
Three alternatives
BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChartOne alternative
CreatelySix alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, SmartDrawThree alternatives
Canva, Google Sheets, OrganimiKimi K2ChartHop, PingboardChartHopChangedChartHop, Lucidchart, OrgChartOrganimiOrgChartagainst: Organimi, Pingboardagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw
One alternative
LucidchartFour alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrganimiThree alternatives
Creately, Microsoft Visio, WorkleapThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
ChartHop, LucidchartGLM 4.7 FlashXChartHopagainst: Miro, OrganimiFunctionly, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartChangedagainst: Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgvueChartHop, LucidchartGoogle Drawings, diagrams.netChartHopagainst: Canva, Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Four alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDrawFive alternatives
Bizneo, GlassFrog, Gliffy, Lucidchart, Miro B2B Org Chart TemplateFourteen alternatives
BambooHR, Creately, Deel, Factorial, FirstHR, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Monday.com, Organimi, Pingboard, Planfix, SmartDraw, diagrams.netThree alternatives
GoProfiles, Miro, OrganimiFour alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Nakisa OrgInsight, OrgChartMiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHopFunctionlyChangedLucidchart, PingboardLucidchart, Organimino first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Canva, Excel, HiBob, Microsoft PowerPoint, Workday
Five alternatives
GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, WorkleapFour alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart, WorkdayFive alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Ingentis org.manager, Organimi, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
Functionly, PingboardGPT-6 LunaChartHopagainst: LucidchartChartHopHeldno first choicedraw.iono first choiceagainst: Canva, Microsoft Visio
One alternative
OrgChartOne alternative
OrgvueSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap, draw.ioOne alternative
OrganimiMuse Glimmer 30BLucidchartChartHopChangedLucidchartOrganimino first choiceagainst: OrgChart, LLC, The Org
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Organimi, PingboardTwo alternatives
Functionly, OrganimiSix alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, PingboardThree alternatives
Creately, Miro, diagrams.netBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 8 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 15 | 147 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:41 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 16 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 5 | 69 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 9 | 54 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 81 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 7 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 7 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 11 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:34 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:15 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:25 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
ChartSpan
Doxee
EdrawMax
Functionally
GlassFrog
Google Workspace directory
Holacracy One
Leena AI OrgChart
Manual Excel/PowerPoint Templates
Microsoft 365 built-in org view ( Delve / Teams Cards )
Miro B2B Org Chart Template
Nintex
OrgChart, LLC
OrgChart.js
OrgChartDesk
OrgChartNow
OrgPlease / Organimi
Organizational Charts (by peopleGlobe)
Reinventing Organizations
VUE (Visual Understanding Environment)
iOrgChart
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.